Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology

Archaeological landscapes can be obscured by environmental factors, rendering conventional visual interpretation of optical data problematic. The absence of evidence can lead to seemingly empty locations and isolated monuments. This, in turn, influences the cultural–historical interpretation of arch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jegor K. Blochin, Elena A. Pavlovskaia, Timur R. Sadykov, Gino Caspari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/20/4992
_version_ 1827719924380860416
author Jegor K. Blochin
Elena A. Pavlovskaia
Timur R. Sadykov
Gino Caspari
author_facet Jegor K. Blochin
Elena A. Pavlovskaia
Timur R. Sadykov
Gino Caspari
author_sort Jegor K. Blochin
collection DOAJ
description Archaeological landscapes can be obscured by environmental factors, rendering conventional visual interpretation of optical data problematic. The absence of evidence can lead to seemingly empty locations and isolated monuments. This, in turn, influences the cultural–historical interpretation of archaeological sites. Here, we assess the potential of integrating thermal and magnetic remote sensing methods in the detection and mapping of buried archaeological structures. The area of interest in an alluvial plain in Tuva Republic makes the application of standard methods like optical remote sensing and field walking impractical, as natural vegetation features effectively hide anthropogenic structures. We combined drone-based aerial thermography and airborne and ground-based magnetometry to establish an approach to reliably identifying stone structures concealed within alluvial soils. The data integration led to the discovery of nine buried archaeological structures in proximity to an Early Iron Age royal tomb, shedding light on ritual land use continuity patterns.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:55:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3361c5426e2b4eb488ac91484da439e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:55:26Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-3361c5426e2b4eb488ac91484da439e92023-11-19T17:59:17ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-10-011520499210.3390/rs15204992Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape ArchaeologyJegor K. Blochin0Elena A. Pavlovskaia1Timur R. Sadykov2Gino Caspari3Institute for the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, Dvortsovaya Nabereznaya 18, 191186 St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Nabereznaya 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute for the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, Dvortsovaya Nabereznaya 18, 191186 St. Petersburg, RussiaDepartment of Archaeology, University of Sydney, The Quadrangle A14, Sydney 2006, AustraliaArchaeological landscapes can be obscured by environmental factors, rendering conventional visual interpretation of optical data problematic. The absence of evidence can lead to seemingly empty locations and isolated monuments. This, in turn, influences the cultural–historical interpretation of archaeological sites. Here, we assess the potential of integrating thermal and magnetic remote sensing methods in the detection and mapping of buried archaeological structures. The area of interest in an alluvial plain in Tuva Republic makes the application of standard methods like optical remote sensing and field walking impractical, as natural vegetation features effectively hide anthropogenic structures. We combined drone-based aerial thermography and airborne and ground-based magnetometry to establish an approach to reliably identifying stone structures concealed within alluvial soils. The data integration led to the discovery of nine buried archaeological structures in proximity to an Early Iron Age royal tomb, shedding light on ritual land use continuity patterns.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/20/4992aerial magnetometryaerial thermographyarchaeological geophysicsScythianEarly Iron AgeSiberia
spellingShingle Jegor K. Blochin
Elena A. Pavlovskaia
Timur R. Sadykov
Gino Caspari
Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology
Remote Sensing
aerial magnetometry
aerial thermography
archaeological geophysics
Scythian
Early Iron Age
Siberia
title Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology
title_full Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology
title_fullStr Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology
title_full_unstemmed Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology
title_short Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology
title_sort remotely sensing the invisible thermal and magnetic survey data integration for landscape archaeology
topic aerial magnetometry
aerial thermography
archaeological geophysics
Scythian
Early Iron Age
Siberia
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/20/4992
work_keys_str_mv AT jegorkblochin remotelysensingtheinvisiblethermalandmagneticsurveydataintegrationforlandscapearchaeology
AT elenaapavlovskaia remotelysensingtheinvisiblethermalandmagneticsurveydataintegrationforlandscapearchaeology
AT timurrsadykov remotelysensingtheinvisiblethermalandmagneticsurveydataintegrationforlandscapearchaeology
AT ginocaspari remotelysensingtheinvisiblethermalandmagneticsurveydataintegrationforlandscapearchaeology