Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi

Abstract Background RTS,S/AS01 is the first vaccine against malaria to undergo pilot implementation, beginning in 2019 and vaccinating 360,000 children per year in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya. The four-dose vaccine is given as a primary three-dose series with a fourth dose given approximately 18 months...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Griffin J. Bell, Matthew S. Loop, Tisungane Mvalo, Jonathan J. Juliano, Innocent Mofolo, Portia Kamthunzi, Gerald Tegha, Marc Lievens, Jeffrey Bailey, Michael Emch, Irving Hoffman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09039-z
_version_ 1811285797787140096
author Griffin J. Bell
Matthew S. Loop
Tisungane Mvalo
Jonathan J. Juliano
Innocent Mofolo
Portia Kamthunzi
Gerald Tegha
Marc Lievens
Jeffrey Bailey
Michael Emch
Irving Hoffman
author_facet Griffin J. Bell
Matthew S. Loop
Tisungane Mvalo
Jonathan J. Juliano
Innocent Mofolo
Portia Kamthunzi
Gerald Tegha
Marc Lievens
Jeffrey Bailey
Michael Emch
Irving Hoffman
author_sort Griffin J. Bell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background RTS,S/AS01 is the first vaccine against malaria to undergo pilot implementation, beginning in 2019 and vaccinating 360,000 children per year in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya. The four-dose vaccine is given as a primary three-dose series with a fourth dose given approximately 18 months later. The efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 was variable among the 11 sites participating in the 2009–2014 phase III trial (MALARIA-055, NCT00866619 ), possibly due to differences in transmission intensity. However, a within-site examination of environmental factors related to transmission intensity and their impact on vaccine efficacy has yet to be conducted. Methods We implemented the phase III RTS,S/AS01 trial at the Malawi site, which enrolled 1578 infants (6–12 weeks) and children (5–17 months) living in the Lilongwe District in Central Malawi and followed them for 3 years between 2009 and 2014. A global positioning system survey and an ecological questionnaire were conducted to collect participant household locations and characteristics, while additional data on background malaria prevalence were obtained from a concurrent Malaria Transmission Intensity (MTI) survey. Negative binomial regression models were used to assess whether the efficacy of the vaccine varied by estimated background malaria prevalence, household roof type, or amount of nearby vegetation. Results Vaccine efficacy did not significantly vary by estimated malaria prevalence or by roof type. However, increased vegetation cover was associated with an increase in the efficacy of the three-dose primary RTS,S/AS01 series in the 18 months before the fourth dose and a decrease in the efficacy of the primary vaccine series in the second 18 months following, if the fourth dose was not given. Vegetation cover did not alter the efficacy of the fourth dose in a statistically or practically significant manner. Conclusions Vegetation coverage in this study site might be a proxy for nearness to rivers or branching, shallow wetlands called “dambos” which could serve as breeding sites for mosquitoes. We observed statistically significant modification of the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 by forest cover, suggesting that initial vaccine efficacy and the importance of the fourth dose varies based on ecological context. Trial registration Efficacy of GSK Biologicals’ Candidate Malaria Vaccine (257049) Against Malaria Disease Caused by P. falciparum Infection in Infants and Children in Africa. NCT00866619 prospectively registered 20 March 2009.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:49:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-328766c7b2d44f59928c817cbc0f1d95
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:49:19Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-328766c7b2d44f59928c817cbc0f1d952022-12-22T03:05:53ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-06-0120111110.1186/s12889-020-09039-zEnvironmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, MalawiGriffin J. Bell0Matthew S. Loop1Tisungane Mvalo2Jonathan J. Juliano3Innocent Mofolo4Portia Kamthunzi5Gerald Tegha6Marc Lievens7Jeffrey Bailey8Michael Emch9Irving Hoffman10Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North CarolinaDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North CarolinaUniversity of North CarolinaDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North CarolinaUniversity of North CarolinaUniversity of North CarolinaUniversity of North Carolina Project MalawiGlaxoSmithKline (GSK)Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North CarolinaUniversity of North CarolinaAbstract Background RTS,S/AS01 is the first vaccine against malaria to undergo pilot implementation, beginning in 2019 and vaccinating 360,000 children per year in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya. The four-dose vaccine is given as a primary three-dose series with a fourth dose given approximately 18 months later. The efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 was variable among the 11 sites participating in the 2009–2014 phase III trial (MALARIA-055, NCT00866619 ), possibly due to differences in transmission intensity. However, a within-site examination of environmental factors related to transmission intensity and their impact on vaccine efficacy has yet to be conducted. Methods We implemented the phase III RTS,S/AS01 trial at the Malawi site, which enrolled 1578 infants (6–12 weeks) and children (5–17 months) living in the Lilongwe District in Central Malawi and followed them for 3 years between 2009 and 2014. A global positioning system survey and an ecological questionnaire were conducted to collect participant household locations and characteristics, while additional data on background malaria prevalence were obtained from a concurrent Malaria Transmission Intensity (MTI) survey. Negative binomial regression models were used to assess whether the efficacy of the vaccine varied by estimated background malaria prevalence, household roof type, or amount of nearby vegetation. Results Vaccine efficacy did not significantly vary by estimated malaria prevalence or by roof type. However, increased vegetation cover was associated with an increase in the efficacy of the three-dose primary RTS,S/AS01 series in the 18 months before the fourth dose and a decrease in the efficacy of the primary vaccine series in the second 18 months following, if the fourth dose was not given. Vegetation cover did not alter the efficacy of the fourth dose in a statistically or practically significant manner. Conclusions Vegetation coverage in this study site might be a proxy for nearness to rivers or branching, shallow wetlands called “dambos” which could serve as breeding sites for mosquitoes. We observed statistically significant modification of the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 by forest cover, suggesting that initial vaccine efficacy and the importance of the fourth dose varies based on ecological context. Trial registration Efficacy of GSK Biologicals’ Candidate Malaria Vaccine (257049) Against Malaria Disease Caused by P. falciparum Infection in Infants and Children in Africa. NCT00866619 prospectively registered 20 March 2009.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09039-zMalariaVaccineAfricaSpatial analysisVaccine trialMalawi
spellingShingle Griffin J. Bell
Matthew S. Loop
Tisungane Mvalo
Jonathan J. Juliano
Innocent Mofolo
Portia Kamthunzi
Gerald Tegha
Marc Lievens
Jeffrey Bailey
Michael Emch
Irving Hoffman
Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi
BMC Public Health
Malaria
Vaccine
Africa
Spatial analysis
Vaccine trial
Malawi
title Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi
title_full Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi
title_fullStr Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi
title_short Environmental modifiers of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy in Lilongwe, Malawi
title_sort environmental modifiers of rts s as01 malaria vaccine efficacy in lilongwe malawi
topic Malaria
Vaccine
Africa
Spatial analysis
Vaccine trial
Malawi
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09039-z
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinjbell environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT matthewsloop environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT tisunganemvalo environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT jonathanjjuliano environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT innocentmofolo environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT portiakamthunzi environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT geraldtegha environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT marclievens environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT jeffreybailey environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT michaelemch environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi
AT irvinghoffman environmentalmodifiersofrtssas01malariavaccineefficacyinlilongwemalawi