Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study

Objective Previous research suggests a significant relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and HIV infection in women and that the risk of IPV is heightened in women with disabilities. Women with disabilities, particularly those residing in low-income and middle-income countries, may ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monika Mitra, Ilhom Akobirshoev, Anne Valentine, Rachel Jewkes, Allyala Nandakumar, Hussaini Zandam, Mark Blecher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e054782.full
_version_ 1828343076642357248
author Monika Mitra
Ilhom Akobirshoev
Anne Valentine
Rachel Jewkes
Allyala Nandakumar
Hussaini Zandam
Mark Blecher
author_facet Monika Mitra
Ilhom Akobirshoev
Anne Valentine
Rachel Jewkes
Allyala Nandakumar
Hussaini Zandam
Mark Blecher
author_sort Monika Mitra
collection DOAJ
description Objective Previous research suggests a significant relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and HIV infection in women and that the risk of IPV is heightened in women with disabilities. Women with disabilities, particularly those residing in low-income and middle-income countries, may experience additional burdens that increase their vulnerability to IPV. We aimed to examine the association between having disability and HIV infection and the risk of IPV among women in South Africa.Design Using the 2016 South Africa Demographic and Health Survey, we calculated the prevalence of IPV and conducted modified Poisson regressions to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios of experiencing IPV by disability and HIV status.Participants Our final analytical sample included 1269 ever-partnered women aged 18–49 years, who responded to the IPV module and received HIV testing.Results The prevalence of IPV was twice as high in women with disabilities with HIV infection compared with women without disabilities without HIV infection (21.2% vs 50.1%). Our unadjusted regression analysis showed that compared with women without disabilities without HIV infection, women with disabilities with HIV infection had almost four times higher odds (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.27 to 10.9, p<0.05) of experiencing IPV. It appeared that women with disabilities with HIV infection experience compounded disparity. The association was compounded, with the OR for the combination of disability status and HIV status equal to or more than the sum of each of the individual ORs.Conclusions Women with disabilities and HIV infection are at exceptionally high risk of IPV in South Africa. Given that HIV infection and disability magnify each other’s risks for IPV, targeted interventions to prevent IPV and to address the complex and varied needs of doubly marginalised populations of women with disabilities with HIV infection are critical.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:37:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32d15884d5ad45c0a1a2223e13150a87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:37:51Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj.art-32d15884d5ad45c0a1a2223e13150a872022-12-22T02:24:38ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-09-0112910.1136/bmjopen-2021-054782Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional studyMonika Mitra0Ilhom Akobirshoev1Anne Valentine2Rachel Jewkes3Allyala Nandakumar4Hussaini Zandam5Mark Blecher6Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, Massachusetts, USALurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, Massachusetts, USALurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, Massachusetts, USAGender and Health Division, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South AfricaInstitute for Global Health and Development, Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, Massachusetts, USALurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, Massachusetts, USAHealth and Social Development, National Treasury of South Africa, Cape Town, South AfricaObjective Previous research suggests a significant relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and HIV infection in women and that the risk of IPV is heightened in women with disabilities. Women with disabilities, particularly those residing in low-income and middle-income countries, may experience additional burdens that increase their vulnerability to IPV. We aimed to examine the association between having disability and HIV infection and the risk of IPV among women in South Africa.Design Using the 2016 South Africa Demographic and Health Survey, we calculated the prevalence of IPV and conducted modified Poisson regressions to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios of experiencing IPV by disability and HIV status.Participants Our final analytical sample included 1269 ever-partnered women aged 18–49 years, who responded to the IPV module and received HIV testing.Results The prevalence of IPV was twice as high in women with disabilities with HIV infection compared with women without disabilities without HIV infection (21.2% vs 50.1%). Our unadjusted regression analysis showed that compared with women without disabilities without HIV infection, women with disabilities with HIV infection had almost four times higher odds (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.27 to 10.9, p<0.05) of experiencing IPV. It appeared that women with disabilities with HIV infection experience compounded disparity. The association was compounded, with the OR for the combination of disability status and HIV status equal to or more than the sum of each of the individual ORs.Conclusions Women with disabilities and HIV infection are at exceptionally high risk of IPV in South Africa. Given that HIV infection and disability magnify each other’s risks for IPV, targeted interventions to prevent IPV and to address the complex and varied needs of doubly marginalised populations of women with disabilities with HIV infection are critical.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e054782.full
spellingShingle Monika Mitra
Ilhom Akobirshoev
Anne Valentine
Rachel Jewkes
Allyala Nandakumar
Hussaini Zandam
Mark Blecher
Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study
BMJ Open
title Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study
title_full Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study
title_short Disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and HIV status in South Africa: a cross-sectional study
title_sort disparities in intimate partner violence among women at the intersection of disability and hiv status in south africa a cross sectional study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e054782.full
work_keys_str_mv AT monikamitra disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ilhomakobirshoev disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy
AT annevalentine disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy
AT racheljewkes disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy
AT allyalanandakumar disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy
AT hussainizandam disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy
AT markblecher disparitiesinintimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenattheintersectionofdisabilityandhivstatusinsouthafricaacrosssectionalstudy