Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma

A cohort of individuals (n = 136) with lesions as severe as atrophic chronic gastritis (ACG) was cross-sectionally evaluated for the validity assessment of pepsinogen I (PGI) and pepsinogen II (PGII) serum levels for the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and gastric dysplasia. PGI/PGII ratio [...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Altamiro da Costa-Pereira, Carlos Lopes, Joana Barbosa, Mateus Guilherme, Luís Moreira-Dias, Helena Lomba-Viana, Rui Silva, Nuno Abreu, Rafael Lomba-Viana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2004-09-01
Series:Neoplasia: An International Journal for Oncology Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476558604800228
_version_ 1819200154447642624
author Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Altamiro da Costa-Pereira
Carlos Lopes
Joana Barbosa
Mateus Guilherme
Luís Moreira-Dias
Helena Lomba-Viana
Rui Silva
Nuno Abreu
Rafael Lomba-Viana
author_facet Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Altamiro da Costa-Pereira
Carlos Lopes
Joana Barbosa
Mateus Guilherme
Luís Moreira-Dias
Helena Lomba-Viana
Rui Silva
Nuno Abreu
Rafael Lomba-Viana
author_sort Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
collection DOAJ
description A cohort of individuals (n = 136) with lesions as severe as atrophic chronic gastritis (ACG) was cross-sectionally evaluated for the validity assessment of pepsinogen I (PGI) and pepsinogen II (PGII) serum levels for the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and gastric dysplasia. PGI/PGII ratio [median (range)] was 4 (0.57.5) in patients with ACG (n = 35); 4.6 (1.9-6.8) in type I IM (n = 18); 4.2 (1.4-5.9) in type II or type III IM limited to the antrum and incisura (n = 20); 2.4 (0.4-5.6) in extensive incomplete IM (n = 38); and 1.3 (0.4-6.4) in low-grade dysplasia (n = 23) (P = .002). Using histopathologic data as a reference test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (CI 95%) was 0.73 (0.64-0.82) for extensive IM, 0.72 (0.58-0.85) for the diagnosis of dysplasia, and 0.81 (0.66-0.95) for the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia. Using a PGI/PGII ratio of ≤3 as the cutoff for dysplasia diagnosis, the sensitivity was 70% (62-78%), the specificity was 65% (57-73%), and the negative predictive value estimates were over 90%. No differences in PG levels according to age or gender were observed. Helicobacter pylori did not significantly influence validity measurement estimates. PGI/PGII serum level ratio can be used even in the management of patients with a high a priori probability for a positive test. It may be useful for the exclusion of more advanced lesions (extensive IM and neoplastic lesions).
first_indexed 2024-12-23T03:27:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3374398ce6924dad8a65327efc5480fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-5586
1522-8002
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T03:27:43Z
publishDate 2004-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Neoplasia: An International Journal for Oncology Research
spelling doaj.art-3374398ce6924dad8a65327efc5480fb2022-12-21T18:01:47ZengElsevierNeoplasia: An International Journal for Oncology Research1476-55861522-80022004-09-016544945610.1593/neo.03505Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric AdenocarcinomaMário Dinis-Ribeiro0Altamiro da Costa-Pereira1Carlos Lopes2Joana Barbosa3Mateus Guilherme4Luís Moreira-Dias5Helena Lomba-Viana6Rui Silva7Nuno Abreu8Rafael Lomba-Viana9Department of Gastroenterology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalPorto Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Pathology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Pathology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Pathology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oncology Portuguese Institute, Oporto, PortugalA cohort of individuals (n = 136) with lesions as severe as atrophic chronic gastritis (ACG) was cross-sectionally evaluated for the validity assessment of pepsinogen I (PGI) and pepsinogen II (PGII) serum levels for the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and gastric dysplasia. PGI/PGII ratio [median (range)] was 4 (0.57.5) in patients with ACG (n = 35); 4.6 (1.9-6.8) in type I IM (n = 18); 4.2 (1.4-5.9) in type II or type III IM limited to the antrum and incisura (n = 20); 2.4 (0.4-5.6) in extensive incomplete IM (n = 38); and 1.3 (0.4-6.4) in low-grade dysplasia (n = 23) (P = .002). Using histopathologic data as a reference test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (CI 95%) was 0.73 (0.64-0.82) for extensive IM, 0.72 (0.58-0.85) for the diagnosis of dysplasia, and 0.81 (0.66-0.95) for the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia. Using a PGI/PGII ratio of ≤3 as the cutoff for dysplasia diagnosis, the sensitivity was 70% (62-78%), the specificity was 65% (57-73%), and the negative predictive value estimates were over 90%. No differences in PG levels according to age or gender were observed. Helicobacter pylori did not significantly influence validity measurement estimates. PGI/PGII serum level ratio can be used even in the management of patients with a high a priori probability for a positive test. It may be useful for the exclusion of more advanced lesions (extensive IM and neoplastic lesions).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476558604800228Pepsinogensstomach neoplasmsreceiver operating characteristic curvedisease managementprecancerous conditions
spellingShingle Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Altamiro da Costa-Pereira
Carlos Lopes
Joana Barbosa
Mateus Guilherme
Luís Moreira-Dias
Helena Lomba-Viana
Rui Silva
Nuno Abreu
Rafael Lomba-Viana
Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Neoplasia: An International Journal for Oncology Research
Pepsinogens
stomach neoplasms
receiver operating characteristic curve
disease management
precancerous conditions
title Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma
title_full Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma
title_short Validity of Serum Pepsinogen I/II Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Intestinal Metaplasia during the Follow-Up of Patients at Risk for Intestinal-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma
title_sort validity of serum pepsinogen i ii ratio for the diagnosis of gastric epithelial dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia during the follow up of patients at risk for intestinal type gastric adenocarcinoma
topic Pepsinogens
stomach neoplasms
receiver operating characteristic curve
disease management
precancerous conditions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476558604800228
work_keys_str_mv AT mariodinisribeiro validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT altamirodacostapereira validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT carloslopes validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT joanabarbosa validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT mateusguilherme validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT luismoreiradias validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT helenalombaviana validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT ruisilva validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT nunoabreu validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma
AT rafaellombaviana validityofserumpepsinogeniiiratioforthediagnosisofgastricepithelialdysplasiaandintestinalmetaplasiaduringthefollowupofpatientsatriskforintestinaltypegastricadenocarcinoma