ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY

The article offers a historiographical consideration of the description of the Khotyn battle 1621with an emphasis on the historical value of M. Kostin's “Chronicle of the Land of Moldova” in the coverage of the event. The relevance of the study is dictated by the 400th anniversary of the ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoniy MOYSEY, Arkadiy MOІSEY
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bukovinian State Medical university 2021-06-01
Series:Актуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини
Subjects:
Online Access:http://apsnim.bsmu.edu.ua/home/2_2021/moysey_moisei
_version_ 1828331367370326016
author Antoniy MOYSEY
Arkadiy MOІSEY
author_facet Antoniy MOYSEY
Arkadiy MOІSEY
author_sort Antoniy MOYSEY
collection DOAJ
description The article offers a historiographical consideration of the description of the Khotyn battle 1621with an emphasis on the historical value of M. Kostin's “Chronicle of the Land of Moldova” in the coverage of the event. The relevance of the study is dictated by the 400th anniversary of the battle. The purpose of the study is to clarify the historical significance of the chronicle in revealing the theme of the Battle of Khotyn in 1621. Methodology describes the work of M. Kostin, its source base, comparison with other historical sources, review of its use. Conclusions. “Chronicle of the Land of Moldova” by Myron Kostin, being the only source for studying the history of Moldova in the early and mid seventeenth century. at the same time it is a true description of the events of the Khotyn War (1620–1621). Although the chronicler is not a contemporary of the events, his account of the Battle of Khotyn is based on serious Polish sources of the relevant era, oral information from contemporaries of the fighting, the traditions of the princely family of Movileshty, and so on. The work is positively characterized by a deep and detailed description of events, impartiality, clear analysis of military operations of a participant in many battles, education of the author and his broad outlook, which allowed him to understand the causal links of actions, actions of the parties, unconditional literary talent M. Kostin. His disregard for the events of the Khotyn War of 1621 by a number of Ukrainian historians shows a reluctance to consider the event comprehensively, using all sources. Moreover, we see a focus on showing only one fragment of this historical event, the participation of the Ukrainian side in it. The language barrier to the use of the Chronicle is no more a problem than a political motive.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:51:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32f8fc8b5a734ef8a0dc9d28eeea7ec9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-9896
2411-6181
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:51:31Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Bukovinian State Medical university
record_format Article
series Актуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини
spelling doaj.art-32f8fc8b5a734ef8a0dc9d28eeea7ec92022-12-22T02:30:28ZengBukovinian State Medical universityАктуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини2311-98962411-61812021-06-012(30)444810.24061/2411-6181.2.2021.266ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHYAntoniy MOYSEY0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5295-2271Arkadiy MOІSEY1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5295-2271Bukovinian State Medical UniversityRomanian Cultural Center E. HurmuzakiThe article offers a historiographical consideration of the description of the Khotyn battle 1621with an emphasis on the historical value of M. Kostin's “Chronicle of the Land of Moldova” in the coverage of the event. The relevance of the study is dictated by the 400th anniversary of the battle. The purpose of the study is to clarify the historical significance of the chronicle in revealing the theme of the Battle of Khotyn in 1621. Methodology describes the work of M. Kostin, its source base, comparison with other historical sources, review of its use. Conclusions. “Chronicle of the Land of Moldova” by Myron Kostin, being the only source for studying the history of Moldova in the early and mid seventeenth century. at the same time it is a true description of the events of the Khotyn War (1620–1621). Although the chronicler is not a contemporary of the events, his account of the Battle of Khotyn is based on serious Polish sources of the relevant era, oral information from contemporaries of the fighting, the traditions of the princely family of Movileshty, and so on. The work is positively characterized by a deep and detailed description of events, impartiality, clear analysis of military operations of a participant in many battles, education of the author and his broad outlook, which allowed him to understand the causal links of actions, actions of the parties, unconditional literary talent M. Kostin. His disregard for the events of the Khotyn War of 1621 by a number of Ukrainian historians shows a reluctance to consider the event comprehensively, using all sources. Moreover, we see a focus on showing only one fragment of this historical event, the participation of the Ukrainian side in it. The language barrier to the use of the Chronicle is no more a problem than a political motive.http://apsnim.bsmu.edu.ua/home/2_2021/moysey_moiseibattle of khotyn in 1621participants and contemporaries of the battlehistoriography of the event“chronicle of the land of moldova” by m. kostinmyron kostinhistorical sources
spellingShingle Antoniy MOYSEY
Arkadiy MOІSEY
ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
Актуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини
battle of khotyn in 1621
participants and contemporaries of the battle
historiography of the event
“chronicle of the land of moldova” by m. kostin
myron kostin
historical sources
title ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
title_full ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
title_fullStr ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
title_full_unstemmed ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
title_short ХОТИНСЬКА БИТВА 1621 РОКУ. ІГНОРОВАНЕ ДЖЕРЕЛО В УКРАЇНСЬКІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ/ KHOTYN BATTLE 1621. IGNORED SOURCE IN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
title_sort хотинська битва 1621 року ігнороване джерело в українській історіографії khotyn battle 1621 ignored source in ukrainian historiography
topic battle of khotyn in 1621
participants and contemporaries of the battle
historiography of the event
“chronicle of the land of moldova” by m. kostin
myron kostin
historical sources
url http://apsnim.bsmu.edu.ua/home/2_2021/moysey_moisei
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniymoysey hotinsʹkabitva1621rokuígnorovanedžerelovukraínsʹkíjístoríografííkhotynbattle1621ignoredsourceinukrainianhistoriography
AT arkadiymoísey hotinsʹkabitva1621rokuígnorovanedžerelovukraínsʹkíjístoríografííkhotynbattle1621ignoredsourceinukrainianhistoriography