Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck

Tin was a crucial commodity in prehistory to produce bronze, and knowledge of the origins of this metal is important for understanding cultural relations and the complexity and extent of trade. However, many aspects of the provenance of tin are still not resolved. A recent study in Science Advances...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Berger, Kai Kaniuth, Gerhard Brügmann, Ernst Pernicka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1211478/full
_version_ 1797754575688564736
author Daniel Berger
Kai Kaniuth
Gerhard Brügmann
Ernst Pernicka
Ernst Pernicka
author_facet Daniel Berger
Kai Kaniuth
Gerhard Brügmann
Ernst Pernicka
Ernst Pernicka
author_sort Daniel Berger
collection DOAJ
description Tin was a crucial commodity in prehistory to produce bronze, and knowledge of the origins of this metal is important for understanding cultural relations and the complexity and extent of trade. However, many aspects of the provenance of tin are still not resolved. A recent study in Science Advances 8(48) examined the historically significant tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck, which are key to the economy and long-distance trade of tin in the Late Bronze Age Mediterranean and beyond. Isotopic and chemical data of the objects was collected, from which a tin origin from Central Asia, particularly Mushiston in Tajikistan, and Anatolia was reconstructed. The study thereby proposed a solution to the long-standing riddle of tin provenance via scientific reasoning and comparative data. While this avenue of investigation is intriguing, this article maintains that the authors’ arguments do not support their far-reaching conclusions. Instead, it emphasises the similarities with Late and Middle Bronze Age tin ingots from Israel and Britain, and alternatively suggests a common origin of part of the Uluburun cargo with these items. South-west England is considered a very likely source region, but other tin ingots of the Uluburun wreck could also originate from Afghanistan and perhaps somewhere else.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:35:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32af4ace8f624ddca3c2c1eebf2ad364
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:35:22Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-32af4ace8f624ddca3c2c1eebf2ad3642023-08-04T11:54:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632023-08-011110.3389/feart.2023.12114781211478Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreckDaniel Berger0Kai Kaniuth1Gerhard Brügmann2Ernst Pernicka3Ernst Pernicka4Curt-Engelhorn-Zentrum Archäometrie, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Cultural Studies and Antiquities, Ludwig Maximilians University, München, GermanyCurt-Engelhorn-Zentrum Archäometrie, Mannheim, GermanyCurt-Engelhorn-Zentrum Archäometrie, Mannheim, GermanyInstitute of Prehistory, Early History and Medieval Archaeology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, GermanyTin was a crucial commodity in prehistory to produce bronze, and knowledge of the origins of this metal is important for understanding cultural relations and the complexity and extent of trade. However, many aspects of the provenance of tin are still not resolved. A recent study in Science Advances 8(48) examined the historically significant tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck, which are key to the economy and long-distance trade of tin in the Late Bronze Age Mediterranean and beyond. Isotopic and chemical data of the objects was collected, from which a tin origin from Central Asia, particularly Mushiston in Tajikistan, and Anatolia was reconstructed. The study thereby proposed a solution to the long-standing riddle of tin provenance via scientific reasoning and comparative data. While this avenue of investigation is intriguing, this article maintains that the authors’ arguments do not support their far-reaching conclusions. Instead, it emphasises the similarities with Late and Middle Bronze Age tin ingots from Israel and Britain, and alternatively suggests a common origin of part of the Uluburun cargo with these items. South-west England is considered a very likely source region, but other tin ingots of the Uluburun wreck could also originate from Afghanistan and perhaps somewhere else.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1211478/fulltin ingotsUluburun shipwreckLate Bronze Agetin isotopeslead isotopestin provenance
spellingShingle Daniel Berger
Kai Kaniuth
Gerhard Brügmann
Ernst Pernicka
Ernst Pernicka
Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck
Frontiers in Earth Science
tin ingots
Uluburun shipwreck
Late Bronze Age
tin isotopes
lead isotopes
tin provenance
title Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck
title_full Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck
title_fullStr Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck
title_full_unstemmed Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck
title_short Why Central Asia’s Mushiston is not a source for the Late Bronze Age tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck
title_sort why central asia s mushiston is not a source for the late bronze age tin ingots from the uluburun shipwreck
topic tin ingots
Uluburun shipwreck
Late Bronze Age
tin isotopes
lead isotopes
tin provenance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1211478/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielberger whycentralasiasmushistonisnotasourceforthelatebronzeagetiningotsfromtheuluburunshipwreck
AT kaikaniuth whycentralasiasmushistonisnotasourceforthelatebronzeagetiningotsfromtheuluburunshipwreck
AT gerhardbrugmann whycentralasiasmushistonisnotasourceforthelatebronzeagetiningotsfromtheuluburunshipwreck
AT ernstpernicka whycentralasiasmushistonisnotasourceforthelatebronzeagetiningotsfromtheuluburunshipwreck
AT ernstpernicka whycentralasiasmushistonisnotasourceforthelatebronzeagetiningotsfromtheuluburunshipwreck