Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis

Background: Enthesopathy is a main characteristic of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, ultrasonographic features of supraspinous enthesis in AS have not yet been reported. Methods: Forty-seven AS patients and 22 healthy individuals were enrolled and completed the study. L4 supraspinous entheses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuo-Lung Lai, Fang-Chuan Kuo, Chih-Wei Tseng, Hsin-Hua Chen, Yin-Yin Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2021;volume=29;issue=1;spage=32;epage=38;aulast=
_version_ 1818734758699466752
author Kuo-Lung Lai
Fang-Chuan Kuo
Chih-Wei Tseng
Hsin-Hua Chen
Yin-Yin Liao
author_facet Kuo-Lung Lai
Fang-Chuan Kuo
Chih-Wei Tseng
Hsin-Hua Chen
Yin-Yin Liao
author_sort Kuo-Lung Lai
collection DOAJ
description Background: Enthesopathy is a main characteristic of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, ultrasonographic features of supraspinous enthesis in AS have not yet been reported. Methods: Forty-seven AS patients and 22 healthy individuals were enrolled and completed the study. L4 supraspinous entheses were assessed through an ultrasound (US) unit with the participants in a lateral decubitus position. Entheseal echogenicity was interpreted upon inspection of the US image. An entheseal grayscale (GS) value determination, along with an echotexture analysis using a gray-level co-occurrence matrix algorithm, was performed. The thoracolumbar fascia just above the enthesis was also analyzed. An enthesis-to-fascia ratio (EFR) of each texture feature was used for the purpose of intergroup comparison. Results: The prevalence of abnormal entheseal echogenicity in the AS and healthy groups was 19.1% and 13.6%, respectively (P = 0.42). The AS group experienced a higher GS EFR (0.56 [0.10–1.08] vs. 0.40 [0.12–0.89], P = 0.007), higher contrast EFR (0.62 [0.15–1.23] vs. 0.49 [0.23–1.33], P = 0.049), higher variance EFR (0.44 [0.06–1.21] vs. 0.35 [0.13–1.10], P = 0.023), and lower homogeneity EFR (1.07 [0.97–1.27] vs. 1.11 [1.04–1.19], P = 0.011) in comparison to the healthy group. Conclusion: Echotexture analysis identified the subtle structural changes in L4 supraspinous enthesis in AS patients. It proved to be superior to the inspection method and may possess the potential for providing early detection of supraspinous enthesopathy in AS.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T00:10:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32f736bd2bab45aa99aac0ab1854127b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0929-6441
2212-1552
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T00:10:27Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Ultrasound
spelling doaj.art-32f736bd2bab45aa99aac0ab1854127b2022-12-21T21:27:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Ultrasound0929-64412212-15522021-01-01291323810.4103/JMU.JMU_37_20Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitisKuo-Lung LaiFang-Chuan KuoChih-Wei TsengHsin-Hua ChenYin-Yin LiaoBackground: Enthesopathy is a main characteristic of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, ultrasonographic features of supraspinous enthesis in AS have not yet been reported. Methods: Forty-seven AS patients and 22 healthy individuals were enrolled and completed the study. L4 supraspinous entheses were assessed through an ultrasound (US) unit with the participants in a lateral decubitus position. Entheseal echogenicity was interpreted upon inspection of the US image. An entheseal grayscale (GS) value determination, along with an echotexture analysis using a gray-level co-occurrence matrix algorithm, was performed. The thoracolumbar fascia just above the enthesis was also analyzed. An enthesis-to-fascia ratio (EFR) of each texture feature was used for the purpose of intergroup comparison. Results: The prevalence of abnormal entheseal echogenicity in the AS and healthy groups was 19.1% and 13.6%, respectively (P = 0.42). The AS group experienced a higher GS EFR (0.56 [0.10–1.08] vs. 0.40 [0.12–0.89], P = 0.007), higher contrast EFR (0.62 [0.15–1.23] vs. 0.49 [0.23–1.33], P = 0.049), higher variance EFR (0.44 [0.06–1.21] vs. 0.35 [0.13–1.10], P = 0.023), and lower homogeneity EFR (1.07 [0.97–1.27] vs. 1.11 [1.04–1.19], P = 0.011) in comparison to the healthy group. Conclusion: Echotexture analysis identified the subtle structural changes in L4 supraspinous enthesis in AS patients. It proved to be superior to the inspection method and may possess the potential for providing early detection of supraspinous enthesopathy in AS.http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2021;volume=29;issue=1;spage=32;epage=38;aulast=ankylosing spondylitisechotexture analysisenthesopathysupraspinous enthesisultrasonography
spellingShingle Kuo-Lung Lai
Fang-Chuan Kuo
Chih-Wei Tseng
Hsin-Hua Chen
Yin-Yin Liao
Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
Journal of Medical Ultrasound
ankylosing spondylitis
echotexture analysis
enthesopathy
supraspinous enthesis
ultrasonography
title Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
title_full Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
title_fullStr Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
title_full_unstemmed Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
title_short Echotexture analysis of L4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
title_sort echotexture analysis of l4 supraspinous enthesis in ankylosing spondylitis
topic ankylosing spondylitis
echotexture analysis
enthesopathy
supraspinous enthesis
ultrasonography
url http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2021;volume=29;issue=1;spage=32;epage=38;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT kuolunglai echotextureanalysisofl4supraspinousenthesisinankylosingspondylitis
AT fangchuankuo echotextureanalysisofl4supraspinousenthesisinankylosingspondylitis
AT chihweitseng echotextureanalysisofl4supraspinousenthesisinankylosingspondylitis
AT hsinhuachen echotextureanalysisofl4supraspinousenthesisinankylosingspondylitis
AT yinyinliao echotextureanalysisofl4supraspinousenthesisinankylosingspondylitis