Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia

Abstract Objective: This study investigated the nature and extent of unhealthy food, beverage, alcohol and gambling sponsors of children's sport development programs. Methods: Websites of junior development sport programs (n=56) associated with sporting organisations that received funding from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wendy L. Watson, Rebecca Brunner, Lyndal Wellard, Clare Hughes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-08-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12541
_version_ 1797728259775922176
author Wendy L. Watson
Rebecca Brunner
Lyndal Wellard
Clare Hughes
author_facet Wendy L. Watson
Rebecca Brunner
Lyndal Wellard
Clare Hughes
author_sort Wendy L. Watson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: This study investigated the nature and extent of unhealthy food, beverage, alcohol and gambling sponsors of children's sport development programs. Methods: Websites of junior development sport programs (n=56) associated with sporting organisations that received funding from the Australian Sporting Commission were analysed. Sponsors were considered unhealthy if they were alcohol or gambling companies or sold food and/or beverages that failed independent nutrition criteria. The websites of the sport development programs were also analysed for types of promotion. Results: There were 246 sponsors identified. Eleven (4.5%) sponsors were food, beverage, alcohol or gambling companies of which 10 (91%) were unhealthy. Surf Lifesaving (n=4) and athletics (n=3) websites had the highest number of unhealthy sponsors. Promotions associated with unhealthy sponsorship included logo placement on homepages (100%), naming rights (31%), logo on sport uniforms (27%) and branded participant packs (31%). Conclusions: The majority of food and beverage company sponsors in sport development programs are companies associated with unhealthy products. Two websites hosting junior development program information included an alcohol company sponsor and a gambling company sponsor. Implications: Unhealthy product sponsorship of children's sport should be addressed as part of a comprehensive regulation designed to reduce exposure to marketing of unhealthy foods.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:11:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-327b98c2c38e48bab999a2a9d542f062
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:11:25Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-327b98c2c38e48bab999a2a9d542f0622023-09-02T02:48:16ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052016-08-0140432632810.1111/1753-6405.12541Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in AustraliaWendy L. Watson0Rebecca Brunner1Lyndal Wellard2Clare Hughes3Cancer Programs Division Cancer Council NSW New South WalesFaculty of Science Medicine and Health, School of Medicine University of Wollongong New South WalesCancer Programs Division Cancer Council NSW New South WalesCancer Programs Division Cancer Council NSW New South WalesAbstract Objective: This study investigated the nature and extent of unhealthy food, beverage, alcohol and gambling sponsors of children's sport development programs. Methods: Websites of junior development sport programs (n=56) associated with sporting organisations that received funding from the Australian Sporting Commission were analysed. Sponsors were considered unhealthy if they were alcohol or gambling companies or sold food and/or beverages that failed independent nutrition criteria. The websites of the sport development programs were also analysed for types of promotion. Results: There were 246 sponsors identified. Eleven (4.5%) sponsors were food, beverage, alcohol or gambling companies of which 10 (91%) were unhealthy. Surf Lifesaving (n=4) and athletics (n=3) websites had the highest number of unhealthy sponsors. Promotions associated with unhealthy sponsorship included logo placement on homepages (100%), naming rights (31%), logo on sport uniforms (27%) and branded participant packs (31%). Conclusions: The majority of food and beverage company sponsors in sport development programs are companies associated with unhealthy products. Two websites hosting junior development program information included an alcohol company sponsor and a gambling company sponsor. Implications: Unhealthy product sponsorship of children's sport should be addressed as part of a comprehensive regulation designed to reduce exposure to marketing of unhealthy foods.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12541childrensportsponsorshipfood marketing
spellingShingle Wendy L. Watson
Rebecca Brunner
Lyndal Wellard
Clare Hughes
Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
children
sport
sponsorship
food marketing
title Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia
title_full Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia
title_fullStr Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia
title_short Sponsorship of junior sport development programs in Australia
title_sort sponsorship of junior sport development programs in australia
topic children
sport
sponsorship
food marketing
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12541
work_keys_str_mv AT wendylwatson sponsorshipofjuniorsportdevelopmentprogramsinaustralia
AT rebeccabrunner sponsorshipofjuniorsportdevelopmentprogramsinaustralia
AT lyndalwellard sponsorshipofjuniorsportdevelopmentprogramsinaustralia
AT clarehughes sponsorshipofjuniorsportdevelopmentprogramsinaustralia