Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery

Abstract Background Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) affects 15% of patients at initial colorectal cancer diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible option, however there is limited data describing its efficac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mina Sarofim, Ruwanthi Wijayawardana, Nima Ahmadi, Shoma Barat, Winston Liauw, David L Morris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-04-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03392-8
_version_ 1827277081925386240
author Mina Sarofim
Ruwanthi Wijayawardana
Nima Ahmadi
Shoma Barat
Winston Liauw
David L Morris
author_facet Mina Sarofim
Ruwanthi Wijayawardana
Nima Ahmadi
Shoma Barat
Winston Liauw
David L Morris
author_sort Mina Sarofim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) affects 15% of patients at initial colorectal cancer diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible option, however there is limited data describing its efficacy in advanced peritoneal disease. This study evaluated the effect of NAC on survival in patients with high volume CRPM undergoing CRS with or without HIPEC. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM from 2004 to 2019 at our institution was performed. The cohort was divided based on peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) at surgery: Low Volume (PCI ≤ 16) and High Volume (PCI > 16). Results A total of 326 patients underwent CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. There were 39 patients (12%) with High Volume disease, and 15 of these (38%) received NAC. Patients with High Volume disease had significantly longer operating time, lower likelihood of complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-0 score), longer intensive care unit length of stay and longer hospital stay compared to Low Volume disease. In High Volume disease, the NAC group had a significantly shorter median survival of 14.4 months compared to 23.8 months in the non-NAC group (p = 0.046). Conclusion Patients with High Volume CRPM achieved good median survival following CRS with HIPEC, which challenges the current PCI threshold for offering CRS. The use of NAC in this cohort did not increase perioperative morbidity but was associated with significantly shorter median survival compared to upfront surgery.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:14:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-337d8129953946d6b9400432b954cf21
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:14:55Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-337d8129953946d6b9400432b954cf212024-04-21T11:20:53ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192024-04-012211710.1186/s12957-024-03392-8Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgeryMina Sarofim0Ruwanthi Wijayawardana1Nima Ahmadi2Shoma Barat3Winston Liauw4David L Morris5Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George HospitalLiver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George HospitalLiver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George HospitalLiver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George HospitalSchool of Medicine, University of New South WalesLiver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George HospitalAbstract Background Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) affects 15% of patients at initial colorectal cancer diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible option, however there is limited data describing its efficacy in advanced peritoneal disease. This study evaluated the effect of NAC on survival in patients with high volume CRPM undergoing CRS with or without HIPEC. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM from 2004 to 2019 at our institution was performed. The cohort was divided based on peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) at surgery: Low Volume (PCI ≤ 16) and High Volume (PCI > 16). Results A total of 326 patients underwent CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. There were 39 patients (12%) with High Volume disease, and 15 of these (38%) received NAC. Patients with High Volume disease had significantly longer operating time, lower likelihood of complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-0 score), longer intensive care unit length of stay and longer hospital stay compared to Low Volume disease. In High Volume disease, the NAC group had a significantly shorter median survival of 14.4 months compared to 23.8 months in the non-NAC group (p = 0.046). Conclusion Patients with High Volume CRPM achieved good median survival following CRS with HIPEC, which challenges the current PCI threshold for offering CRS. The use of NAC in this cohort did not increase perioperative morbidity but was associated with significantly shorter median survival compared to upfront surgery.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03392-8Colorectal cancerPeritoneal metastasesCytoreductive surgeryNeoadjuvant chemotherapyHIPEC
spellingShingle Mina Sarofim
Ruwanthi Wijayawardana
Nima Ahmadi
Shoma Barat
Winston Liauw
David L Morris
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Colorectal cancer
Peritoneal metastases
Cytoreductive surgery
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
HIPEC
title Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
title_full Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
title_short Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
title_sort neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery
topic Colorectal cancer
Peritoneal metastases
Cytoreductive surgery
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
HIPEC
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03392-8
work_keys_str_mv AT minasarofim neoadjuvantchemotherapydoesnotimprovesurvivalforpatientswithhighvolumecolorectalperitonealmetastasesundergoingcytoreductivesurgery
AT ruwanthiwijayawardana neoadjuvantchemotherapydoesnotimprovesurvivalforpatientswithhighvolumecolorectalperitonealmetastasesundergoingcytoreductivesurgery
AT nimaahmadi neoadjuvantchemotherapydoesnotimprovesurvivalforpatientswithhighvolumecolorectalperitonealmetastasesundergoingcytoreductivesurgery
AT shomabarat neoadjuvantchemotherapydoesnotimprovesurvivalforpatientswithhighvolumecolorectalperitonealmetastasesundergoingcytoreductivesurgery
AT winstonliauw neoadjuvantchemotherapydoesnotimprovesurvivalforpatientswithhighvolumecolorectalperitonealmetastasesundergoingcytoreductivesurgery
AT davidlmorris neoadjuvantchemotherapydoesnotimprovesurvivalforpatientswithhighvolumecolorectalperitonealmetastasesundergoingcytoreductivesurgery