Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany

Abstract Background Due to the risk of spreading epizootic diseases through rodents, pest control is mandatory in pig farming in European countries. However, there is limited research focused on rodent control practices, usage of anticoagulant rodenticides, and the acceptance of Pest Control Operato...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Odile C. Hecker, Marc Boelhauve, Marcus Mergenthaler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:Porcine Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-018-0099-0
_version_ 1819212141449707520
author Odile C. Hecker
Marc Boelhauve
Marcus Mergenthaler
author_facet Odile C. Hecker
Marc Boelhauve
Marcus Mergenthaler
author_sort Odile C. Hecker
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Due to the risk of spreading epizootic diseases through rodents, pest control is mandatory in pig farming in European countries. However, there is limited research focused on rodent control practices, usage of anticoagulant rodenticides, and the acceptance of Pest Control Operators (PCOs) in pig farming in Germany. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate current control practices in pig holdings and to analyze the potential of a financial support on the implementation of professional pest control. Results Data were collected from monitoring records of PCOs and personal interviews with farmers and PCOs. 33 of 47 farmers, who were offered the possibility to outsource rodent control to PCOs supported by financial contribution of the North Rhine-Westphalian Animal Disease Fund (TSK) for a period of 2 years, joined the project. Despite the widespread opinion that the professional would not be beneficial – the authors figured out that farmers could financially benefit in time saved and by improved rodent control measures from the work of the PCOs. Costs of pest control measures per operation on average did not differ significantly between costs incurred by employment of PCOs (1.310 € per year) and calculated costs that arise by farmers themselves (1.217 € per year). All PCOs used Difenacoum and Brodifacoum against pest infestations. In doing so, the infestation with rodents was reduced and most of the participating farmers assessed the project as successful and employ the PCOs permanently. However, mapping the farm locations to resistance areas of the Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) shows that Brodifacoum was frequently used in areas which are marked as areas that are at low risk or rather have no risk for resistance. The environmental risks, however, are increased in these areas. Conclusion The instrument of temporal start-up financing professional pest control allows ensuring the continuous engagement of PCOs after the project period. This could possibly lead to long-term effects on the individual farm hygiene and on disease prevention. Nevertheless, important research questions with regard to the application of anticoagulant rodenticides of farmers and PCOs in livestock farming and with regard to risk mitigation measures were generated, meriting further investigation.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T06:38:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-328cb0854d624f57a830703b322f0768
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5660
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T06:38:15Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Porcine Health Management
spelling doaj.art-328cb0854d624f57a830703b322f07682022-12-21T17:56:44ZengBMCPorcine Health Management2055-56602018-10-014111210.1186/s40813-018-0099-0Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in GermanyOdile C. Hecker0Marc Boelhauve1Marcus Mergenthaler2Department of Agriculture, South Westphalia University of Applied SciencesDepartment of Agriculture, South Westphalia University of Applied SciencesDepartment of Agriculture, South Westphalia University of Applied SciencesAbstract Background Due to the risk of spreading epizootic diseases through rodents, pest control is mandatory in pig farming in European countries. However, there is limited research focused on rodent control practices, usage of anticoagulant rodenticides, and the acceptance of Pest Control Operators (PCOs) in pig farming in Germany. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate current control practices in pig holdings and to analyze the potential of a financial support on the implementation of professional pest control. Results Data were collected from monitoring records of PCOs and personal interviews with farmers and PCOs. 33 of 47 farmers, who were offered the possibility to outsource rodent control to PCOs supported by financial contribution of the North Rhine-Westphalian Animal Disease Fund (TSK) for a period of 2 years, joined the project. Despite the widespread opinion that the professional would not be beneficial – the authors figured out that farmers could financially benefit in time saved and by improved rodent control measures from the work of the PCOs. Costs of pest control measures per operation on average did not differ significantly between costs incurred by employment of PCOs (1.310 € per year) and calculated costs that arise by farmers themselves (1.217 € per year). All PCOs used Difenacoum and Brodifacoum against pest infestations. In doing so, the infestation with rodents was reduced and most of the participating farmers assessed the project as successful and employ the PCOs permanently. However, mapping the farm locations to resistance areas of the Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) shows that Brodifacoum was frequently used in areas which are marked as areas that are at low risk or rather have no risk for resistance. The environmental risks, however, are increased in these areas. Conclusion The instrument of temporal start-up financing professional pest control allows ensuring the continuous engagement of PCOs after the project period. This could possibly lead to long-term effects on the individual farm hygiene and on disease prevention. Nevertheless, important research questions with regard to the application of anticoagulant rodenticides of farmers and PCOs in livestock farming and with regard to risk mitigation measures were generated, meriting further investigation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-018-0099-0Pest controlStart-up financingPest control operatorPig farmingAnticoagulant rodenticideImplementation practice
spellingShingle Odile C. Hecker
Marc Boelhauve
Marcus Mergenthaler
Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany
Porcine Health Management
Pest control
Start-up financing
Pest control operator
Pig farming
Anticoagulant rodenticide
Implementation practice
title Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany
title_full Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany
title_fullStr Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany
title_short Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany
title_sort start up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in north rhine westphalia in germany
topic Pest control
Start-up financing
Pest control operator
Pig farming
Anticoagulant rodenticide
Implementation practice
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-018-0099-0
work_keys_str_mv AT odilechecker startupfinancingofprofessionalpestcontrolinpigfarminginnorthrhinewestphaliaingermany
AT marcboelhauve startupfinancingofprofessionalpestcontrolinpigfarminginnorthrhinewestphaliaingermany
AT marcusmergenthaler startupfinancingofprofessionalpestcontrolinpigfarminginnorthrhinewestphaliaingermany