Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple
The origin of the Doric temple can be explained as a result of a creative process based on traditions and elements from Bronze Age culture. The cella, based on a house type which can be traced from the Mycenaean palace “megara” back to prehistoric periods, may have been modelled on Mycenaean buildi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Oslo Library
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Acta ad Archaeologiam et Artium Historiam Pertinentia |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uio.no/acta/article/view/5740 |
| _version_ | 1827825015596253184 |
|---|---|
| author | Erik Østby |
| author_facet | Erik Østby |
| author_sort | Erik Østby |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The origin of the Doric temple can be explained as a result of a creative process based on traditions and elements from Bronze Age culture. The cella, based on a house type which can be traced from the Mycenaean palace “megara” back to prehistoric periods, may have been modelled on Mycenaean buildings of this type still preserved in the early Iron Age and used for religious purposes; there is some evidence for such situations at Eleusis and Tiryns. The Doric formal apparatus of columns and epistyle is explained as a conscious imitation of Mycenaean decorative architecture still visible in the eight and seventh centuries, initially transposed to wooden architecture. The peristasis reflects ancient religious associations connected with the columns, which when surrounding the temple make its religious status and function evident, even if only the flanks or rear of the building can be seen when the sanctuary is approached. A case can be made for pin-pointing the new synthesis to the Heraion at Argos in the Late Geometric period, where the topographical situation and the location close to the impressive monuments at Mycenae, and the desire to emulate these monuments (demonstrated by the retaining wall of the upper platform datable to this period) together created favourable circumstances for such an invention. In this case, the old temple of Hera may have been the first truly Doric and peripteral temple, dating perhaps as early as the late eight or early seventh century BC.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:36:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3262a4df762b4469920babb5cd2d2a7c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0065-0900 2611-3686 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:36:08Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Oslo Library |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta ad Archaeologiam et Artium Historiam Pertinentia |
| spelling | doaj.art-3262a4df762b4469920babb5cd2d2a7c2023-09-04T14:47:52ZengUniversity of Oslo LibraryActa ad Archaeologiam et Artium Historiam Pertinentia0065-09002611-36862017-12-01206 N.S.10.5617/acta.5740Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric templeErik Østby The origin of the Doric temple can be explained as a result of a creative process based on traditions and elements from Bronze Age culture. The cella, based on a house type which can be traced from the Mycenaean palace “megara” back to prehistoric periods, may have been modelled on Mycenaean buildings of this type still preserved in the early Iron Age and used for religious purposes; there is some evidence for such situations at Eleusis and Tiryns. The Doric formal apparatus of columns and epistyle is explained as a conscious imitation of Mycenaean decorative architecture still visible in the eight and seventh centuries, initially transposed to wooden architecture. The peristasis reflects ancient religious associations connected with the columns, which when surrounding the temple make its religious status and function evident, even if only the flanks or rear of the building can be seen when the sanctuary is approached. A case can be made for pin-pointing the new synthesis to the Heraion at Argos in the Late Geometric period, where the topographical situation and the location close to the impressive monuments at Mycenae, and the desire to emulate these monuments (demonstrated by the retaining wall of the upper platform datable to this period) together created favourable circumstances for such an invention. In this case, the old temple of Hera may have been the first truly Doric and peripteral temple, dating perhaps as early as the late eight or early seventh century BC. https://journals.uio.no/acta/article/view/5740 |
| spellingShingle | Erik Østby Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple Acta ad Archaeologiam et Artium Historiam Pertinentia |
| title | Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple |
| title_full | Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple |
| title_fullStr | Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple |
| title_full_unstemmed | Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple |
| title_short | Continuatio, Renovatio and Innovatio: The birth of the Doric temple |
| title_sort | continuatio renovatio and innovatio the birth of the doric temple |
| url | https://journals.uio.no/acta/article/view/5740 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT erikøstby continuatiorenovatioandinnovatiothebirthofthedorictemple |