Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach

The electricity supply in South Africa is characterized by load-shedding. This study analyzed the determinants of the multidimensional energy poverty index (MEPI) in South Africa. The data, which were taken from the 2019–2021 General Household Survey (GHS), were analyzed using Tobit regression. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abayomi Samuel Oyekale, Thonaeng Charity Molelekoa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2089
_version_ 1827752747449974784
author Abayomi Samuel Oyekale
Thonaeng Charity Molelekoa
author_facet Abayomi Samuel Oyekale
Thonaeng Charity Molelekoa
author_sort Abayomi Samuel Oyekale
collection DOAJ
description The electricity supply in South Africa is characterized by load-shedding. This study analyzed the determinants of the multidimensional energy poverty index (MEPI) in South Africa. The data, which were taken from the 2019–2021 General Household Survey (GHS), were analyzed using Tobit regression. The results showed that between 2019 and 2021, the use of clean energy for cooking declined from 85.97% to 85.68%, respectively, whereas the use of clean energy for water heating declined from 87.24% in 2020 to 86.55% in 2021. Space heating with clean energy declined from 53.57% in 2019 to 50.35% in 2021. The average fuzzy MEPI was 0.143 and Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal provinces had the highest average values with 0.180 and 0.176, respectively. In the combined dataset, the Tobit regression results showed that, compared to Western Cape, the fuzzy MEPI significantly decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01) by −0.038, 0.028, 0.045, 0.023, 0.029, 0.038, 0.037, and 0.042 for residents in Eastern Cape, Northern Cape, Free State, Kwazulu-Natal, North West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga, and Limpopo provinces, respectively. In addition, the fuzzy MEPI for the Black, Coloured, Asian, and White respondents decreased by 0.042, 0.062, and 0.084, respectively. The fuzzy MEPI for male-headed households and the number of social grants increased, whereas the fuzzy MEPI significantly decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01) for the monthly salary and age of household heads. It was concluded that energy poverty in South Africa manifests through unclean energy utilization for space heating. The promotion of clean energy utilization should focus on deprived provinces, farms, and tribal areas.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:26:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3349446ad2684cfe9f7c29954c0728a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:26:19Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-3349446ad2684cfe9f7c29954c0728a82023-11-17T07:34:00ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-02-01165208910.3390/en16052089Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set ApproachAbayomi Samuel Oyekale0Thonaeng Charity Molelekoa1Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, North-West University Mafikeng Campus, Mmabatho 2735, South AfricaDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Extension, North-West University Mafikeng Campus, Mmabatho 2735, South AfricaThe electricity supply in South Africa is characterized by load-shedding. This study analyzed the determinants of the multidimensional energy poverty index (MEPI) in South Africa. The data, which were taken from the 2019–2021 General Household Survey (GHS), were analyzed using Tobit regression. The results showed that between 2019 and 2021, the use of clean energy for cooking declined from 85.97% to 85.68%, respectively, whereas the use of clean energy for water heating declined from 87.24% in 2020 to 86.55% in 2021. Space heating with clean energy declined from 53.57% in 2019 to 50.35% in 2021. The average fuzzy MEPI was 0.143 and Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal provinces had the highest average values with 0.180 and 0.176, respectively. In the combined dataset, the Tobit regression results showed that, compared to Western Cape, the fuzzy MEPI significantly decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01) by −0.038, 0.028, 0.045, 0.023, 0.029, 0.038, 0.037, and 0.042 for residents in Eastern Cape, Northern Cape, Free State, Kwazulu-Natal, North West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga, and Limpopo provinces, respectively. In addition, the fuzzy MEPI for the Black, Coloured, Asian, and White respondents decreased by 0.042, 0.062, and 0.084, respectively. The fuzzy MEPI for male-headed households and the number of social grants increased, whereas the fuzzy MEPI significantly decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01) for the monthly salary and age of household heads. It was concluded that energy poverty in South Africa manifests through unclean energy utilization for space heating. The promotion of clean energy utilization should focus on deprived provinces, farms, and tribal areas.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2089clean energypovertymultidimensional energy poverty indexMEPIfuzzy setSouth Africa
spellingShingle Abayomi Samuel Oyekale
Thonaeng Charity Molelekoa
Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach
Energies
clean energy
poverty
multidimensional energy poverty index
MEPI
fuzzy set
South Africa
title Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach
title_full Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach
title_fullStr Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach
title_short Multidimensional Indicator of Energy Poverty in South Africa Using the Fuzzy Set Approach
title_sort multidimensional indicator of energy poverty in south africa using the fuzzy set approach
topic clean energy
poverty
multidimensional energy poverty index
MEPI
fuzzy set
South Africa
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2089
work_keys_str_mv AT abayomisamueloyekale multidimensionalindicatorofenergypovertyinsouthafricausingthefuzzysetapproach
AT thonaengcharitymolelekoa multidimensionalindicatorofenergypovertyinsouthafricausingthefuzzysetapproach