Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex

Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis, that the effectiveness of irrigation in removing smear layer in the apical third of root canal system is dependent on the depth of placement of the irrigation needle into the root canal and the enlargement size of the canal. Materials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ho-Jin Moon, Chan-Ui Hong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2012-02-01
Series:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.24
_version_ 1819032193229389824
author Ho-Jin Moon
Chan-Ui Hong
author_facet Ho-Jin Moon
Chan-Ui Hong
author_sort Ho-Jin Moon
collection DOAJ
description Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis, that the effectiveness of irrigation in removing smear layer in the apical third of root canal system is dependent on the depth of placement of the irrigation needle into the root canal and the enlargement size of the canal. Materials and Methods Eighty sound human lower incisors were divided into eight groups according to the enlargement size (#25, #30, #35 and #40) and the needle penetration depth (3 mm from working length, WL-3 mm and 9 mm from working length, WL-9 mm). Each canal was enlarged to working length with Profile.06 Rotary Ni-Ti files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl. Then, each canal received a final irrigation with 3 mL of 3% EDTA for 4 min, followed by 5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl at different level (WL-3 mm and WL-9 mm) from working length. Each specimen was prepared for the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Photographs of the 3mm area from the apical constriction of each canal with a magnification of ×250, ×500, ×1,000, ×2,500 were taken for the final evaluation. Results Removal of smear layer in WL-3 mm group showed a significantly different effect when the canal was enlarged to larger than #30. There was a significant difference in removing apical smear layer between the needle penetration depth of WL-3 mm and WL-9 mm. Conclusions Removal of smear layer from the apical portion of root canals was effectively accomplished with apical instrumentation to #35/40 06 taper file and 3 mm needle penetration from the working length.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T06:58:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32542020ad0e43e2a1ee58beefac790e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T06:58:03Z
publishDate 2012-02-01
publisher Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format Article
series Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
spelling doaj.art-32542020ad0e43e2a1ee58beefac790e2022-12-21T19:12:17ZengKorean Academy of Conservative DentistryRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics2234-76582234-76662012-02-01371242810.5395/rde.2012.37.1.24 Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apexHo-Jin Moon0Chan-Ui Hong1Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering Lab., Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.Department of Conservative Dentistry, Plant Dental Hospital, Daejon, Korea.Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis, that the effectiveness of irrigation in removing smear layer in the apical third of root canal system is dependent on the depth of placement of the irrigation needle into the root canal and the enlargement size of the canal. Materials and Methods Eighty sound human lower incisors were divided into eight groups according to the enlargement size (#25, #30, #35 and #40) and the needle penetration depth (3 mm from working length, WL-3 mm and 9 mm from working length, WL-9 mm). Each canal was enlarged to working length with Profile.06 Rotary Ni-Ti files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl. Then, each canal received a final irrigation with 3 mL of 3% EDTA for 4 min, followed by 5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl at different level (WL-3 mm and WL-9 mm) from working length. Each specimen was prepared for the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Photographs of the 3mm area from the apical constriction of each canal with a magnification of ×250, ×500, ×1,000, ×2,500 were taken for the final evaluation. Results Removal of smear layer in WL-3 mm group showed a significantly different effect when the canal was enlarged to larger than #30. There was a significant difference in removing apical smear layer between the needle penetration depth of WL-3 mm and WL-9 mm. Conclusions Removal of smear layer from the apical portion of root canals was effectively accomplished with apical instrumentation to #35/40 06 taper file and 3 mm needle penetration from the working length.https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.24
spellingShingle Ho-Jin Moon
Chan-Ui Hong
Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
title Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
title_full Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
title_fullStr Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
title_full_unstemmed Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
title_short Effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
title_sort effects of canal enlargement and irrigation needle depth on the cleaning of the root canal system at 3 mm from the apex
url https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.24
work_keys_str_mv AT hojinmoon effectsofcanalenlargementandirrigationneedledepthonthecleaningoftherootcanalsystemat3mmfromtheapex
AT chanuihong effectsofcanalenlargementandirrigationneedledepthonthecleaningoftherootcanalsystemat3mmfromtheapex