Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the results and the effectivity of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohisteropexy with or without Burch colposuspension in pelvic organ prolapse with or wihout urinary incontinence patients in our clinic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 2011 to January 2015...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: İlknur İnegöl Gümüş, Önder Sürgit, Nilüfer Akgün, İkbal Kaygusuz, Deniz Hızlı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Network 2016-01-01
Series:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/6
_version_ 1797911368378089472
author İlknur İnegöl Gümüş
Önder Sürgit
Nilüfer Akgün
İkbal Kaygusuz
Deniz Hızlı
author_facet İlknur İnegöl Gümüş
Önder Sürgit
Nilüfer Akgün
İkbal Kaygusuz
Deniz Hızlı
author_sort İlknur İnegöl Gümüş
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the results and the effectivity of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohisteropexy with or without Burch colposuspension in pelvic organ prolapse with or wihout urinary incontinence patients in our clinic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 2011 to January 2015 we performed laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy with or without Burch colposuspension for pelvic organ prolapse in 36 selected patients. Demographic and clinical data, intraoperative findings and postoperative course were recorded. POP-Q examination was used for pelvic prolapsed patients. Burch colposuspension was added to patients if they had stress urinary incontinence proven with physically examination and urodinamic tests. Twenty two patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy and 14 patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy with Burch colposuspension. RESULTS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without Burch colposuspension (Group 1) (n=22) group’s mean operation time and the mean blood loss were 51.1±11.8 minutes (range: 40-85 min.) and 39.3±13.9 cc (range: 30-70 cc) respectively. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension (Group 2) (n=14) group’s mean operation time and the mean blood loss were 88.5±13.5 minutes (range: 85-100 min.) and 65.0±11.0 (range: 60-80 cc) respectively (for mean operation time p=<0.001, for mean blood loss p=<0.001). Nine of the patients had operations with uterus preservation. All patients were discharged the following day. In Group 2 two patients developed denovo detrusor instability and improved with the administration of oxybutynin. In group 1 postoperatively, 8 patients developed denovo urinary incontinence. In the treatment of this condition we have added two patients Burch colposuspension operations, 6 patients underwent transobturatuar tape TOT. Two patients did not want to have reoperations, they received medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy or sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension offer minimally invasive approaches and excellent definitive treatment option for patients with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence with long-term success rates ranging from 93-99%. In our study, our data shows that laparoscopic approaches for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence effective in hysterectomized or non-hysterectomized patients. Long-term prospective studies may provide additional useful data for these procedures.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T11:39:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-33275f05ce924d6abca390ebd17ec018
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1300-4751
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T11:39:26Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Medical Network
record_format Article
series Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
spelling doaj.art-33275f05ce924d6abca390ebd17ec0182023-02-15T16:17:36ZengMedical NetworkGynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine1300-47512016-01-012136Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinicİlknur İnegöl Gümüş0Önder Sürgit1Nilüfer Akgün2İkbal Kaygusuz3Deniz Hızlı4Turgut Özal University Medical School Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AnkaraTurgut Özal University Medical School Department of General Surgery, AnkaraTurgut Özal University Medical School Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AnkaraTurgut Özal University Medical School Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AnkaraTurgut Özal University Medical School Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AnkaraOBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the results and the effectivity of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohisteropexy with or without Burch colposuspension in pelvic organ prolapse with or wihout urinary incontinence patients in our clinic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 2011 to January 2015 we performed laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy with or without Burch colposuspension for pelvic organ prolapse in 36 selected patients. Demographic and clinical data, intraoperative findings and postoperative course were recorded. POP-Q examination was used for pelvic prolapsed patients. Burch colposuspension was added to patients if they had stress urinary incontinence proven with physically examination and urodinamic tests. Twenty two patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy and 14 patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy with Burch colposuspension. RESULTS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without Burch colposuspension (Group 1) (n=22) group’s mean operation time and the mean blood loss were 51.1±11.8 minutes (range: 40-85 min.) and 39.3±13.9 cc (range: 30-70 cc) respectively. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension (Group 2) (n=14) group’s mean operation time and the mean blood loss were 88.5±13.5 minutes (range: 85-100 min.) and 65.0±11.0 (range: 60-80 cc) respectively (for mean operation time p=<0.001, for mean blood loss p=<0.001). Nine of the patients had operations with uterus preservation. All patients were discharged the following day. In Group 2 two patients developed denovo detrusor instability and improved with the administration of oxybutynin. In group 1 postoperatively, 8 patients developed denovo urinary incontinence. In the treatment of this condition we have added two patients Burch colposuspension operations, 6 patients underwent transobturatuar tape TOT. Two patients did not want to have reoperations, they received medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy or sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension offer minimally invasive approaches and excellent definitive treatment option for patients with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence with long-term success rates ranging from 93-99%. In our study, our data shows that laparoscopic approaches for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence effective in hysterectomized or non-hysterectomized patients. Long-term prospective studies may provide additional useful data for these procedures.http://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/6Pelvic organ prolapse, Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohisteropexy, Burch colposuspension, Urinary incontinence
spellingShingle İlknur İnegöl Gümüş
Önder Sürgit
Nilüfer Akgün
İkbal Kaygusuz
Deniz Hızlı
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic
Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
Pelvic organ prolapse, Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohisteropexy, Burch colposuspension, Urinary incontinence
title Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic
title_full Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic
title_short Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy with or Without Burch Colposuspension: The Results of 36 Patients in Our Clinic
title_sort laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy with or without burch colposuspension the results of 36 patients in our clinic
topic Pelvic organ prolapse, Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohisteropexy, Burch colposuspension, Urinary incontinence
url http://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/6
work_keys_str_mv AT ilknurinegolgumus laparoscopicsacrocolpopexyorsacrohysteropexywithorwithoutburchcolposuspensiontheresultsof36patientsinourclinic
AT ondersurgit laparoscopicsacrocolpopexyorsacrohysteropexywithorwithoutburchcolposuspensiontheresultsof36patientsinourclinic
AT niluferakgun laparoscopicsacrocolpopexyorsacrohysteropexywithorwithoutburchcolposuspensiontheresultsof36patientsinourclinic
AT ikbalkaygusuz laparoscopicsacrocolpopexyorsacrohysteropexywithorwithoutburchcolposuspensiontheresultsof36patientsinourclinic
AT denizhızlı laparoscopicsacrocolpopexyorsacrohysteropexywithorwithoutburchcolposuspensiontheresultsof36patientsinourclinic