Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an established treatment for end-stage left ventricular heart failure. Parameters are needed to identify the most appropriate patients for LVADs. This study aimed to evaluate pectoral muscle mass and density as prognostic parameters. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freya Sophie Jenkins, Jan-Philipp Minol, Tarik Akar, Esma Yilmaz, Moritz Benjamin Immohr, Ismail Dalyanoglu, Bernhard Korbmacher, Joel Aissa, Udo Boeken, Artur Lichtenberg, Payam Akhyari, Hannan Dalyanoglu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02547-8
_version_ 1797273305467584512
author Freya Sophie Jenkins
Jan-Philipp Minol
Tarik Akar
Esma Yilmaz
Moritz Benjamin Immohr
Ismail Dalyanoglu
Bernhard Korbmacher
Joel Aissa
Udo Boeken
Artur Lichtenberg
Payam Akhyari
Hannan Dalyanoglu
author_facet Freya Sophie Jenkins
Jan-Philipp Minol
Tarik Akar
Esma Yilmaz
Moritz Benjamin Immohr
Ismail Dalyanoglu
Bernhard Korbmacher
Joel Aissa
Udo Boeken
Artur Lichtenberg
Payam Akhyari
Hannan Dalyanoglu
author_sort Freya Sophie Jenkins
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an established treatment for end-stage left ventricular heart failure. Parameters are needed to identify the most appropriate patients for LVADs. This study aimed to evaluate pectoral muscle mass and density as prognostic parameters. Methods This single-center study included all patients with LVAD implantation between January 2010 and October 2017 and a preoperative chest CT scan. Pectoral muscle mass was assessed using the Pectoralis Muscle Index (PMI, surface area indexed to height, cm2/m2) and pectoral muscle density by Hounsfield Units (HU). Overall mortality was analyzed with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and 1-year and 3-year mortality with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression models. Results 57 patients (89.5% male, mean age 57.8 years) were included. 64.9% of patients had end-stage left ventricular failure due to ischemic heart disease and 35.1% due to dilated cardiomyopathy. 49.2% of patients had preoperative INTERMACS profile of 1 or 2 and 33.3% received mechanical circulatory support prior to LVAD implantation. Total mean PMI was 4.7 cm2/m2 (± 1.6), overall HU of the major pectoral muscle was 39.0 (± 14.9) and of the minor pectoral muscle 37.1 (± 16.6). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years (± 0.2). Mortality rates were 37.5% at 1 year and 48.0% at 3 years. Neither PMI nor HU were significantly associated with overall mortality at 1-year or 3-year. Conclusions The results of our study do not confirm the association between higher pectoral muscle mass and better survival after LVAD implantation previously described in the literature.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:41:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32868079b3184cca83389b2096c2ff25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:41:31Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-32868079b3184cca83389b2096c2ff252024-03-05T20:18:57ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902024-02-0119111010.1186/s13019-024-02547-8Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantationFreya Sophie Jenkins0Jan-Philipp Minol1Tarik Akar2Esma Yilmaz3Moritz Benjamin Immohr4Ismail Dalyanoglu5Bernhard Korbmacher6Joel Aissa7Udo Boeken8Artur Lichtenberg9Payam Akhyari10Hannan Dalyanoglu11Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityMedical Faculty, Semmelweiss UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine UniversityAbstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an established treatment for end-stage left ventricular heart failure. Parameters are needed to identify the most appropriate patients for LVADs. This study aimed to evaluate pectoral muscle mass and density as prognostic parameters. Methods This single-center study included all patients with LVAD implantation between January 2010 and October 2017 and a preoperative chest CT scan. Pectoral muscle mass was assessed using the Pectoralis Muscle Index (PMI, surface area indexed to height, cm2/m2) and pectoral muscle density by Hounsfield Units (HU). Overall mortality was analyzed with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and 1-year and 3-year mortality with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression models. Results 57 patients (89.5% male, mean age 57.8 years) were included. 64.9% of patients had end-stage left ventricular failure due to ischemic heart disease and 35.1% due to dilated cardiomyopathy. 49.2% of patients had preoperative INTERMACS profile of 1 or 2 and 33.3% received mechanical circulatory support prior to LVAD implantation. Total mean PMI was 4.7 cm2/m2 (± 1.6), overall HU of the major pectoral muscle was 39.0 (± 14.9) and of the minor pectoral muscle 37.1 (± 16.6). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years (± 0.2). Mortality rates were 37.5% at 1 year and 48.0% at 3 years. Neither PMI nor HU were significantly associated with overall mortality at 1-year or 3-year. Conclusions The results of our study do not confirm the association between higher pectoral muscle mass and better survival after LVAD implantation previously described in the literature.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02547-8Left ventricular heart failureLeft ventricular assist devicePectoral muscle massFrailty
spellingShingle Freya Sophie Jenkins
Jan-Philipp Minol
Tarik Akar
Esma Yilmaz
Moritz Benjamin Immohr
Ismail Dalyanoglu
Bernhard Korbmacher
Joel Aissa
Udo Boeken
Artur Lichtenberg
Payam Akhyari
Hannan Dalyanoglu
Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Left ventricular heart failure
Left ventricular assist device
Pectoral muscle mass
Frailty
title Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation
title_full Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation
title_fullStr Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation
title_full_unstemmed Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation
title_short Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation
title_sort pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device lvad implantation
topic Left ventricular heart failure
Left ventricular assist device
Pectoral muscle mass
Frailty
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02547-8
work_keys_str_mv AT freyasophiejenkins pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT janphilippminol pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT tarikakar pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT esmayilmaz pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT moritzbenjaminimmohr pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT ismaildalyanoglu pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT bernhardkorbmacher pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT joelaissa pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT udoboeken pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT arturlichtenberg pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT payamakhyari pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation
AT hannandalyanoglu pectoralmusclemassisnotarobustprognosticfactorforsurvivalafterleftventricularassistdevicelvadimplantation