Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection

Abstract Background Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophageal resection is crucial for the successful management of this complication. Inflammatory serological markers are indicators of complications during the postoperative course. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas F. Liesenfeld, Peter Sauer, Markus K. Diener, Ulf Hinz, Thomas Schmidt, Beat P. Müller-Stich, Thilo Hackert, Markus W. Büchler, Anja Schaible
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00995-2
_version_ 1818329807957524480
author Lukas F. Liesenfeld
Peter Sauer
Markus K. Diener
Ulf Hinz
Thomas Schmidt
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Thilo Hackert
Markus W. Büchler
Anja Schaible
author_facet Lukas F. Liesenfeld
Peter Sauer
Markus K. Diener
Ulf Hinz
Thomas Schmidt
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Thilo Hackert
Markus W. Büchler
Anja Schaible
author_sort Lukas F. Liesenfeld
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophageal resection is crucial for the successful management of this complication. Inflammatory serological markers are indicators of complications during the postoperative course. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of routine inflammatory markers to predict anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophageal resection. Methods Data from all consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic esophageal resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were analyzed from a prospective database. Besides clinicodemographic parameters, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and albumin were analyzed and the Noble/Underwood (NUn) score was calculated to evaluate their predictive value for postoperative anastomotic leakage. Diagnostic accuracy was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values using area under the receiver operator characteristics curve. Results Overall, 233 patients with transthoracic esophageal resection were analyzed, 30-day mortality in this group was 3.4%. 57 patients (24.5%) suffered from AL, 176 patients were in the AL negative group. We found significant differences in WBCC, CRP and NUn scores between patients with and without AL, but the analyzed markers did not show an independent relevant prognostic value. For CRP levels below 155 mg/dl from POD3 to POD 7 the negative predictive value for absence of AI was > 80%. Highest diagnostic accuracy was detected for CRP levels on 4th POD with a cut-off value of 145 mg/l reaching negative predictive value of 87%. Conclusions In contrast to their prognostic value in other surgical procedures, CRP, WBCC and NUn score cannot be recommended as independent markers for the prediction of anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophageal resection. CRP is an accurate negative predictive marker and discrimination of AL and no-AL may be helpful for postoperative clinical management. Trial registration The study was approved by the local ethical committee (S635-2013).
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:53:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-338ee37c04764331a6268953e960dd74
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:53:56Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-338ee37c04764331a6268953e960dd742022-12-21T23:45:14ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822020-12-0120111110.1186/s12893-020-00995-2Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resectionLukas F. Liesenfeld0Peter Sauer1Markus K. Diener2Ulf Hinz3Thomas Schmidt4Beat P. Müller-Stich5Thilo Hackert6Markus W. Büchler7Anja Schaible8Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Heidelberg University HospitalAbstract Background Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophageal resection is crucial for the successful management of this complication. Inflammatory serological markers are indicators of complications during the postoperative course. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of routine inflammatory markers to predict anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophageal resection. Methods Data from all consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic esophageal resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were analyzed from a prospective database. Besides clinicodemographic parameters, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and albumin were analyzed and the Noble/Underwood (NUn) score was calculated to evaluate their predictive value for postoperative anastomotic leakage. Diagnostic accuracy was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values using area under the receiver operator characteristics curve. Results Overall, 233 patients with transthoracic esophageal resection were analyzed, 30-day mortality in this group was 3.4%. 57 patients (24.5%) suffered from AL, 176 patients were in the AL negative group. We found significant differences in WBCC, CRP and NUn scores between patients with and without AL, but the analyzed markers did not show an independent relevant prognostic value. For CRP levels below 155 mg/dl from POD3 to POD 7 the negative predictive value for absence of AI was > 80%. Highest diagnostic accuracy was detected for CRP levels on 4th POD with a cut-off value of 145 mg/l reaching negative predictive value of 87%. Conclusions In contrast to their prognostic value in other surgical procedures, CRP, WBCC and NUn score cannot be recommended as independent markers for the prediction of anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophageal resection. CRP is an accurate negative predictive marker and discrimination of AL and no-AL may be helpful for postoperative clinical management. Trial registration The study was approved by the local ethical committee (S635-2013).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00995-2Esophageal carcinomaEsophageal resectionAnastomotic leakageWhite blood cell countC-reactive proteinNun score
spellingShingle Lukas F. Liesenfeld
Peter Sauer
Markus K. Diener
Ulf Hinz
Thomas Schmidt
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Thilo Hackert
Markus W. Büchler
Anja Schaible
Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
BMC Surgery
Esophageal carcinoma
Esophageal resection
Anastomotic leakage
White blood cell count
C-reactive protein
Nun score
title Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
title_full Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
title_fullStr Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
title_short Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
title_sort prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection
topic Esophageal carcinoma
Esophageal resection
Anastomotic leakage
White blood cell count
C-reactive protein
Nun score
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00995-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasfliesenfeld prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT petersauer prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT markuskdiener prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT ulfhinz prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT thomasschmidt prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT beatpmullerstich prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT thilohackert prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT markuswbuchler prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection
AT anjaschaible prognosticvalueofinflammatorymarkersfordetectinganastomoticleakageafteresophagealresection