Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)

ObjectiveTiming for sexual intercourse is important in achieving pregnancy in natural menstrual cycles. Different methods of detecting the fertile window have been invented, among them luteinization hormone (LH) to predict ovulation and biphasic body basal temperature (BBT) to confirm ovulation retr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregor Weiss, Karl Strohmayer, Werner Koele, Nina Reinschissler, Michael Schenk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Digital Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2022.930010/full
_version_ 1798028732238135296
author Gregor Weiss
Karl Strohmayer
Werner Koele
Nina Reinschissler
Michael Schenk
Michael Schenk
author_facet Gregor Weiss
Karl Strohmayer
Werner Koele
Nina Reinschissler
Michael Schenk
Michael Schenk
author_sort Gregor Weiss
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTiming for sexual intercourse is important in achieving pregnancy in natural menstrual cycles. Different methods of detecting the fertile window have been invented, among them luteinization hormone (LH) to predict ovulation and biphasic body basal temperature (BBT) to confirm ovulation retrospectively. The gold standard to detect ovulation in gynecology practice remains transvaginal ultrasonography in combination with serum progesterone. In this study we evaluated a wearable temperature sensing patch (femSense®) using continuous body temperature measurement to confirm ovulation and determine the end of the fertile window.Methods96 participants received the femSense® system consisting of an adhesive axillary thermometer patch and a smartphone application, where patients were asked to document information about their previous 3 cycles. Based on the participants data, the app predicted the cycle length and the estimated day of ovulation. From these predictions, the most probable fertile window and the day for applying the patch were derived. Participants applied and activated the femSense® patch on the calculated date, from which the patch continuously recorded their body temperature throughout a period of up to 7 days to confirm ovulation. Patients documented their daily urinary LH test positivity, and a transvaginal ultrasound was performed on day cycle day 7, 10, 12 and 14/15 to investigate the growth of one dominant follicle. If a follicle reached 15 mm in diameter, an ultrasound examination was carried out every day consecutively until ovulation. On the day ovulation was detected, serum progesterone was measured to confirm the results of the ultrasound. The performance of femSense® was evaluated by comparing the day of ovulation confirmation with the results of ovulation prediction (LH test) and detection (transvaginal ultrasound).ResultsThe femSense® system confirmed ovulation occurrence in 60 cases (81.1%) compared to 48 predicted cases (64.9%) with the LH test (p = 0.041). Subgroup analysis revealed a positive trend for the femSense® system of specific ovulation confirmation within the fertile window of 24 h after ovulation in 42 of 74 cases (56.8%). Cycle length, therapy method or infertility reason of the patient did not influence accuracy of the femSense® system.ConclusionsThe femSense® system poses a promising alternative to the traditional BBT method and is a valuable surrogate marker to transvaginal ultrasound for confirmation of ovulation.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:14:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-335511ef97e94759922ca20f95c00d70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-253X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:14:09Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Digital Health
spelling doaj.art-335511ef97e94759922ca20f95c00d702022-12-22T04:07:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Digital Health2673-253X2022-09-01410.3389/fdgth.2022.930010930010Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)Gregor Weiss0Karl Strohmayer1Werner Koele2Nina Reinschissler3Michael Schenk4Michael Schenk5Das Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Dobl, AustriaSteadySense GmbH, Seiersberg, AustriaSteadySense GmbH, Seiersberg, AustriaDas Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Dobl, AustriaDas Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Dobl, AustriaMedical University of Graz, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graz, AustriaObjectiveTiming for sexual intercourse is important in achieving pregnancy in natural menstrual cycles. Different methods of detecting the fertile window have been invented, among them luteinization hormone (LH) to predict ovulation and biphasic body basal temperature (BBT) to confirm ovulation retrospectively. The gold standard to detect ovulation in gynecology practice remains transvaginal ultrasonography in combination with serum progesterone. In this study we evaluated a wearable temperature sensing patch (femSense®) using continuous body temperature measurement to confirm ovulation and determine the end of the fertile window.Methods96 participants received the femSense® system consisting of an adhesive axillary thermometer patch and a smartphone application, where patients were asked to document information about their previous 3 cycles. Based on the participants data, the app predicted the cycle length and the estimated day of ovulation. From these predictions, the most probable fertile window and the day for applying the patch were derived. Participants applied and activated the femSense® patch on the calculated date, from which the patch continuously recorded their body temperature throughout a period of up to 7 days to confirm ovulation. Patients documented their daily urinary LH test positivity, and a transvaginal ultrasound was performed on day cycle day 7, 10, 12 and 14/15 to investigate the growth of one dominant follicle. If a follicle reached 15 mm in diameter, an ultrasound examination was carried out every day consecutively until ovulation. On the day ovulation was detected, serum progesterone was measured to confirm the results of the ultrasound. The performance of femSense® was evaluated by comparing the day of ovulation confirmation with the results of ovulation prediction (LH test) and detection (transvaginal ultrasound).ResultsThe femSense® system confirmed ovulation occurrence in 60 cases (81.1%) compared to 48 predicted cases (64.9%) with the LH test (p = 0.041). Subgroup analysis revealed a positive trend for the femSense® system of specific ovulation confirmation within the fertile window of 24 h after ovulation in 42 of 74 cases (56.8%). Cycle length, therapy method or infertility reason of the patient did not influence accuracy of the femSense® system.ConclusionsThe femSense® system poses a promising alternative to the traditional BBT method and is a valuable surrogate marker to transvaginal ultrasound for confirmation of ovulation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2022.930010/fullovulationfertile windowbasal temperaturefemSensereproduction
spellingShingle Gregor Weiss
Karl Strohmayer
Werner Koele
Nina Reinschissler
Michael Schenk
Michael Schenk
Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)
Frontiers in Digital Health
ovulation
fertile window
basal temperature
femSense
reproduction
title Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)
title_full Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)
title_fullStr Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)
title_full_unstemmed Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)
title_short Confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer (femSense®)
title_sort confirmation of human ovulation in assisted reproduction using an adhesive axillary thermometer femsense r
topic ovulation
fertile window
basal temperature
femSense
reproduction
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2022.930010/full
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorweiss confirmationofhumanovulationinassistedreproductionusinganadhesiveaxillarythermometerfemsense
AT karlstrohmayer confirmationofhumanovulationinassistedreproductionusinganadhesiveaxillarythermometerfemsense
AT wernerkoele confirmationofhumanovulationinassistedreproductionusinganadhesiveaxillarythermometerfemsense
AT ninareinschissler confirmationofhumanovulationinassistedreproductionusinganadhesiveaxillarythermometerfemsense
AT michaelschenk confirmationofhumanovulationinassistedreproductionusinganadhesiveaxillarythermometerfemsense
AT michaelschenk confirmationofhumanovulationinassistedreproductionusinganadhesiveaxillarythermometerfemsense