A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy

Context: The benefit of malaria prophylaxis in pregnancy is threatened by emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial agents for chemoprophylaxis and treatment. Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZ) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for malaria...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rukiyat Adeola Abdus-Salam, Folasade Adenike Bello, Fatai A Fehintola, Ayodele O Arowojolu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2016;volume=23;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Abdus-Salam
_version_ 1819281894997491712
author Rukiyat Adeola Abdus-Salam
Folasade Adenike Bello
Fatai A Fehintola
Ayodele O Arowojolu
author_facet Rukiyat Adeola Abdus-Salam
Folasade Adenike Bello
Fatai A Fehintola
Ayodele O Arowojolu
author_sort Rukiyat Adeola Abdus-Salam
collection DOAJ
description Context: The benefit of malaria prophylaxis in pregnancy is threatened by emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial agents for chemoprophylaxis and treatment. Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZ) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for malaria prevention. Settings and Design: A prospective comparative study of antenatal clinic attendees at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Participants were randomised to receive SP or AZ. Subjects and Methods: The subjects were antenatal attendees and Samples for malaria parasitaemia were collected and repeated at follow-up visits; maternal peripheral blood film, placental and cord blood samples were collected at delivery. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test and t-test in a per-protocol analysis. Results: Of 200 participants (100 in each group), 166 (83.0%) completed the study: 86 (86.0%) of SP and 80 (80.0%) of AZ groups, respectively (P = 0.26). Four (4.7%) participants who had SP compared to five (6.2%) in AZ group developed malaria at mean gestational ages of 30.3 ± 1.56 and 33.0 ± 8.6, respectively (P = 0.56). Positive peripheral, placental and cord blood parasitaemia were found in ≤2% of the participants. Drug tolerability and foetal outcomes were comparable for both groups. Conclusion: AZ was comparable to SP for prevention of malaria in pregnancy and may be used in patients who do not tolerate SP.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T01:06:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3394478bff5a4c5bb53af99f722adc52
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1117-1936
2468-6875
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T01:06:57Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-3394478bff5a4c5bb53af99f722adc522022-12-21T17:23:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal1117-19362468-68752016-01-01232576110.4103/1117-1936.186295A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancyRukiyat Adeola Abdus-SalamFolasade Adenike BelloFatai A FehintolaAyodele O ArowojoluContext: The benefit of malaria prophylaxis in pregnancy is threatened by emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial agents for chemoprophylaxis and treatment. Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZ) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for malaria prevention. Settings and Design: A prospective comparative study of antenatal clinic attendees at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Participants were randomised to receive SP or AZ. Subjects and Methods: The subjects were antenatal attendees and Samples for malaria parasitaemia were collected and repeated at follow-up visits; maternal peripheral blood film, placental and cord blood samples were collected at delivery. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test and t-test in a per-protocol analysis. Results: Of 200 participants (100 in each group), 166 (83.0%) completed the study: 86 (86.0%) of SP and 80 (80.0%) of AZ groups, respectively (P = 0.26). Four (4.7%) participants who had SP compared to five (6.2%) in AZ group developed malaria at mean gestational ages of 30.3 ± 1.56 and 33.0 ± 8.6, respectively (P = 0.56). Positive peripheral, placental and cord blood parasitaemia were found in ≤2% of the participants. Drug tolerability and foetal outcomes were comparable for both groups. Conclusion: AZ was comparable to SP for prevention of malaria in pregnancy and may be used in patients who do not tolerate SP.http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2016;volume=23;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Abdus-Salamazithromycinintermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancysulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
spellingShingle Rukiyat Adeola Abdus-Salam
Folasade Adenike Bello
Fatai A Fehintola
Ayodele O Arowojolu
A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
azithromycin
intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy
sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
title A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
title_full A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
title_fullStr A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
title_short A comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
title_sort comparative study of azithromycin and sulphadoxine pyrimethamine as prophylaxis against malaria in pregnancy
topic azithromycin
intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy
sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
url http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2016;volume=23;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Abdus-Salam
work_keys_str_mv AT rukiyatadeolaabdussalam acomparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT folasadeadenikebello acomparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT fataiafehintola acomparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT ayodeleoarowojolu acomparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT rukiyatadeolaabdussalam comparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT folasadeadenikebello comparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT fataiafehintola comparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy
AT ayodeleoarowojolu comparativestudyofazithromycinandsulphadoxinepyrimethamineasprophylaxisagainstmalariainpregnancy