The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation
The aim of the study was to determine the long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation with nitrogen fertilisation. The rotation included: legumes + spring barley, winter triticale and winter rape. The study was conducted as a two-factorial field experiment with four repl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1677766 |
_version_ | 1797684388624859136 |
---|---|
author | Grażyna Szymańska Agnieszka Faligowska Katarzyna Panasiewicz Jerzy Szukała Karolina Ratajczak Hanna Sulewska |
author_facet | Grażyna Szymańska Agnieszka Faligowska Katarzyna Panasiewicz Jerzy Szukała Karolina Ratajczak Hanna Sulewska |
author_sort | Grażyna Szymańska |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of the study was to determine the long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation with nitrogen fertilisation. The rotation included: legumes + spring barley, winter triticale and winter rape. The study was conducted as a two-factorial field experiment with four replications. The present study showed that legumes, as forecrops, increased the yield of WT cultivated in the second year of rotation. The seed yield of WR cultivated in the third year of rotation significantly increased after all legume forecrops, with the exception of PEA. Yielding of these crops depended also on nitrogen fertilisation. In the case of WT doses 120 kg N ha−1 and 180 kg N ha−1 there was an increased yield compared with control independent of forecrop, but there were no significant differences between doses 120 and 180 kg N ha−1. The conclusion is that we do not need to use dose 180 kg N ha−1 for WT cultivated directly after legumes. In the cultivation of WR in the third year of rotation there is no need to use a dose of nitrogen 180 kg N ha−1 if the fore-fore-crops were indeterminate cultivars of BL or YL. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T00:29:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-326f139aaa574cf0be34d9c4f28997f2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0906-4710 1651-1913 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T00:29:00Z |
publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science |
spelling | doaj.art-326f139aaa574cf0be34d9c4f28997f22023-09-15T10:26:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science0906-47101651-19132020-02-0170212813410.1080/09064710.2019.16777661677766The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisationGrażyna Szymańska0Agnieszka Faligowska1Katarzyna Panasiewicz2Jerzy Szukała3Karolina Ratajczak4Hanna Sulewska5Poznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznań University of Life SciencesThe aim of the study was to determine the long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation with nitrogen fertilisation. The rotation included: legumes + spring barley, winter triticale and winter rape. The study was conducted as a two-factorial field experiment with four replications. The present study showed that legumes, as forecrops, increased the yield of WT cultivated in the second year of rotation. The seed yield of WR cultivated in the third year of rotation significantly increased after all legume forecrops, with the exception of PEA. Yielding of these crops depended also on nitrogen fertilisation. In the case of WT doses 120 kg N ha−1 and 180 kg N ha−1 there was an increased yield compared with control independent of forecrop, but there were no significant differences between doses 120 and 180 kg N ha−1. The conclusion is that we do not need to use dose 180 kg N ha−1 for WT cultivated directly after legumes. In the cultivation of WR in the third year of rotation there is no need to use a dose of nitrogen 180 kg N ha−1 if the fore-fore-crops were indeterminate cultivars of BL or YL.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1677766legumesforecropyield of winter triticalewinter rape |
spellingShingle | Grażyna Szymańska Agnieszka Faligowska Katarzyna Panasiewicz Jerzy Szukała Karolina Ratajczak Hanna Sulewska The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B, Soil and Plant Science legumes forecrop yield of winter triticale winter rape |
title | The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation |
title_full | The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation |
title_fullStr | The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation |
title_full_unstemmed | The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation |
title_short | The long-term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale–winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation |
title_sort | long term effect of legumes as forecrops on the productivity of rotation winter triticale winter rape with nitrogen fertilisation |
topic | legumes forecrop yield of winter triticale winter rape |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1677766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grazynaszymanska thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT agnieszkafaligowska thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT katarzynapanasiewicz thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT jerzyszukała thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT karolinaratajczak thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT hannasulewska thelongtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT grazynaszymanska longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT agnieszkafaligowska longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT katarzynapanasiewicz longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT jerzyszukała longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT karolinaratajczak longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation AT hannasulewska longtermeffectoflegumesasforecropsontheproductivityofrotationwintertriticalewinterrapewithnitrogenfertilisation |