Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception

To isolate neural correlates of conscious perception (NCCs), a standard approach has been to contrast neural activity elicited by identical stimuli of which subjects are aware versus unaware. Because conscious experience is private, determining whether a stimulus was consciously perceived requires s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael A Pitts, Stephen eMetzler, Steven eHillyard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078/full
_version_ 1818517887787204608
author Michael A Pitts
Stephen eMetzler
Steven eHillyard
author_facet Michael A Pitts
Stephen eMetzler
Steven eHillyard
author_sort Michael A Pitts
collection DOAJ
description To isolate neural correlates of conscious perception (NCCs), a standard approach has been to contrast neural activity elicited by identical stimuli of which subjects are aware versus unaware. Because conscious experience is private, determining whether a stimulus was consciously perceived requires subjective report: e.g., button-presses indicating detection, visibility ratings, verbal reports, etc. This reporting requirement introduces a methodological confound when attempting to isolate NCCs: The neural processes responsible for accessing and reporting one’s percept are difficult to distinguish from those underlying the conscious percept itself. Here, we review recent attempts to circumvent this issue via a modified inattentional blindness paradigm (Pitts, Martinez, & Hillyard, 2012) and present new data from a backward masking experiment in which task-relevance and visual awareness were manipulated in a 2x2 crossed design. In agreement with our previous inattentional blindness results, stimuli that were consciously perceived yet not immediately accessed for report (aware, task-irrelevant condition) elicited a mid-latency posterior ERP negativity (~200-240ms), while stimuli that were accessed for report (aware, task-relevant condition) elicited additional components including a robust P3b (~380-480ms) subsequent to the mid-latency negativity. Overall, these results suggest that some of the NCCs identified in previous studies may be more closely linked with accessing and maintaining perceptual information for reporting purposes than with encoding the conscious percept itself. An open question is whether the remaining NCC candidate (the ERP negativity at 200-240ms) reflects visual awareness or object-based attention.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:02:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32a7c3ce689b4d3c8de67a52d8e8b1ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:02:20Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-32a7c3ce689b4d3c8de67a52d8e8b1ed2022-12-22T01:26:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-10-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078105150Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perceptionMichael A Pitts0Stephen eMetzler1Steven eHillyard2Reed CollegeReed CollegeUniversity of California San DiegoTo isolate neural correlates of conscious perception (NCCs), a standard approach has been to contrast neural activity elicited by identical stimuli of which subjects are aware versus unaware. Because conscious experience is private, determining whether a stimulus was consciously perceived requires subjective report: e.g., button-presses indicating detection, visibility ratings, verbal reports, etc. This reporting requirement introduces a methodological confound when attempting to isolate NCCs: The neural processes responsible for accessing and reporting one’s percept are difficult to distinguish from those underlying the conscious percept itself. Here, we review recent attempts to circumvent this issue via a modified inattentional blindness paradigm (Pitts, Martinez, & Hillyard, 2012) and present new data from a backward masking experiment in which task-relevance and visual awareness were manipulated in a 2x2 crossed design. In agreement with our previous inattentional blindness results, stimuli that were consciously perceived yet not immediately accessed for report (aware, task-irrelevant condition) elicited a mid-latency posterior ERP negativity (~200-240ms), while stimuli that were accessed for report (aware, task-relevant condition) elicited additional components including a robust P3b (~380-480ms) subsequent to the mid-latency negativity. Overall, these results suggest that some of the NCCs identified in previous studies may be more closely linked with accessing and maintaining perceptual information for reporting purposes than with encoding the conscious percept itself. An open question is whether the remaining NCC candidate (the ERP negativity at 200-240ms) reflects visual awareness or object-based attention.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078/fullAttentionAwarenessvanmaskingP3btask-relevance
spellingShingle Michael A Pitts
Stephen eMetzler
Steven eHillyard
Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception
Frontiers in Psychology
Attention
Awareness
van
masking
P3b
task-relevance
title Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception
title_full Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception
title_fullStr Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception
title_full_unstemmed Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception
title_short Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception
title_sort isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one s perception
topic Attention
Awareness
van
masking
P3b
task-relevance
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelapitts isolatingneuralcorrelatesofconsciousperceptionfromneuralcorrelatesofreportingonesperception
AT stephenemetzler isolatingneuralcorrelatesofconsciousperceptionfromneuralcorrelatesofreportingonesperception
AT stevenehillyard isolatingneuralcorrelatesofconsciousperceptionfromneuralcorrelatesofreportingonesperception