Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.

We have previously found regional differences in the prevalence of known type 2 diabetes between northeastern and southern Germany. We aim to also provide prevalence estimates for prediabetes (isolated impaired fasting glucose (i-IFG), isolated glucose intolerance (i-IGT), combined IFG and IGT) and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teresa Tamayo, Sabine Schipf, Christine Meisinger, Michaela Schunk, Werner Maier, Christian Herder, Michael Roden, Matthias Nauck, Annette Peters, Henry Völzke, Wolfgang Rathmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4234669?pdf=render
_version_ 1828329696526336000
author Teresa Tamayo
Sabine Schipf
Christine Meisinger
Michaela Schunk
Werner Maier
Christian Herder
Michael Roden
Matthias Nauck
Annette Peters
Henry Völzke
Wolfgang Rathmann
author_facet Teresa Tamayo
Sabine Schipf
Christine Meisinger
Michaela Schunk
Werner Maier
Christian Herder
Michael Roden
Matthias Nauck
Annette Peters
Henry Völzke
Wolfgang Rathmann
author_sort Teresa Tamayo
collection DOAJ
description We have previously found regional differences in the prevalence of known type 2 diabetes between northeastern and southern Germany. We aim to also provide prevalence estimates for prediabetes (isolated impaired fasting glucose (i-IFG), isolated glucose intolerance (i-IGT), combined IFG and IGT) and unknown type 2 diabetes for both regions.Prevalence (95%CI) of prediabetes (i-IFG: fasting glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/l; i-IGT: 2 h postchallenge glucose 7.8-11.0 mmol/l, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), ≥ 8 h overnight fasting) and unknown diabetes were analyzed in two regional population-based surveys (age group 35-79 years): SHIP-TREND (Study of Health in Pomerania (northeast), 2008-2012) and KORA F4 (Cooperative Health Research in the region of Augsburg (south), 2006-2008). Both studies used similar methods, questionnaires, and identical protocols for OGTT. Overall, 1,980 participants from SHIP-TREND and 2,617 participants from KORA F4 were included.Age-sex-standardized prevalence estimates (95%CI) of prediabetes and unknown diabetes were considerably higher in the northeast (SHIP-TREND: 43.1%; 40.9-45.3% and 7.1%; 5.9-8.2%) than in the south of Germany (KORA F4: 30.1%; 28.4-31.7% and 3.9%; 3.2-4.6%), respectively. In particular, i-IFG (26.4%; 24.5-28.3% vs. 17.2%; 15.7-18.6%) and IFG+IGT (11.2%; 9.8-12.6% vs. 6.6%; 5.7-7.5%) were more frequent in SHIP-TREND than in KORA. In comparison to normal glucose tolerance, the odds of having unknown diabetes (OR, 95%CI: 2.59; 1.84-3.65) or prediabetes (1.98; 1.70-2.31) was higher in the northeast than in the south after adjustment for known risk factors (obesity, lifestyle).The regional differences of prediabetes and unknown diabetes are in line with the geographical pattern of known diabetes in Germany. The higher prevalences in the northeast were not explained by traditional risk factors.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:29:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32865cc8bb754c8189366e9d2c13718a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:29:15Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-32865cc8bb754c8189366e9d2c13718a2022-12-22T02:31:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11315410.1371/journal.pone.0113154Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.Teresa TamayoSabine SchipfChristine MeisingerMichaela SchunkWerner MaierChristian HerderMichael RodenMatthias NauckAnnette PetersHenry VölzkeWolfgang RathmannWe have previously found regional differences in the prevalence of known type 2 diabetes between northeastern and southern Germany. We aim to also provide prevalence estimates for prediabetes (isolated impaired fasting glucose (i-IFG), isolated glucose intolerance (i-IGT), combined IFG and IGT) and unknown type 2 diabetes for both regions.Prevalence (95%CI) of prediabetes (i-IFG: fasting glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/l; i-IGT: 2 h postchallenge glucose 7.8-11.0 mmol/l, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), ≥ 8 h overnight fasting) and unknown diabetes were analyzed in two regional population-based surveys (age group 35-79 years): SHIP-TREND (Study of Health in Pomerania (northeast), 2008-2012) and KORA F4 (Cooperative Health Research in the region of Augsburg (south), 2006-2008). Both studies used similar methods, questionnaires, and identical protocols for OGTT. Overall, 1,980 participants from SHIP-TREND and 2,617 participants from KORA F4 were included.Age-sex-standardized prevalence estimates (95%CI) of prediabetes and unknown diabetes were considerably higher in the northeast (SHIP-TREND: 43.1%; 40.9-45.3% and 7.1%; 5.9-8.2%) than in the south of Germany (KORA F4: 30.1%; 28.4-31.7% and 3.9%; 3.2-4.6%), respectively. In particular, i-IFG (26.4%; 24.5-28.3% vs. 17.2%; 15.7-18.6%) and IFG+IGT (11.2%; 9.8-12.6% vs. 6.6%; 5.7-7.5%) were more frequent in SHIP-TREND than in KORA. In comparison to normal glucose tolerance, the odds of having unknown diabetes (OR, 95%CI: 2.59; 1.84-3.65) or prediabetes (1.98; 1.70-2.31) was higher in the northeast than in the south after adjustment for known risk factors (obesity, lifestyle).The regional differences of prediabetes and unknown diabetes are in line with the geographical pattern of known diabetes in Germany. The higher prevalences in the northeast were not explained by traditional risk factors.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4234669?pdf=render
spellingShingle Teresa Tamayo
Sabine Schipf
Christine Meisinger
Michaela Schunk
Werner Maier
Christian Herder
Michael Roden
Matthias Nauck
Annette Peters
Henry Völzke
Wolfgang Rathmann
Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.
PLoS ONE
title Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.
title_full Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.
title_fullStr Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.
title_full_unstemmed Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.
title_short Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors.
title_sort regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4234669?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT teresatamayo regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT sabineschipf regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT christinemeisinger regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT michaelaschunk regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT wernermaier regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT christianherder regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT michaelroden regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT matthiasnauck regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT annettepeters regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT henryvolzke regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors
AT wolfgangrathmann regionaldifferencesofundiagnosedtype2diabetesandprediabetesprevalencearenotexplainedbyknownriskfactors