An analytic method for separating local from regional effects on macroseismic intensity
nterpretation of macroseismic data is hazardous, due to its qualitative nature. This, linked with errors in eval- uation,) and the variations of local intensity, makes it difficult to draw valid conclusions. This study presents a statistical method as the basis for distinguishing the diverse compone...
Main Authors: | C. Gasparini, V. De Rubeis, P. Tosi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
1995-06-01
|
Series: | Annals of Geophysics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4132 |
Similar Items
-
Considerations on the assessment of macroseismic intensity
by: D. Molin
Published: (1995-06-01) -
Regional macroseismic field and intensity residuals of the August 24, 2016, Mw=6.0 central Italy earthquake
by: Valerio De Rubeis, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Local seismicity in Rome (Italy): recent results from macroseismic evidences
by: V. De Rubeis, et al.
Published: (1996-06-01) -
Northern Sicily, September 6, 2002earthquake: investigation on peculiarmacroseismic effects
by: V. De Rubeis, et al.
Published: (2003-06-01) -
The Emilia 2012 sequence: a macroseismic survey
by: Andrea Tertulliani, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01)