Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects

SUMMARY: Reducing the particle size (PS) of feed ingredients is necessary and requires substantial energy expenditure. A majority of research on ingredient PS has considered the effects of corn and wheat PS on poultry performance. However, there is limited research investigating the effects of soybe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.M. Lyons, P.H. Patterson, J.W. Boney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:Journal of Applied Poultry Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617122000265
_version_ 1798038833127751680
author A.M. Lyons
P.H. Patterson
J.W. Boney
author_facet A.M. Lyons
P.H. Patterson
J.W. Boney
author_sort A.M. Lyons
collection DOAJ
description SUMMARY: Reducing the particle size (PS) of feed ingredients is necessary and requires substantial energy expenditure. A majority of research on ingredient PS has considered the effects of corn and wheat PS on poultry performance. However, there is limited research investigating the effects of soybean meal (SBM) PS. Two experiments were conducted using expeller extruded SBM to measure the energy required to reduce soybean meal cake PS at the processor (experiment 1) and to determine the effects of various SBM PS on pullet performance from 0 to 17 weeks of age (experiment 2). The PS of SBM used in the current study was reduced using a hammermill fitted with one of three screens (2.4 mm, 5.6 mm, 7.9 mm) which represent the three treatments used in experiments 1 and 2. In experiment 1, hammermill screen size influenced motor load and power usage of the hammermill motor. The 2.4 mm screen required more energy and power to reduce the PS of SBM cake compared to all other screen sizes (P < 0.001). Experiment 2 used three identical diets that varied only in SBM PS. Overall, mash diets varying in SBM PS did not influence the measured pullet performance parameters which included FI, BWG, and FCR (P > 0.05). These data indicate that SBM may be manufactured using larger screen sizes to reduce energy usage at soybean processing facilities with no impact on ready-to-lay pullet development.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:45:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3358304da8364f71beb4fdfc31676c28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1056-6171
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:45:45Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Poultry Research
spelling doaj.art-3358304da8364f71beb4fdfc31676c282022-12-22T04:01:25ZengElsevierJournal of Applied Poultry Research1056-61712022-09-01313100262Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effectsA.M. Lyons0P.H. Patterson1J.W. Boney2Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USADepartment of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USACorresponding author:; Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USASUMMARY: Reducing the particle size (PS) of feed ingredients is necessary and requires substantial energy expenditure. A majority of research on ingredient PS has considered the effects of corn and wheat PS on poultry performance. However, there is limited research investigating the effects of soybean meal (SBM) PS. Two experiments were conducted using expeller extruded SBM to measure the energy required to reduce soybean meal cake PS at the processor (experiment 1) and to determine the effects of various SBM PS on pullet performance from 0 to 17 weeks of age (experiment 2). The PS of SBM used in the current study was reduced using a hammermill fitted with one of three screens (2.4 mm, 5.6 mm, 7.9 mm) which represent the three treatments used in experiments 1 and 2. In experiment 1, hammermill screen size influenced motor load and power usage of the hammermill motor. The 2.4 mm screen required more energy and power to reduce the PS of SBM cake compared to all other screen sizes (P < 0.001). Experiment 2 used three identical diets that varied only in SBM PS. Overall, mash diets varying in SBM PS did not influence the measured pullet performance parameters which included FI, BWG, and FCR (P > 0.05). These data indicate that SBM may be manufactured using larger screen sizes to reduce energy usage at soybean processing facilities with no impact on ready-to-lay pullet development.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617122000265expeller-extrusionhammermillmashenergy usagescreen size
spellingShingle A.M. Lyons
P.H. Patterson
J.W. Boney
Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
Journal of Applied Poultry Research
expeller-extrusion
hammermill
mash
energy usage
screen size
title Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
title_full Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
title_fullStr Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
title_full_unstemmed Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
title_short Hammermill screen selection for soybean processing: soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
title_sort hammermill screen selection for soybean processing soybean meal particle size and pullet performance effects
topic expeller-extrusion
hammermill
mash
energy usage
screen size
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617122000265
work_keys_str_mv AT amlyons hammermillscreenselectionforsoybeanprocessingsoybeanmealparticlesizeandpulletperformanceeffects
AT phpatterson hammermillscreenselectionforsoybeanprocessingsoybeanmealparticlesizeandpulletperformanceeffects
AT jwboney hammermillscreenselectionforsoybeanprocessingsoybeanmealparticlesizeandpulletperformanceeffects