The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally

Abstract Background The aim of this work was to develop a National Evaluation Framework to facilitate the standardization of delivery, quality, reporting, and evaluation of diabetes education and support programs delivered throughout Australia through the National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS). Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jenny Louise Olson, Becky White, Helen Mitchell, Jennifer Halliday, Timothy Skinner, Deborah Schofield, Jennifer Sweeting, Natasha Watson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07374-4
_version_ 1798026288647110656
author Jenny Louise Olson
Becky White
Helen Mitchell
Jennifer Halliday
Timothy Skinner
Deborah Schofield
Jennifer Sweeting
Natasha Watson
author_facet Jenny Louise Olson
Becky White
Helen Mitchell
Jennifer Halliday
Timothy Skinner
Deborah Schofield
Jennifer Sweeting
Natasha Watson
author_sort Jenny Louise Olson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The aim of this work was to develop a National Evaluation Framework to facilitate the standardization of delivery, quality, reporting, and evaluation of diabetes education and support programs delivered throughout Australia through the National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS). The NDSS is funded by the Australian Government, and provides access to diabetes information, education, support, and subsidized product across diverse settings in each state and territory of Australia through seven independent service-providers. This article reports the approach undertaken to develop the Framework. Methods A participatory approach was undertaken, focused on adopting nationally consistent outcomes and indicators, nominating objectives and measurement tools, specifying evaluation processes, and developing quality standards. Existing programs were classified based on related, overarching indicators enabling the adoption of a tiered system of evaluation. Results Two outcomes (i.e., improved clinical, reduced cost) and four indicators (i.e., improved knowledge and understanding, self-management, self-determination, psychosocial adjustment) were adopted from the Eigenmann and Colagiuri national consensus position statement for diabetes education. This allowed for the identification of objectives (i.e., improved empowerment, reduced distress, autonomy supportive program delivery, consumer satisfaction) and related measurement instruments. Programs were categorized as comprehensive, topic-specific, or basic education, with comprehensive programs allocated to receive the highest-level of evaluation. Eight quality standards were developed, with existing programs tested against those standards. Based on the results of testing, two comprehensive (OzDAFNE for people with type 1 diabetes, DESMOND for people with type 2 diabetes), and eight topic-specific (CarbSmart, ShopSmart, MonitorSmart, FootSmart, MedSmart, Living with Insulin, Insulin Pump Workshop, Ready Set Go – Let’s Move) structured diabetes self-management education and support programs were nominated for national delivery. Conclusions The National Evaluation Framework has facilitated consistency of program quality, delivery, and evaluation of programs delivered by multiple service providers across diverse contexts. The Framework could be applied by other service providers who facilitate multiple diabetes education and support programs and could be adapted for use in other chronic disease populations where education and support are indicated.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:32:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-33331de0663847628dea112fa0d15859
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:32:54Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-33331de0663847628dea112fa0d158592022-12-22T04:09:23ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-01-0122111110.1186/s12913-021-07374-4The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationallyJenny Louise Olson0Becky White1Helen Mitchell2Jennifer Halliday3Timothy Skinner4Deborah Schofield5Jennifer Sweeting6Natasha Watson7Diabetes WADiabetes WADiabetes WASchool of Psychology, Deakin UniversityThe Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes VictoriaDiabetes WADiabetes WADiabetes WAAbstract Background The aim of this work was to develop a National Evaluation Framework to facilitate the standardization of delivery, quality, reporting, and evaluation of diabetes education and support programs delivered throughout Australia through the National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS). The NDSS is funded by the Australian Government, and provides access to diabetes information, education, support, and subsidized product across diverse settings in each state and territory of Australia through seven independent service-providers. This article reports the approach undertaken to develop the Framework. Methods A participatory approach was undertaken, focused on adopting nationally consistent outcomes and indicators, nominating objectives and measurement tools, specifying evaluation processes, and developing quality standards. Existing programs were classified based on related, overarching indicators enabling the adoption of a tiered system of evaluation. Results Two outcomes (i.e., improved clinical, reduced cost) and four indicators (i.e., improved knowledge and understanding, self-management, self-determination, psychosocial adjustment) were adopted from the Eigenmann and Colagiuri national consensus position statement for diabetes education. This allowed for the identification of objectives (i.e., improved empowerment, reduced distress, autonomy supportive program delivery, consumer satisfaction) and related measurement instruments. Programs were categorized as comprehensive, topic-specific, or basic education, with comprehensive programs allocated to receive the highest-level of evaluation. Eight quality standards were developed, with existing programs tested against those standards. Based on the results of testing, two comprehensive (OzDAFNE for people with type 1 diabetes, DESMOND for people with type 2 diabetes), and eight topic-specific (CarbSmart, ShopSmart, MonitorSmart, FootSmart, MedSmart, Living with Insulin, Insulin Pump Workshop, Ready Set Go – Let’s Move) structured diabetes self-management education and support programs were nominated for national delivery. Conclusions The National Evaluation Framework has facilitated consistency of program quality, delivery, and evaluation of programs delivered by multiple service providers across diverse contexts. The Framework could be applied by other service providers who facilitate multiple diabetes education and support programs and could be adapted for use in other chronic disease populations where education and support are indicated.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07374-4Implementation scienceProgram evaluationDiabetes self-management education and supportHealth services researchSelf-managementChronic disease
spellingShingle Jenny Louise Olson
Becky White
Helen Mitchell
Jennifer Halliday
Timothy Skinner
Deborah Schofield
Jennifer Sweeting
Natasha Watson
The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally
BMC Health Services Research
Implementation science
Program evaluation
Diabetes self-management education and support
Health services research
Self-management
Chronic disease
title The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally
title_full The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally
title_fullStr The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally
title_full_unstemmed The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally
title_short The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally
title_sort design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self management education and support programs delivered nationally
topic Implementation science
Program evaluation
Diabetes self-management education and support
Health services research
Self-management
Chronic disease
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07374-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jennylouiseolson thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT beckywhite thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT helenmitchell thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT jenniferhalliday thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT timothyskinner thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT deborahschofield thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT jennifersweeting thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT natashawatson thedesignofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT jennylouiseolson designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT beckywhite designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT helenmitchell designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT jenniferhalliday designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT timothyskinner designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT deborahschofield designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT jennifersweeting designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally
AT natashawatson designofanevaluationframeworkfordiabetesselfmanagementeducationandsupportprogramsdeliverednationally