Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples

Developed and validated analytical methods for the determination of a wide spectrum of pesticide residues in honey and honeybee samples after the modification of QuEChERS extraction in combination with gas chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatogra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Żaneta Bargańska, Piotr Konieczka, Jacek Namieśnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/23/10/2582
_version_ 1818243796254588928
author Żaneta Bargańska
Piotr Konieczka
Jacek Namieśnik
author_facet Żaneta Bargańska
Piotr Konieczka
Jacek Namieśnik
author_sort Żaneta Bargańska
collection DOAJ
description Developed and validated analytical methods for the determination of a wide spectrum of pesticide residues in honey and honeybee samples after the modification of QuEChERS extraction in combination with gas chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were discussed and compared. The developed methods were evaluated regarding the utilized equipment and reagents using Eco-Scale and compared in terms of extraction time, accuracy, precision, sensitivity and versatility, with similar procedures. The results proved that the QuEChERS protocol in combination with LC and GC techniques fulfills the requirements of green analytical chemistry, so it can be used as a tool in environmental monitoring. The recovery was 85–116% for honey and 85.5–103.5% for honeybee samples. The developed methods were successfully applied in monitoring real samples collected from three districts of Pomerania in Poland. Analysis of real samples revealed the presence of the following pesticides: bifenthrin, fenpyroximate, methidathione, spinosad, thiamethoxam, triazophos, metconazole and cypermethrin at levels higher than the MRLs established by the EU.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T14:06:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3352febebe3e4988a3544dac1d77dd10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T14:06:49Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-3352febebe3e4988a3544dac1d77dd102022-12-22T00:22:11ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492018-10-012310258210.3390/molecules23102582molecules23102582Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee SamplesŻaneta Bargańska0Piotr Konieczka1Jacek Namieśnik2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology (GUT), Narutowicza 11/12 street, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology (GUT), Narutowicza 11/12 street, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology (GUT), Narutowicza 11/12 street, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandDeveloped and validated analytical methods for the determination of a wide spectrum of pesticide residues in honey and honeybee samples after the modification of QuEChERS extraction in combination with gas chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were discussed and compared. The developed methods were evaluated regarding the utilized equipment and reagents using Eco-Scale and compared in terms of extraction time, accuracy, precision, sensitivity and versatility, with similar procedures. The results proved that the QuEChERS protocol in combination with LC and GC techniques fulfills the requirements of green analytical chemistry, so it can be used as a tool in environmental monitoring. The recovery was 85–116% for honey and 85.5–103.5% for honeybee samples. The developed methods were successfully applied in monitoring real samples collected from three districts of Pomerania in Poland. Analysis of real samples revealed the presence of the following pesticides: bifenthrin, fenpyroximate, methidathione, spinosad, thiamethoxam, triazophos, metconazole and cypermethrin at levels higher than the MRLs established by the EU.http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/23/10/2582honeyhoneybeespesticidesLC-MS/MSGC-MS/MSQuEChERSenvironmental monitoringEco-Scale
spellingShingle Żaneta Bargańska
Piotr Konieczka
Jacek Namieśnik
Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
Molecules
honey
honeybees
pesticides
LC-MS/MS
GC-MS/MS
QuEChERS
environmental monitoring
Eco-Scale
title Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
title_full Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
title_short Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples
title_sort comparison of two methods for the determination of selected pesticides in honey and honeybee samples
topic honey
honeybees
pesticides
LC-MS/MS
GC-MS/MS
QuEChERS
environmental monitoring
Eco-Scale
url http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/23/10/2582
work_keys_str_mv AT zanetabarganska comparisonoftwomethodsforthedeterminationofselectedpesticidesinhoneyandhoneybeesamples
AT piotrkonieczka comparisonoftwomethodsforthedeterminationofselectedpesticidesinhoneyandhoneybeesamples
AT jaceknamiesnik comparisonoftwomethodsforthedeterminationofselectedpesticidesinhoneyandhoneybeesamples