The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation

The aim of the study was to determine the long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation with nitrogen fertilisation. The rotation included: legumes + spring barley, winter triticale and winter rape. The study was conducted as a two-factorial field experiment with four repl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grażyna Szymańska, Agnieszka Faligowska, Katarzyna Panasiewicz, Jerzy Szukała, Karolina Ratajczak, Hanna Sulewska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-02-01
Series:Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1677766
_version_ 1797684388624859136
author Grażyna Szymańska
Agnieszka Faligowska
Katarzyna Panasiewicz
Jerzy Szukała
Karolina Ratajczak
Hanna Sulewska
author_facet Grażyna Szymańska
Agnieszka Faligowska
Katarzyna Panasiewicz
Jerzy Szukała
Karolina Ratajczak
Hanna Sulewska
author_sort Grażyna Szymańska
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study was to determine the long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation with nitrogen fertilisation. The rotation included: legumes + spring barley, winter triticale and winter rape. The study was conducted as a two-factorial field experiment with four replications. The present study showed that legumes, as forecrops, increased the yield of WT cultivated in the second year of rotation. The seed yield of WR cultivated in the third year of rotation significantly increased after all legume forecrops, with the exception of PEA. Yielding of these crops depended also on nitrogen fertilisation. In the case of WT doses 120 kg N ha−1 and 180 kg N ha−1 there was an increased yield compared with control independent of forecrop, but there were no significant differences between doses 120 and 180 kg N ha−1. The conclusion is that we do not need to use dose 180 kg N ha−1 for WT cultivated directly after legumes. In the cultivation of WR in the third year of rotation there is no need to use a dose of nitrogen 180 kg N ha−1 if the fore-fore-crops were indeterminate cultivars of BL or YL.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:29:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-326f139aaa574cf0be34d9c4f28997f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0906-4710
1651-1913
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:29:00Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-326f139aaa574cf0be34d9c4f28997f22023-09-15T10:26:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science0906-47101651-19132020-02-0170212813410.1080/09064710.2019.16777661677766The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisationGrażyna Szymańska0Agnieszka Faligowska1Katarzyna Panasiewicz2Jerzy Szukała3Karolina Ratajczak4Hanna Sulewska5Poznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesThe aim of the study was to determine the long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation with nitrogen fertilisation. The rotation included: legumes + spring barley, winter triticale and winter rape. The study was conducted as a two-factorial field experiment with four replications. The present study showed that legumes, as forecrops, increased the yield of WT cultivated in the second year of rotation. The seed yield of WR cultivated in the third year of rotation significantly increased after all legume forecrops, with the exception of PEA. Yielding of these crops depended also on nitrogen fertilisation. In the case of WT doses 120 kg N ha−1 and 180 kg N ha−1 there was an increased yield compared with control independent of forecrop, but there were no significant differences between doses 120 and 180 kg N ha−1. The conclusion is that we do not need to use dose 180 kg N ha−1 for WT cultivated directly after legumes. In the cultivation of WR in the third year of rotation there is no need to use a dose of nitrogen 180 kg N ha−1 if the fore-fore-crops were indeterminate cultivars of BL or YL.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1677766legumesforecropyield of winter triticalewinter rape
spellingShingle Grażyna Szymańska
Agnieszka Faligowska
Katarzyna Panasiewicz
Jerzy Szukała
Karolina Ratajczak
Hanna Sulewska
The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science
legumes
forecrop
yield of winter triticale
winter rape
title The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
title_full The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
title_fullStr The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
title_full_unstemmed The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
title_short The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
title_sort long term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
topic legumes
forecrop
yield of winter triticale
winter rape
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1677766
work_keys_str_mv AT grazynaszymanska thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT agnieszkafaligowska thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT katarzynapanasiewicz thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT jerzyszukała thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT karolinaratajczak thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT hannasulewska thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT grazynaszymanska longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT agnieszkafaligowska longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT katarzynapanasiewicz longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT jerzyszukała longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT karolinaratajczak longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation
AT hannasulewska longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation