A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ideally, the distribution of research funding for different types of cancer should be equitable with respect to the societal burden each type of cancer imposes. These burdens can be estimated in a variety of ways; “Years of Life Lost...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carter Ashley JR, Nguyen Cecine N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/526
_version_ 1818918019871539200
author Carter Ashley JR
Nguyen Cecine N
author_facet Carter Ashley JR
Nguyen Cecine N
author_sort Carter Ashley JR
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ideally, the distribution of research funding for different types of cancer should be equitable with respect to the societal burden each type of cancer imposes. These burdens can be estimated in a variety of ways; “Years of Life Lost” (YLL) measures the severity of death in regard to the age it occurs, "Disability-Adjusted Life-Years" (DALY) estimates the effects of non-lethal disabilities incurred by disease and economic metrics focus on the losses to tax revenue, productivity or direct medical expenses. We compared research funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to a variety of burden metrics for the most common types of cancer to identify mismatches between spending and societal burden.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Research funding levels were obtained from the NCI website and information for societal health and economic burdens were collected from government databases and published reports. We calculated the funding levels per unit burden for a wide range of different cancers and burden metrics and compared these values to identify discrepancies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our analysis reveals a considerable mismatch between funding levels and burden. Some cancers are funded at levels far higher than their relative burden suggests (breast cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia) while other cancers appear underfunded (bladder, esophageal, liver, oral, pancreatic, stomach, and uterine cancers).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These discrepancies indicate that an improved method of health care research funding allocation should be investigated to better match funding levels to societal burden.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:43:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32a81096372449c49bb5f98d82c43a09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:43:19Z
publishDate 2012-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-32a81096372449c49bb5f98d82c43a092022-12-21T19:59:29ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582012-07-0112152610.1186/1471-2458-12-526A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research fundingCarter Ashley JRNguyen Cecine N<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ideally, the distribution of research funding for different types of cancer should be equitable with respect to the societal burden each type of cancer imposes. These burdens can be estimated in a variety of ways; “Years of Life Lost” (YLL) measures the severity of death in regard to the age it occurs, "Disability-Adjusted Life-Years" (DALY) estimates the effects of non-lethal disabilities incurred by disease and economic metrics focus on the losses to tax revenue, productivity or direct medical expenses. We compared research funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to a variety of burden metrics for the most common types of cancer to identify mismatches between spending and societal burden.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Research funding levels were obtained from the NCI website and information for societal health and economic burdens were collected from government databases and published reports. We calculated the funding levels per unit burden for a wide range of different cancers and burden metrics and compared these values to identify discrepancies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our analysis reveals a considerable mismatch between funding levels and burden. Some cancers are funded at levels far higher than their relative burden suggests (breast cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia) while other cancers appear underfunded (bladder, esophageal, liver, oral, pancreatic, stomach, and uterine cancers).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These discrepancies indicate that an improved method of health care research funding allocation should be investigated to better match funding levels to societal burden.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/526CancerResearch fundingYears of life lostYLLDisability adjusted life yearsDALYBurdenEconomic cost
spellingShingle Carter Ashley JR
Nguyen Cecine N
A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
BMC Public Health
Cancer
Research funding
Years of life lost
YLL
Disability adjusted life years
DALY
Burden
Economic cost
title A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
title_full A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
title_fullStr A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
title_short A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
title_sort comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding
topic Cancer
Research funding
Years of life lost
YLL
Disability adjusted life years
DALY
Burden
Economic cost
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/526
work_keys_str_mv AT carterashleyjr acomparisonofcancerburdenandresearchspendingrevealsdiscrepanciesinthedistributionofresearchfunding
AT nguyencecinen acomparisonofcancerburdenandresearchspendingrevealsdiscrepanciesinthedistributionofresearchfunding
AT carterashleyjr comparisonofcancerburdenandresearchspendingrevealsdiscrepanciesinthedistributionofresearchfunding
AT nguyencecinen comparisonofcancerburdenandresearchspendingrevealsdiscrepanciesinthedistributionofresearchfunding