Does blame always shift? A critical commentary
The manuscript is a critical commentary on the article ‘Does blame always shift? Examining the impact of workplace safety communication language on post-accident blame attributions for multiple entities’. In this commentary, I find that the reasoning provided for the non-shifting of blame across ent...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2024-06-01
|
Series: | Acta Psychologica |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824001495 |
_version_ | 1797210087840808960 |
---|---|
author | Vivek Khanna |
author_facet | Vivek Khanna |
author_sort | Vivek Khanna |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The manuscript is a critical commentary on the article ‘Does blame always shift? Examining the impact of workplace safety communication language on post-accident blame attributions for multiple entities’. In this commentary, I find that the reasoning provided for the non-shifting of blame across entities in the causal chain is not adequate. I use a zero-sum game analogy for blame attributions to provide evidence for this inadequacy. In this commentary, I further point out that the focal article does not account for the similarities and dissimilarities between the people making the attributions and the people against whom attributions are being made. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:05:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3304a6ded8e8464d9e341c37a3d7f7e7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0001-6918 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:05:01Z |
publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Psychologica |
spelling | doaj.art-3304a6ded8e8464d9e341c37a3d7f7e72024-04-13T04:20:54ZengElsevierActa Psychologica0001-69182024-06-01246104272Does blame always shift? A critical commentaryVivek Khanna0Department of Organizational Behavior and HRM, Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence (Deemed to be a University), IndiaThe manuscript is a critical commentary on the article ‘Does blame always shift? Examining the impact of workplace safety communication language on post-accident blame attributions for multiple entities’. In this commentary, I find that the reasoning provided for the non-shifting of blame across entities in the causal chain is not adequate. I use a zero-sum game analogy for blame attributions to provide evidence for this inadequacy. In this commentary, I further point out that the focal article does not account for the similarities and dissimilarities between the people making the attributions and the people against whom attributions are being made.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824001495 |
spellingShingle | Vivek Khanna Does blame always shift? A critical commentary Acta Psychologica |
title | Does blame always shift? A critical commentary |
title_full | Does blame always shift? A critical commentary |
title_fullStr | Does blame always shift? A critical commentary |
title_full_unstemmed | Does blame always shift? A critical commentary |
title_short | Does blame always shift? A critical commentary |
title_sort | does blame always shift a critical commentary |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824001495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vivekkhanna doesblamealwaysshiftacriticalcommentary |