Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 30/Puu-Xvi/2018 and Supreme Court Decision No. 65p/Hum/2018 Concerning the Prohibition of Concurrent Positions for Regional Representative Council Candidates (DPD)
This study aims to examine the differences between the Constitutional Court's decision and the Supreme Court's decision regarding the prohibition of concurrent positions as candidates for members of DPD, as well as the legal ramifications of these differences. This research employs the no...
Main Authors: | Riswan Rais Syarif, Sultan Alwan, Rudhi Achsoni |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/3100 |
Similar Items
-
Slovenia's Supreme Court rejects the European Court of Human Rights
by: Matej Avbelj -
A Theory of Supreme Court Nominations
by: Stewart, Charles, et al.
Published: (2005) -
The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court’s Reaction to Bolsonaro
by: Thomas Bustamante, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Analysis of the most unusual court decisions in the world practice in terms of the right to justice
by: L. Spytska
Published: (2022-12-01) -
The Supreme Court Decision on Obama Care Part 1
by: Gilbert Berdine
Published: (2013-01-01)