Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador

We assessed the social structure and behavior of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) competitive groups off Ecuador between July and August 2010. During this time we followed 185 whales in 22 competitive groups for 41.45 hr. The average group size was 8.4 animals (SD = 2.85). The average sightin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando Félix, Johana Novillo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Animal Behavior and Cognition 2015-02-01
Series:Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/5/05.Felix_Novillo_FINAL.pdf
_version_ 1818501924598579200
author Fernando Félix
Johana Novillo
author_facet Fernando Félix
Johana Novillo
author_sort Fernando Félix
collection DOAJ
description We assessed the social structure and behavior of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) competitive groups off Ecuador between July and August 2010. During this time we followed 185 whales in 22 competitive groups for 41.45 hr. The average group size was 8.4 animals (SD = 2.85). The average sighting time was 113.05 min/group (SD = 47.1). We used photographs of dorsal fins and video to record interactions and estimate an association index (AI) between each pair of whales within the groups. Sightings were divided into periods, which were defined by changes in group membership. On average, group composition changed every 30.2 min, which confirms that the structure of competitive groups is highly dynamic. Interactions between escorts characterized by low level of aggression. At least 60% of escorts joined or left together the group in small subunits between two and five animals, suggesting some type of cooperative association. Although singletons, as well as pairs or trios were able to join competitive groups at any moment, escorts that joined together were able to stay longer with the group and displace dominant escorts. Genetic analysis showed that in three occasions more than one female was present within a competitive group, suggesting either males are herding females or large competitive groups are formed by subunits. Males and females performed similar surface displays. We propose that competition and cooperation are interrelated in humpback whales’ competitive groups and that male cooperation would be an adaptive strategy either to displace dominant escorts or to fend off challengers.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:02:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3345f0f46b41460dbaad3a4dc55a2c40
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2372-5052
2372-4323
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:02:58Z
publishDate 2015-02-01
publisher Animal Behavior and Cognition
record_format Article
series Animal Behavior and Cognition
spelling doaj.art-3345f0f46b41460dbaad3a4dc55a2c402022-12-22T01:33:44ZengAnimal Behavior and CognitionAnimal Behavior and Cognition2372-50522372-43232015-02-0121567010.12966/abc.02.05.2015Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in EcuadorFernando FélixJohana NovilloWe assessed the social structure and behavior of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) competitive groups off Ecuador between July and August 2010. During this time we followed 185 whales in 22 competitive groups for 41.45 hr. The average group size was 8.4 animals (SD = 2.85). The average sighting time was 113.05 min/group (SD = 47.1). We used photographs of dorsal fins and video to record interactions and estimate an association index (AI) between each pair of whales within the groups. Sightings were divided into periods, which were defined by changes in group membership. On average, group composition changed every 30.2 min, which confirms that the structure of competitive groups is highly dynamic. Interactions between escorts characterized by low level of aggression. At least 60% of escorts joined or left together the group in small subunits between two and five animals, suggesting some type of cooperative association. Although singletons, as well as pairs or trios were able to join competitive groups at any moment, escorts that joined together were able to stay longer with the group and displace dominant escorts. Genetic analysis showed that in three occasions more than one female was present within a competitive group, suggesting either males are herding females or large competitive groups are formed by subunits. Males and females performed similar surface displays. We propose that competition and cooperation are interrelated in humpback whales’ competitive groups and that male cooperation would be an adaptive strategy either to displace dominant escorts or to fend off challengers.http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/5/05.Felix_Novillo_FINAL.pdfBehaviorCompetitive groupsCooperationHumpback whalesMegaptera novaeangliae
spellingShingle Fernando Félix
Johana Novillo
Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Behavior
Competitive groups
Cooperation
Humpback whales
Megaptera novaeangliae
title Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador
title_full Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador
title_fullStr Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador
title_short Structure and Dynamics of Humpback Whales Competitive Groups in Ecuador
title_sort structure and dynamics of humpback whales competitive groups in ecuador
topic Behavior
Competitive groups
Cooperation
Humpback whales
Megaptera novaeangliae
url http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/5/05.Felix_Novillo_FINAL.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandofelix structureanddynamicsofhumpbackwhalescompetitivegroupsinecuador
AT johananovillo structureanddynamicsofhumpbackwhalescompetitivegroupsinecuador