A randomised controlled trial of email versus mailed invitation letter in a national longitudinal survey of physicians.
Despite their low cost, the use of email invitations to distribute surveys to medical practitioners have been associated with lower response rates. This research compares the difference in response rates from using email approach plus online completion rather than a mailed invitation letter plus a c...
Main Authors: | Benjamin Harrap, Tamara Taylor, Grant Russell, Anthony Scott |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289628 |
Similar Items
-
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
by: Caitlin C. Murphy, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Email Campaign Evaluation Based on User and Mail Server Response
by: Marcin Szpyrka, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Boring emails: “You are invited to submit a manuscript for
by: Taner Kemal Erdağ
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Email service server by using the simple mail transfer protocol (SMTP) /
by: 222779 Teoh, Keng Su
Published: (2005) -
BEBAN JARINGAN SAAT MENGAKSES EMAIL DARI BEBERAPA MAIL SERVER
by: Husni Thamrin
Published: (2017-01-01)