A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI

IntroductionComputational models play an increasingly important role in describing variation in neural activation in human neuroimaging experiments, including evaluating individual differences in the context of psychiatric neuroimaging. In particular, reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henry W. Chase
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211528/full
_version_ 1797384200980004864
author Henry W. Chase
author_facet Henry W. Chase
author_sort Henry W. Chase
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionComputational models play an increasingly important role in describing variation in neural activation in human neuroimaging experiments, including evaluating individual differences in the context of psychiatric neuroimaging. In particular, reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have been widely adopted to examine neural responses to reward prediction errors and stimulus or action values, and how these might vary as a function of clinical status. However, there is a lack of consensus around the importance of the precision of free parameter estimation for these methods, particularly with regard to the learning rate. In the present study, I introduce a novel technique which may be used within a general linear model (GLM) to model the effect of mis-estimation of the learning rate on reward prediction error (RPE)-related neural responses.MethodsSimulations employed a simple RL algorithm, which was used to generate hypothetical neural activations that would be expected to be observed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of RL. Similar RL models were incorporated within a GLM-based analysis method including derivatives, with individual differences in the resulting GLM-derived beta parameters being evaluated with respect to the free parameters of the RL model or being submitted to other validation analyses.ResultsInitial simulations demonstrated that the conventional approach to fitting RL models to RPE responses is more likely to reflect individual differences in a reinforcement efficacy construct (lambda) rather than learning rate (alpha). The proposed method, adding a derivative regressor to the GLM, provides a second regressor which reflects the learning rate. Validation analyses were performed including examining another comparable method which yielded highly similar results, and a demonstration of sensitivity of the method in presence of fMRI-like noise.ConclusionOverall, the findings underscore the importance of the lambda parameter for interpreting individual differences in RPE-coupled neural activity, and validate a novel neural metric of the modulation of such activity by individual differences in the learning rate. The method is expected to find application in understanding aberrant reinforcement learning across different psychiatric patient groups including major depression and substance use disorder.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:32:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-332355a5be59459c9a71e66e8e46436c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:32:57Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-332355a5be59459c9a71e66e8e46436c2023-12-21T04:48:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-12-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.12115281211528A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRIHenry W. ChaseIntroductionComputational models play an increasingly important role in describing variation in neural activation in human neuroimaging experiments, including evaluating individual differences in the context of psychiatric neuroimaging. In particular, reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have been widely adopted to examine neural responses to reward prediction errors and stimulus or action values, and how these might vary as a function of clinical status. However, there is a lack of consensus around the importance of the precision of free parameter estimation for these methods, particularly with regard to the learning rate. In the present study, I introduce a novel technique which may be used within a general linear model (GLM) to model the effect of mis-estimation of the learning rate on reward prediction error (RPE)-related neural responses.MethodsSimulations employed a simple RL algorithm, which was used to generate hypothetical neural activations that would be expected to be observed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of RL. Similar RL models were incorporated within a GLM-based analysis method including derivatives, with individual differences in the resulting GLM-derived beta parameters being evaluated with respect to the free parameters of the RL model or being submitted to other validation analyses.ResultsInitial simulations demonstrated that the conventional approach to fitting RL models to RPE responses is more likely to reflect individual differences in a reinforcement efficacy construct (lambda) rather than learning rate (alpha). The proposed method, adding a derivative regressor to the GLM, provides a second regressor which reflects the learning rate. Validation analyses were performed including examining another comparable method which yielded highly similar results, and a demonstration of sensitivity of the method in presence of fMRI-like noise.ConclusionOverall, the findings underscore the importance of the lambda parameter for interpreting individual differences in RPE-coupled neural activity, and validate a novel neural metric of the modulation of such activity by individual differences in the learning rate. The method is expected to find application in understanding aberrant reinforcement learning across different psychiatric patient groups including major depression and substance use disorder.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211528/fullreinforcement learningreinforcement sensitivityprediction errorsfMRIgeneral linear model
spellingShingle Henry W. Chase
A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI
Frontiers in Psychology
reinforcement learning
reinforcement sensitivity
prediction errors
fMRI
general linear model
title A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI
title_full A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI
title_fullStr A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI
title_full_unstemmed A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI
title_short A novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model-based fMRI
title_sort novel technique for delineating the effect of variation in the learning rate on the neural correlates of reward prediction errors in model based fmri
topic reinforcement learning
reinforcement sensitivity
prediction errors
fMRI
general linear model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211528/full
work_keys_str_mv AT henrywchase anoveltechniquefordelineatingtheeffectofvariationinthelearningrateontheneuralcorrelatesofrewardpredictionerrorsinmodelbasedfmri
AT henrywchase noveltechniquefordelineatingtheeffectofvariationinthelearningrateontheneuralcorrelatesofrewardpredictionerrorsinmodelbasedfmri