Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region

The human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) - secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) - produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the LHCGR. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul eGrzesik, Annika eKreuchwig, Claudia eRutz, Jens eFurkert, Burkhard eWiesner, Ralf eSchülein, Gunnar eKleinau, Joerg eGromoll, Gerd eKrause
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2015.00140/full
_version_ 1811234431123324928
author Paul eGrzesik
Annika eKreuchwig
Claudia eRutz
Jens eFurkert
Burkhard eWiesner
Ralf eSchülein
Gunnar eKleinau
Joerg eGromoll
Gerd eKrause
author_facet Paul eGrzesik
Annika eKreuchwig
Claudia eRutz
Jens eFurkert
Burkhard eWiesner
Ralf eSchülein
Gunnar eKleinau
Joerg eGromoll
Gerd eKrause
author_sort Paul eGrzesik
collection DOAJ
description The human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) - secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) - produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the LHCGR. This cannot be explained by binding to the receptor's leucine-rich repeat domain (LRRD), as this binding is similar for the two hormones. We therefore speculate that there are previously unknown differences in the hormone/receptor interaction at the extracellular hinge region, which might help to understand functional differences between the two hormones. We have therefore performed a detailed study of the binding and action of LH and CG at the LHCGR hinge region. We focused on a primate-specific additional exon in the hinge region, which is located between LRRD and the serpentine domain. The segment of the hinge region encoded by exon10 was previously reported to be only relevant to hLH signaling, as the exon10-deletion receptor exhibits decreased hLH signaling, but unchanged hCG signaling. We designed an advanced homology model of the hormone/LHCGR complex, followed by experimental characterization of relevant fragments in the hinge region. In addition, we examined predictions of a helical exon10-encoded conformation by block-wise polyalanine (helix supporting) mutations. These helix preserving modifications showed no effect on hormone induced signaling. However, introduction of a structure-disturbing double-proline mutant LHCGR-Q303P/E305P within the exon10-helix has, in contrast to exon10 deletion, no impact on hLH, but only on hCG signaling. This opposite effect on signaling by hLH and hCG can be explained by distinct sites of hormone interaction in the hinge region s. In conclusion, our analysis provides details of the differences between hLH- and hCG-induced signaling that are mainly determined in the L2-beta loop of the hormones and in the hinge region of the receptor
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:36:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3338222b162a4cf5b00dc7c50edb7ff0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:36:09Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-3338222b162a4cf5b00dc7c50edb7ff02022-12-22T03:34:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922015-09-01610.3389/fendo.2015.00140153392Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge regionPaul eGrzesik0Annika eKreuchwig1Claudia eRutz2Jens eFurkert3Burkhard eWiesner4Ralf eSchülein5Gunnar eKleinau6Joerg eGromoll7Gerd eKrause8Leibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyLeibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyLeibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyLeibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyLeibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyLeibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyCharite Universitätsmedizin, BerlinUniversity Hospital MuensterLeibniz Institut fuer molekuare Pharmakologie (FMP) Berlin, GermanyThe human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) - secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) - produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the LHCGR. This cannot be explained by binding to the receptor's leucine-rich repeat domain (LRRD), as this binding is similar for the two hormones. We therefore speculate that there are previously unknown differences in the hormone/receptor interaction at the extracellular hinge region, which might help to understand functional differences between the two hormones. We have therefore performed a detailed study of the binding and action of LH and CG at the LHCGR hinge region. We focused on a primate-specific additional exon in the hinge region, which is located between LRRD and the serpentine domain. The segment of the hinge region encoded by exon10 was previously reported to be only relevant to hLH signaling, as the exon10-deletion receptor exhibits decreased hLH signaling, but unchanged hCG signaling. We designed an advanced homology model of the hormone/LHCGR complex, followed by experimental characterization of relevant fragments in the hinge region. In addition, we examined predictions of a helical exon10-encoded conformation by block-wise polyalanine (helix supporting) mutations. These helix preserving modifications showed no effect on hormone induced signaling. However, introduction of a structure-disturbing double-proline mutant LHCGR-Q303P/E305P within the exon10-helix has, in contrast to exon10 deletion, no impact on hLH, but only on hCG signaling. This opposite effect on signaling by hLH and hCG can be explained by distinct sites of hormone interaction in the hinge region s. In conclusion, our analysis provides details of the differences between hLH- and hCG-induced signaling that are mainly determined in the L2-beta loop of the hormones and in the hinge region of the receptorhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2015.00140/fullGPCR ActivationchoriogonadotropinlutropinLutropin receptorGlycoprotein hormone receptors
spellingShingle Paul eGrzesik
Annika eKreuchwig
Claudia eRutz
Jens eFurkert
Burkhard eWiesner
Ralf eSchülein
Gunnar eKleinau
Joerg eGromoll
Gerd eKrause
Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region
Frontiers in Endocrinology
GPCR Activation
choriogonadotropin
lutropin
Lutropin receptor
Glycoprotein hormone receptors
title Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region
title_full Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region
title_fullStr Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region
title_full_unstemmed Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region
title_short Differences in signal activation by LH and hCG are mediated by the LH/CG receptor`s extracellular hinge region
title_sort differences in signal activation by lh and hcg are mediated by the lh cg receptor s extracellular hinge region
topic GPCR Activation
choriogonadotropin
lutropin
Lutropin receptor
Glycoprotein hormone receptors
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2015.00140/full
work_keys_str_mv AT paulegrzesik differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT annikaekreuchwig differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT claudiaerutz differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT jensefurkert differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT burkhardewiesner differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT ralfeschulein differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT gunnarekleinau differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT joergegromoll differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT gerdekrause differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion