Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source

The detection of contaminating mycoplasma in a NS-1 myeloma celI line was studied comparing three methods The probable source of mycoplasma contamination were some batches of commercial sera Fetal Bovine Sera (FBS) mouse myeloma NS-1 cells and Vero celIs (African green monkey) were cultured on PPLO...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Willian Cornejo M., Libertad Alzamora G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 2014-06-01
Series:Revista Peruana de Biología
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/8335
_version_ 1811240128593526784
author Willian Cornejo M.
Libertad Alzamora G.
author_facet Willian Cornejo M.
Libertad Alzamora G.
author_sort Willian Cornejo M.
collection DOAJ
description The detection of contaminating mycoplasma in a NS-1 myeloma celI line was studied comparing three methods The probable source of mycoplasma contamination were some batches of commercial sera Fetal Bovine Sera (FBS) mouse myeloma NS-1 cells and Vero celIs (African green monkey) were cultured on PPLO medium. The other methods involved the use of an indicator cell culture system (Vero cells) and the DNA-fluorochrome staining technique. The bacteriological procedure for the isolation of mycoplasma was successful with NS-l and Vero celIs, but not with FBS. However, mycoplasma colonies with typical "fried egg" appearance were only observed with Vero celIs. Moreover, the number of colonies isolated could be appreciated only after 18 days of growth. Vero tested, showed cytopathic effect (CPE). Initial1y, dark grasules appeared in the cytoplasm of the cells. At the 5th or 7th day, cell membranes showed small linger-like projections and vacuolization. By the 3rd or 4th week, the CPE was more pronounced. Monolayers of Vero cells were a1so grown on coverslips for 2 to 5 days and were stained with Hoechts DNA: fluorescent stain. The cells show discrete zones of fluorescence in the cytoplasm and nuclei. The: fluorescent spots were time-dependent Hoechst technique appears to be the method 01 choice, since it is more efficient, less time consuming and simpler.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:13:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32f981dce23f4262beb8ff2788fba1f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1561-0837
1727-9933
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:13:56Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
record_format Article
series Revista Peruana de Biología
spelling doaj.art-32f981dce23f4262beb8ff2788fba1f52022-12-22T03:31:46ZengUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San MarcosRevista Peruana de Biología1561-08371727-99332014-06-0141-2253510.15381/rpb.v4i1-2.83357422Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination sourceWillian Cornejo M.0Libertad Alzamora G.1Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad nacional Mayor de San MarcosInstituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas "Antonio Raimondl", Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad nacional Mayor de San MarcosThe detection of contaminating mycoplasma in a NS-1 myeloma celI line was studied comparing three methods The probable source of mycoplasma contamination were some batches of commercial sera Fetal Bovine Sera (FBS) mouse myeloma NS-1 cells and Vero celIs (African green monkey) were cultured on PPLO medium. The other methods involved the use of an indicator cell culture system (Vero cells) and the DNA-fluorochrome staining technique. The bacteriological procedure for the isolation of mycoplasma was successful with NS-l and Vero celIs, but not with FBS. However, mycoplasma colonies with typical "fried egg" appearance were only observed with Vero celIs. Moreover, the number of colonies isolated could be appreciated only after 18 days of growth. Vero tested, showed cytopathic effect (CPE). Initial1y, dark grasules appeared in the cytoplasm of the cells. At the 5th or 7th day, cell membranes showed small linger-like projections and vacuolization. By the 3rd or 4th week, the CPE was more pronounced. Monolayers of Vero cells were a1so grown on coverslips for 2 to 5 days and were stained with Hoechts DNA: fluorescent stain. The cells show discrete zones of fluorescence in the cytoplasm and nuclei. The: fluorescent spots were time-dependent Hoechst technique appears to be the method 01 choice, since it is more efficient, less time consuming and simpler.http://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/8335micoplasma
spellingShingle Willian Cornejo M.
Libertad Alzamora G.
Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
Revista Peruana de Biología
micoplasma
title Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
title_full Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
title_fullStr Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
title_full_unstemmed Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
title_short Mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
title_sort mycoplasma detection in a mouse cell line and possible contamination source
topic micoplasma
url http://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/8335
work_keys_str_mv AT williancornejom mycoplasmadetectioninamousecelllineandpossiblecontaminationsource
AT libertadalzamorag mycoplasmadetectioninamousecelllineandpossiblecontaminationsource