An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract Background: The international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) study technique is a specialized method for classifying and identifying adnexal growths. It employs 10 simple ultrasound directions to characterize masses as benign or malignant. Objectives: This study aims to provide pre-operativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amatul Kareem Sumaya, Banavath Swetha, Aithagani Ramachandraiah, Nadeem Ahmed, Sunitha Bajaj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2023-11-01
Series:Health Technology Assessment in Action
Subjects:
Online Access:https://htainaction.tums.ac.ir/index.php/hta/article/view/189
_version_ 1797394726315360256
author Amatul Kareem Sumaya
Banavath Swetha
Aithagani Ramachandraiah
Nadeem Ahmed
Sunitha Bajaj
author_facet Amatul Kareem Sumaya
Banavath Swetha
Aithagani Ramachandraiah
Nadeem Ahmed
Sunitha Bajaj
author_sort Amatul Kareem Sumaya
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background: The international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) study technique is a specialized method for classifying and identifying adnexal growths. It employs 10 simple ultrasound directions to characterize masses as benign or malignant. Objectives: This study aims to provide pre-operative information to help gynecologists manage ovarian masses, avoiding delays in malignancy treatment and unnecessary surgery for benign lesions. Methods: This was a hospital-based observational study conducted in the radiology department on patients with clinical diagnoses of ovarian masses from August 2020 to March 2022 by prospective randomized sampling method. Patients with suspected ovarian pathology were evaluated using IOTA ultrasound rules and designated benign or malignant. The patients underwent a thorough history and clinical examination. Ultrasound was used to confirm the ovarian origin of the mass and differentiate it as benign or malignant. A transvaginal ultrasound was performed where necessary. Histopathological examination was the gold standard to confirm ultrasound and Doppler findings. Descriptive stats: Frequencies/percentages for categorical data, mean ± SD for normal, median with IQR for non-normal Uncertainty measured by 95% CI. Results: During the study, 50 women were eligible for the study, and the mean age of the participants was 45.3 years. Of 50 patients who underwent surgery, 38 cases were considered benign based on IOTA USG rules, of which 35 were benign and 3 were malignant histologically Eight cases were considered malignant based on IOTA USG rules, of which 6 were malignant and 2 were benign. Four cases were considered indeterminate, with two being benign and two being malignant histologically. If inconclusive cases are classified as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity are 75% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: USG is an easily available imaging tool that can be used as an initial modality in evaluating ovarian masses. IOTA simple ultrasound rules have diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian masses and help in management.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:24:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3281df01f0754dc8b3a7a188ad1f5486
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2645-3835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:24:04Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Health Technology Assessment in Action
spelling doaj.art-3281df01f0754dc8b3a7a188ad1f54862023-12-12T04:42:15ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesHealth Technology Assessment in Action2645-38352023-11-017310.18502/htaa.v7i3.14211An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care HospitalAmatul Kareem Sumaya0Banavath Swetha1Aithagani Ramachandraiah2Nadeem Ahmed3Sunitha Bajaj4Department of Radio-diagnosis from Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, IndiaPost Graduate 3rdyr at Department of Radio-diagnosis from Osmania Medical College, HyderabadDepartment of Radio-diagnosis from Osmania Medical College, MNJ Institute of Regional Cancer Center, Hyderabad, IndiaDepartment of Radio-diagnosis from Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, IndiaDepartment of Radio-diagnosis from Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, India Abstract Background: The international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) study technique is a specialized method for classifying and identifying adnexal growths. It employs 10 simple ultrasound directions to characterize masses as benign or malignant. Objectives: This study aims to provide pre-operative information to help gynecologists manage ovarian masses, avoiding delays in malignancy treatment and unnecessary surgery for benign lesions. Methods: This was a hospital-based observational study conducted in the radiology department on patients with clinical diagnoses of ovarian masses from August 2020 to March 2022 by prospective randomized sampling method. Patients with suspected ovarian pathology were evaluated using IOTA ultrasound rules and designated benign or malignant. The patients underwent a thorough history and clinical examination. Ultrasound was used to confirm the ovarian origin of the mass and differentiate it as benign or malignant. A transvaginal ultrasound was performed where necessary. Histopathological examination was the gold standard to confirm ultrasound and Doppler findings. Descriptive stats: Frequencies/percentages for categorical data, mean ± SD for normal, median with IQR for non-normal Uncertainty measured by 95% CI. Results: During the study, 50 women were eligible for the study, and the mean age of the participants was 45.3 years. Of 50 patients who underwent surgery, 38 cases were considered benign based on IOTA USG rules, of which 35 were benign and 3 were malignant histologically Eight cases were considered malignant based on IOTA USG rules, of which 6 were malignant and 2 were benign. Four cases were considered indeterminate, with two being benign and two being malignant histologically. If inconclusive cases are classified as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity are 75% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: USG is an easily available imaging tool that can be used as an initial modality in evaluating ovarian masses. IOTA simple ultrasound rules have diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian masses and help in management. https://htainaction.tums.ac.ir/index.php/hta/article/view/189IOTAUSG rulesInternational Ovarian Tumour AnalysisOvarian cancers
spellingShingle Amatul Kareem Sumaya
Banavath Swetha
Aithagani Ramachandraiah
Nadeem Ahmed
Sunitha Bajaj
An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Health Technology Assessment in Action
IOTA
USG rules
International Ovarian Tumour Analysis
Ovarian cancers
title An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_full An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_fullStr An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_full_unstemmed An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_short An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_sort observational study on evaluation of iota ultrasound simple rules to distinguish benign and malignant ovarian masses and histopathological correlation in a tertiary care hospital
topic IOTA
USG rules
International Ovarian Tumour Analysis
Ovarian cancers
url https://htainaction.tums.ac.ir/index.php/hta/article/view/189
work_keys_str_mv AT amatulkareemsumaya anobservationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT banavathswetha anobservationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT aithaganiramachandraiah anobservationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT nadeemahmed anobservationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT sunithabajaj anobservationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT amatulkareemsumaya observationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT banavathswetha observationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT aithaganiramachandraiah observationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT nadeemahmed observationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital
AT sunithabajaj observationalstudyonevaluationofiotaultrasoundsimplerulestodistinguishbenignandmalignantovarianmassesandhistopathologicalcorrelationinatertiarycarehospital