Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in management of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label prospective study that included a total of 80...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Urology Annals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=2;spage=165;epage=169;aulast=Mhaske |
| _version_ | 1819260037930942464 |
|---|---|
| author | Sunil Mhaske Mehul Singh Abhirudra Mulay Sharadkumar Kankalia Vikram Satav Vilas Sabale |
| author_facet | Sunil Mhaske Mehul Singh Abhirudra Mulay Sharadkumar Kankalia Vikram Satav Vilas Sabale |
| author_sort | Sunil Mhaske |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in management of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm.
Materials and Methods: This was an open-label prospective study that included a total of 80 cases underwent mini-perc (n = 40) and RIRS (n = 40) between July 2014 and August 2017. The primary outcome objective was stone-free rate, retreatment rate, complications, hospital stay, operative time, and reduction in hemoglobin level. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 Software.
Results: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 40.12 and 38.20 years, and the mean stone size was 1.15 and 1.30 cm in mini-perc and RIRS group, respectively. Majority of the study participants were males. Overall, mini-perc and RIRS had stone clearance rates of 100% and 95.4%, respectively. Two patients required retreatment in RIRS group. The duration of hospital stay and the rate of complication was similar in both the groups. Operative duration was more in RIRS group. Decrease in hemoglobin level was more in mini-perc group.
Conclusions: Results demonstrated that both modalities were associated with high stone clearance rates with minimal complications. RIRS was associated with less reduction in hemoglobin and could be used as standard treatment modality for small renal calculi. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T19:19:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-32f3ede5b4284e2c8417a6247d4926dc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0974-7796 0974-7834 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T19:19:33Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Urology Annals |
| spelling | doaj.art-32f3ede5b4284e2c8417a6247d4926dc2022-12-21T17:34:12ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342018-01-0110216516910.4103/UA.UA_156_17Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective studySunil MhaskeMehul SinghAbhirudra MulaySharadkumar KankaliaVikram SatavVilas SabaleAim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in management of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label prospective study that included a total of 80 cases underwent mini-perc (n = 40) and RIRS (n = 40) between July 2014 and August 2017. The primary outcome objective was stone-free rate, retreatment rate, complications, hospital stay, operative time, and reduction in hemoglobin level. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 Software. Results: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 40.12 and 38.20 years, and the mean stone size was 1.15 and 1.30 cm in mini-perc and RIRS group, respectively. Majority of the study participants were males. Overall, mini-perc and RIRS had stone clearance rates of 100% and 95.4%, respectively. Two patients required retreatment in RIRS group. The duration of hospital stay and the rate of complication was similar in both the groups. Operative duration was more in RIRS group. Decrease in hemoglobin level was more in mini-perc group. Conclusions: Results demonstrated that both modalities were associated with high stone clearance rates with minimal complications. RIRS was associated with less reduction in hemoglobin and could be used as standard treatment modality for small renal calculi.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=2;spage=165;epage=169;aulast=MhaskeMini-percretrograde intrarenal surgerysmall renal calculi |
| spellingShingle | Sunil Mhaske Mehul Singh Abhirudra Mulay Sharadkumar Kankalia Vikram Satav Vilas Sabale Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study Urology Annals Mini-perc retrograde intrarenal surgery small renal calculi |
| title | Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study |
| title_full | Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study |
| title_fullStr | Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study |
| title_short | Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study |
| title_sort | miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter 15 mm a 3 year open label prospective study |
| topic | Mini-perc retrograde intrarenal surgery small renal calculi |
| url | http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=2;spage=165;epage=169;aulast=Mhaske |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sunilmhaske miniaturizedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryinthetreatmentofrenalstoneswithadiameter15mma3yearopenlabelprospectivestudy AT mehulsingh miniaturizedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryinthetreatmentofrenalstoneswithadiameter15mma3yearopenlabelprospectivestudy AT abhirudramulay miniaturizedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryinthetreatmentofrenalstoneswithadiameter15mma3yearopenlabelprospectivestudy AT sharadkumarkankalia miniaturizedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryinthetreatmentofrenalstoneswithadiameter15mma3yearopenlabelprospectivestudy AT vikramsatav miniaturizedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryinthetreatmentofrenalstoneswithadiameter15mma3yearopenlabelprospectivestudy AT vilassabale miniaturizedpercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryinthetreatmentofrenalstoneswithadiameter15mma3yearopenlabelprospectivestudy |