The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti

Jainism proposes a unique theory of reality in which the extreme positions of absolute identity and permanence on the one hand and absolute difference and change on the other are avoided in favour of integrative ontology. Here, identity and difference as well as permanence and change are coordinated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ana BAJŽELJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2013-04-01
Series:Asian Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/245
_version_ 1797949942760734720
author Ana BAJŽELJ
author_facet Ana BAJŽELJ
author_sort Ana BAJŽELJ
collection DOAJ
description Jainism proposes a unique theory of reality in which the extreme positions of absolute identity and permanence on the one hand and absolute difference and change on the other are avoided in favour of integrative ontology. Here, identity and difference as well as permanence and change are coordinated. The vertical and horizontal descriptions of the nature of reality are reflected in the basic definitions of substance and existence. This paper examines how this ontology is outlined in the works of Kundakunda and Umāsvāti.      
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:07:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32b0e6385acc4c0cbbda1dd0b6775748
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2232-5131
2350-4226
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:07:27Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Asian Studies
spelling doaj.art-32b0e6385acc4c0cbbda1dd0b67757482023-01-18T09:02:05ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Asian Studies2232-51312350-42262013-04-011110.4312/as.2013.1.1.3-16The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and UmāsvātiAna BAJŽELJ0Department of Philosophy Faculty of Arts University of Ljubljana SloveniaJainism proposes a unique theory of reality in which the extreme positions of absolute identity and permanence on the one hand and absolute difference and change on the other are avoided in favour of integrative ontology. Here, identity and difference as well as permanence and change are coordinated. The vertical and horizontal descriptions of the nature of reality are reflected in the basic definitions of substance and existence. This paper examines how this ontology is outlined in the works of Kundakunda and Umāsvāti.       https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/245Jainismontologyidentitydifferencepermanencechange
spellingShingle Ana BAJŽELJ
The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
Asian Studies
Jainism
ontology
identity
difference
permanence
change
title The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
title_full The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
title_fullStr The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
title_full_unstemmed The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
title_short The Jain Ontological Model according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
title_sort jain ontological model according to kundakunda and umasvati
topic Jainism
ontology
identity
difference
permanence
change
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/245
work_keys_str_mv AT anabajzelj thejainontologicalmodelaccordingtokundakundaandumasvati
AT anabajzelj jainontologicalmodelaccordingtokundakundaandumasvati