Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation

Spatial interpolation techniques play an important role in hydrology, as many point observations need to be interpolated to create continuous surfaces. Despite the availability of several tools and methods for interpolating data, not all of them work consistently for hydrologic applications. One of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianle Xu, Venkatesh Merwade, Zhiquan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/15/3844
_version_ 1797586011401748480
author Tianle Xu
Venkatesh Merwade
Zhiquan Wang
author_facet Tianle Xu
Venkatesh Merwade
Zhiquan Wang
author_sort Tianle Xu
collection DOAJ
description Spatial interpolation techniques play an important role in hydrology, as many point observations need to be interpolated to create continuous surfaces. Despite the availability of several tools and methods for interpolating data, not all of them work consistently for hydrologic applications. One of the techniques, the Laplace Equation, which is used in hydrology for creating flownets, has rarely been used for data interpolation. The objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of Laplace formulation (LF) in interpolating data used in hydrologic applications (hydrologic data) and compare it with other widely used methods such as inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbor, and ordinary kriging. The performance of LF interpolation with other methods is evaluated using quantitative measures, including root mean squared error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) for accuracy, visual assessment for surface quality, and computational cost for operational efficiency and speed. Data related to surface elevation, river bathymetry, precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture are used for different areas in the United States. RMSE and R<sup>2</sup> results show that LF is comparable to other methods for accuracy. LF is easy to use as it requires fewer input parameters compared to inverse distance weighting (IDW) and Kriging. Computationally, LF is faster than other methods in terms of speed when the datasets are not large. Overall, LF offers a robust alternative to existing methods for interpolating various hydrologic data. Further work is required to improve its computational efficiency.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:17:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-33b928ea6e014cb3bda734b6c0b02d01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:17:15Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-33b928ea6e014cb3bda734b6c0b02d012023-11-18T23:31:37ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-08-011515384410.3390/rs15153844Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace FormulationTianle Xu0Venkatesh Merwade1Zhiquan Wang2Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USALyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USADepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USASpatial interpolation techniques play an important role in hydrology, as many point observations need to be interpolated to create continuous surfaces. Despite the availability of several tools and methods for interpolating data, not all of them work consistently for hydrologic applications. One of the techniques, the Laplace Equation, which is used in hydrology for creating flownets, has rarely been used for data interpolation. The objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of Laplace formulation (LF) in interpolating data used in hydrologic applications (hydrologic data) and compare it with other widely used methods such as inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbor, and ordinary kriging. The performance of LF interpolation with other methods is evaluated using quantitative measures, including root mean squared error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) for accuracy, visual assessment for surface quality, and computational cost for operational efficiency and speed. Data related to surface elevation, river bathymetry, precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture are used for different areas in the United States. RMSE and R<sup>2</sup> results show that LF is comparable to other methods for accuracy. LF is easy to use as it requires fewer input parameters compared to inverse distance weighting (IDW) and Kriging. Computationally, LF is faster than other methods in terms of speed when the datasets are not large. Overall, LF offers a robust alternative to existing methods for interpolating various hydrologic data. Further work is required to improve its computational efficiency.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/15/3844spatial interpolationhydrologic dataLaplace equationIDWnatural neighborordinary kriging
spellingShingle Tianle Xu
Venkatesh Merwade
Zhiquan Wang
Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation
Remote Sensing
spatial interpolation
hydrologic data
Laplace equation
IDW
natural neighbor
ordinary kriging
title Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation
title_full Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation
title_fullStr Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation
title_full_unstemmed Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation
title_short Interpolating Hydrologic Data Using Laplace Formulation
title_sort interpolating hydrologic data using laplace formulation
topic spatial interpolation
hydrologic data
Laplace equation
IDW
natural neighbor
ordinary kriging
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/15/3844
work_keys_str_mv AT tianlexu interpolatinghydrologicdatausinglaplaceformulation
AT venkateshmerwade interpolatinghydrologicdatausinglaplaceformulation
AT zhiquanwang interpolatinghydrologicdatausinglaplaceformulation