Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus observation in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Methods: In a retrospective comparative study, records of 45 patients with CSCR were reviewed. Twenty-two patients received IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) while 23...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cihan Ünlü, Gurkan Erdogan, Tugba Aydogan, Betul Ilkay Sezgin Akcay, Esra Kardes, Gulunay Akcali Kiray, Tahir Kansu Bozkurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Knowledge E 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2016;volume=11;issue=1;spage=61;epage=65;aulast=Ünlü
_version_ 1811323992000167936
author Cihan Ünlü
Gurkan Erdogan
Tugba Aydogan
Betul Ilkay Sezgin Akcay
Esra Kardes
Gulunay Akcali Kiray
Tahir Kansu Bozkurt
author_facet Cihan Ünlü
Gurkan Erdogan
Tugba Aydogan
Betul Ilkay Sezgin Akcay
Esra Kardes
Gulunay Akcali Kiray
Tahir Kansu Bozkurt
author_sort Cihan Ünlü
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare the outcomes of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus observation in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Methods: In a retrospective comparative study, records of 45 patients with CSCR were reviewed. Twenty-two patients received IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) while 23 subjects were observed. All subjects underwent measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP), dilated fundus examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at baseline and follow up visits. Outcome measures included central macular thickness (CMT) and BCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notations. Results: Mean age was 44.1 ± 9.3 (range: 24 to 64) years and mean follow-up period was 10.4 ± 11.2 (range: 3 to 43; median: 6) months. All patients demonstrated resolution of neurosensory detachment and improvement in visual acuity. At final visit, there was no significant difference in mean CMT between the IVB and observation groups (275 vs 284 μm, P> 0.05). Mean baseline logMAR visual acuity was 0.38 ± 0.24 in the IVB group which improved to 0.24 ± 0.31 at final follow-up (P = 0.011); mean baseline logMAR visual acuity was 0.42 ± 0.28 in the observation group and improved to 0.12 ± 0.18 (P = 0.001). Visual improvement was more marked in the observation group (0.30 vs 0.14 logMAR, P< 0.05) and mean final visual acuity was also significantly better (P = 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between IVB injection and observation in terms of anatomical outcomes of treatment for CSCR. In terms of visual outcomes, observation was superior to IVB injection.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:05:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-338718cb1fe7466b959d3e48d20811e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-322X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:05:16Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Knowledge E
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
spelling doaj.art-338718cb1fe7466b959d3e48d20811e62022-12-22T02:43:55ZengKnowledge EJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research2008-322X2016-01-01111616510.4103/2008-322X.180700Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathyCihan ÜnlüGurkan ErdoganTugba AydoganBetul Ilkay Sezgin AkcayEsra KardesGulunay Akcali KirayTahir Kansu BozkurtPurpose: To compare the outcomes of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus observation in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Methods: In a retrospective comparative study, records of 45 patients with CSCR were reviewed. Twenty-two patients received IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) while 23 subjects were observed. All subjects underwent measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP), dilated fundus examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at baseline and follow up visits. Outcome measures included central macular thickness (CMT) and BCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notations. Results: Mean age was 44.1 ± 9.3 (range: 24 to 64) years and mean follow-up period was 10.4 ± 11.2 (range: 3 to 43; median: 6) months. All patients demonstrated resolution of neurosensory detachment and improvement in visual acuity. At final visit, there was no significant difference in mean CMT between the IVB and observation groups (275 vs 284 μm, P> 0.05). Mean baseline logMAR visual acuity was 0.38 ± 0.24 in the IVB group which improved to 0.24 ± 0.31 at final follow-up (P = 0.011); mean baseline logMAR visual acuity was 0.42 ± 0.28 in the observation group and improved to 0.12 ± 0.18 (P = 0.001). Visual improvement was more marked in the observation group (0.30 vs 0.14 logMAR, P< 0.05) and mean final visual acuity was also significantly better (P = 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between IVB injection and observation in terms of anatomical outcomes of treatment for CSCR. In terms of visual outcomes, observation was superior to IVB injection.http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2016;volume=11;issue=1;spage=61;epage=65;aulast=ÜnlüIntravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin); Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Macular Thickness; Observation
spellingShingle Cihan Ünlü
Gurkan Erdogan
Tugba Aydogan
Betul Ilkay Sezgin Akcay
Esra Kardes
Gulunay Akcali Kiray
Tahir Kansu Bozkurt
Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin); Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Macular Thickness; Observation
title Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
title_full Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
title_fullStr Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
title_short Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
title_sort intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy
topic Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin); Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Macular Thickness; Observation
url http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2016;volume=11;issue=1;spage=61;epage=65;aulast=Ünlü
work_keys_str_mv AT cihanunlu intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT gurkanerdogan intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT tugbaaydogan intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT betulilkaysezginakcay intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT esrakardes intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT gulunayakcalikiray intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT tahirkansubozkurt intravitrealbevacizumabfortreatmentofcentralserouschorioretinopathy