The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract Loss‐of‐function (LoF) mutations associated with disease do not manifest equally in different individuals. The impact of the genetic background on the consequences of LoF mutations remains poorly characterized. Here, we systematically assessed the changes in gene deletion phenotypes for 3,7...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Galardini, Bede P Busby, Cristina Vieitez, Alistair S Dunham, Athanasios Typas, Pedro Beltrao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2019-12-01
Series:Molecular Systems Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20198831
_version_ 1797283917212942336
author Marco Galardini
Bede P Busby
Cristina Vieitez
Alistair S Dunham
Athanasios Typas
Pedro Beltrao
author_facet Marco Galardini
Bede P Busby
Cristina Vieitez
Alistair S Dunham
Athanasios Typas
Pedro Beltrao
author_sort Marco Galardini
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Loss‐of‐function (LoF) mutations associated with disease do not manifest equally in different individuals. The impact of the genetic background on the consequences of LoF mutations remains poorly characterized. Here, we systematically assessed the changes in gene deletion phenotypes for 3,786 gene knockouts in four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and 38 conditions. We observed 18.5% of deletion phenotypes changing between pairs of strains on average with a small fraction conserved in all four strains. Conditions causing higher wild‐type growth differences and the deletion of pleiotropic genes showed above‐average changes in phenotypes. In addition, we performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) for growth under the same conditions for a panel of 925 yeast isolates. Gene–condition associations derived from GWAS were not enriched for genes with deletion phenotypes under the same conditions. However, cases where the results were congruent indicate the most likely mechanism underlying the GWAS signal. Overall, these results show a high degree of genetic background dependencies for LoF phenotypes.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:38:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3343ed5c76554252800c2d2617bd8b76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:38:47Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Molecular Systems Biology
spelling doaj.art-3343ed5c76554252800c2d2617bd8b762024-03-02T16:10:04ZengSpringer NatureMolecular Systems Biology1744-42922019-12-011512n/an/a10.15252/msb.20198831The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMarco Galardini0Bede P Busby1Cristina Vieitez2Alistair S Dunham3Athanasios Typas4Pedro Beltrao5European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge UKEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge UKEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge UKEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge UKEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Genome Biology Unit Heidelberg GermanyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge UKAbstract Loss‐of‐function (LoF) mutations associated with disease do not manifest equally in different individuals. The impact of the genetic background on the consequences of LoF mutations remains poorly characterized. Here, we systematically assessed the changes in gene deletion phenotypes for 3,786 gene knockouts in four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and 38 conditions. We observed 18.5% of deletion phenotypes changing between pairs of strains on average with a small fraction conserved in all four strains. Conditions causing higher wild‐type growth differences and the deletion of pleiotropic genes showed above‐average changes in phenotypes. In addition, we performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) for growth under the same conditions for a panel of 925 yeast isolates. Gene–condition associations derived from GWAS were not enriched for genes with deletion phenotypes under the same conditions. However, cases where the results were congruent indicate the most likely mechanism underlying the GWAS signal. Overall, these results show a high degree of genetic background dependencies for LoF phenotypes.https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20198831chemical genomicsgenetic backgroundLoF phenotypesSaccharomyces cerevisiae
spellingShingle Marco Galardini
Bede P Busby
Cristina Vieitez
Alistair S Dunham
Athanasios Typas
Pedro Beltrao
The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Molecular Systems Biology
chemical genomics
genetic background
LoF phenotypes
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_fullStr The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_short The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_sort impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in saccharomyces cerevisiae
topic chemical genomics
genetic background
LoF phenotypes
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
url https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20198831
work_keys_str_mv AT marcogalardini theimpactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT bedepbusby theimpactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT cristinavieitez theimpactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT alistairsdunham theimpactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT athanasiostypas theimpactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT pedrobeltrao theimpactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT marcogalardini impactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT bedepbusby impactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT cristinavieitez impactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT alistairsdunham impactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT athanasiostypas impactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT pedrobeltrao impactofthegeneticbackgroundongenedeletionphenotypesinsaccharomycescerevisiae