| Summary: | BackgroundAccurate evaluation of the risk of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is the key to treatment. However, the maximum diameter (MD), which is currently used in various staging systems, may not truly reflect the aggressiveness of multifocal tumors.MethodsClinical and pathological data for 1001 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent surgery at the Hangzhou First People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. First, the relationship between total tumor diameter (TTD) and clinicopathological features in multifocal PTMC was explored. Then, patients were divided into subgroups according to the TTD. The baseline was consistent after using the propensity score matching method, and the differences between groups were compared. In addition, the effectiveness of TTD and MD in evaluating central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) was analyzed and compared.ResultsTTD is associated with a range of clinicopathological features, including lymph node metastasis, extrathyroidal extension, and risk stratification. Assuming the same MD and number of foci, the invasiveness of multifocal PTMC with TTD >1 cm was significantly higher than that with TTD <1 cm, and even higher than unifocal non-PTMC. Moreover, the efficiency of TTD in predicting CLNM was also significantly higher than that of MD.ConclusionFor multifocal PTMC, TTD is a more realistic indicator of tumor biological characteristics than MD. The aggressiveness of PTMC with TTD >1 cm was significantly enhanced, and surgical treatment should be actively sought in such cases.
|
|---|