Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?

Abstract Background Benin and Mali introduced user fee exemption policies focused on caesarean sections (C-sections) in 2005 and 2009, respectively. These policies had a positive impact on access to C-sections and facility based deliveries among all women, but the impact on socioeconomic inequality...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marion Ravit, Martine Audibert, Valéry Ridde, Myriam De Loenzien, Clémence Schantz, Alexandre Dumont
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x
_version_ 1811340145009360896
author Marion Ravit
Martine Audibert
Valéry Ridde
Myriam De Loenzien
Clémence Schantz
Alexandre Dumont
author_facet Marion Ravit
Martine Audibert
Valéry Ridde
Myriam De Loenzien
Clémence Schantz
Alexandre Dumont
author_sort Marion Ravit
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Benin and Mali introduced user fee exemption policies focused on caesarean sections (C-sections) in 2005 and 2009, respectively. These policies had a positive impact on access to C-sections and facility based deliveries among all women, but the impact on socioeconomic inequality is still highly uncertain. The objective of this study was to observe whether there was an increase or a decrease in urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after the free C-section policy was introduced. Methods We used data from three consecutive Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): 2001, 2006 and 2011–2012 in Benin and 2001, 2006 and 2012–13 in Mali. We evaluated trends in inequality in terms of two outcomes: C-sections and facility based deliveries. Adjusted odds ratios were used to estimate whether the distributions of C-sections and facility based deliveries favoured the least advantaged categories (rural, non-educated and poorest women) or the most advantaged categories (urban, educated and richest women). Concentration curves were used to observe the degree of wealth-related inequality in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries. Results We analysed 47,302 childbirths (23,266 in Benin and 24,036 in Mali). In Benin, we found no significant difference in access to C-sections between urban and rural women or between educated and non-educated women. However, the richest women had greater access to C-sections than the poorest women. There was no significant change in these inequalities in terms of access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after introduction of the free C-section policy. In Mali, we found a reduction in education-related inequalities in access to C-sections after implementation of the policy (p-value = 0.043). Inequalities between urban and rural areas had already decreased prior to implementation of the policy, but wealth-related inequalities were still present. Conclusions Urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in C-section access did not change substantially after the countries implemented free C-section policies. User fee exemption is not enough. We recommend switching to mechanisms that combine both a universal approach and targeted action for vulnerable populations to address this issue and ensure equal health care access for all individuals.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:37:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-338a34a23019401bacca44043d97c454
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-9276
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:37:48Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal for Equity in Health
spelling doaj.art-338a34a23019401bacca44043d97c4542022-12-22T02:34:50ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762018-06-0117111210.1186/s12939-018-0789-xDo free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?Marion Ravit0Martine Audibert1Valéry Ridde2Myriam De Loenzien3Clémence Schantz4Alexandre Dumont5IRD (French Institute For Research on sustainable Development), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUDUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, CERDIIRD (French Institute For Research on sustainable Development), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUDIRD (French Institute For Research on sustainable Development), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUDIRD (French Institute For Research on sustainable Development), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUDIRD (French Institute For Research on sustainable Development), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUDAbstract Background Benin and Mali introduced user fee exemption policies focused on caesarean sections (C-sections) in 2005 and 2009, respectively. These policies had a positive impact on access to C-sections and facility based deliveries among all women, but the impact on socioeconomic inequality is still highly uncertain. The objective of this study was to observe whether there was an increase or a decrease in urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after the free C-section policy was introduced. Methods We used data from three consecutive Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): 2001, 2006 and 2011–2012 in Benin and 2001, 2006 and 2012–13 in Mali. We evaluated trends in inequality in terms of two outcomes: C-sections and facility based deliveries. Adjusted odds ratios were used to estimate whether the distributions of C-sections and facility based deliveries favoured the least advantaged categories (rural, non-educated and poorest women) or the most advantaged categories (urban, educated and richest women). Concentration curves were used to observe the degree of wealth-related inequality in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries. Results We analysed 47,302 childbirths (23,266 in Benin and 24,036 in Mali). In Benin, we found no significant difference in access to C-sections between urban and rural women or between educated and non-educated women. However, the richest women had greater access to C-sections than the poorest women. There was no significant change in these inequalities in terms of access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after introduction of the free C-section policy. In Mali, we found a reduction in education-related inequalities in access to C-sections after implementation of the policy (p-value = 0.043). Inequalities between urban and rural areas had already decreased prior to implementation of the policy, but wealth-related inequalities were still present. Conclusions Urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in C-section access did not change substantially after the countries implemented free C-section policies. User fee exemption is not enough. We recommend switching to mechanisms that combine both a universal approach and targeted action for vulnerable populations to address this issue and ensure equal health care access for all individuals.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-018-0789-xCaesarean sectionLow-income countriesMaliBeninHealth policyUser fees
spellingShingle Marion Ravit
Martine Audibert
Valéry Ridde
Myriam De Loenzien
Clémence Schantz
Alexandre Dumont
Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
International Journal for Equity in Health
Caesarean section
Low-income countries
Mali
Benin
Health policy
User fees
title Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
title_full Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
title_fullStr Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
title_full_unstemmed Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
title_short Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
title_sort do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in benin and mali
topic Caesarean section
Low-income countries
Mali
Benin
Health policy
User fees
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x
work_keys_str_mv AT marionravit dofreecaesareansectionpoliciesincreaseinequalitiesinbeninandmali
AT martineaudibert dofreecaesareansectionpoliciesincreaseinequalitiesinbeninandmali
AT valeryridde dofreecaesareansectionpoliciesincreaseinequalitiesinbeninandmali
AT myriamdeloenzien dofreecaesareansectionpoliciesincreaseinequalitiesinbeninandmali
AT clemenceschantz dofreecaesareansectionpoliciesincreaseinequalitiesinbeninandmali
AT alexandredumont dofreecaesareansectionpoliciesincreaseinequalitiesinbeninandmali