QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA

Using 84 structurally diverse and experimentally validated LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were built by OECD requirements. In the QSAR analysis, certainly significant and understated pharmacophoric features were identified as critical for LSD1 inhib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rahul D. Jawarkar, Ravindra L. Bakal, Nobendu Mukherjee, Arabinda Ghosh, Magdi E. A. Zaki, Sami A. AL-Hussain, Aamal A. Al-Mutairi, Abdul Samad, Ajaykumar Gandhi, Vijay H. Masand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/15/4758
_version_ 1797412973316145152
author Rahul D. Jawarkar
Ravindra L. Bakal
Nobendu Mukherjee
Arabinda Ghosh
Magdi E. A. Zaki
Sami A. AL-Hussain
Aamal A. Al-Mutairi
Abdul Samad
Ajaykumar Gandhi
Vijay H. Masand
author_facet Rahul D. Jawarkar
Ravindra L. Bakal
Nobendu Mukherjee
Arabinda Ghosh
Magdi E. A. Zaki
Sami A. AL-Hussain
Aamal A. Al-Mutairi
Abdul Samad
Ajaykumar Gandhi
Vijay H. Masand
author_sort Rahul D. Jawarkar
collection DOAJ
description Using 84 structurally diverse and experimentally validated LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were built by OECD requirements. In the QSAR analysis, certainly significant and understated pharmacophoric features were identified as critical for LSD1 inhibition, such as a ring Carbon atom with exactly six bonds from a Nitrogen atom, partial charges of lipophilic atoms within eight bonds from a ring Sulphur atom, a non-ring Oxygen atom exactly nine bonds from the amide Nitrogen, etc. The genetic algorithm–multi-linear regression (GA-MLR) and double cross-validation criteria were used to create robust QSAR models with high predictability. In this study, two QSAR models were developed, with fitting parameters like R<sup>2</sup> = 0.83–0.81, F = 61.22–67.96, internal validation parameters such as Q<sup>2</sup><sub>LOO</sub> = 0.79–0.77, Q<sup>2</sup><sub>LMO</sub> = 0.78–0.76, CCC<sub>cv</sub> = 0.89–0.88, and external validation parameters such as, R2ext = 0.82 and CCCex = 0.90. In terms of mechanistic interpretation and statistical analysis, both QSAR models are well-balanced. Furthermore, utilizing the pharmacophoric features revealed by QSAR modelling, molecular docking experiments corroborated with the most active compound’s binding to the LSD1 receptor. The docking results are then refined using Molecular dynamic simulation and MMGBSA analysis. As a consequence, the findings of the study can be used to produce LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors as anticancer leads.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:10:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-33c24f28429b457cb18ad11f3a4b7291
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:10:49Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-33c24f28429b457cb18ad11f3a4b72912023-12-03T12:49:30ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492022-07-012715475810.3390/molecules27154758QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSARahul D. Jawarkar0Ravindra L. Bakal1Nobendu Mukherjee2Arabinda Ghosh3Magdi E. A. Zaki4Sami A. AL-Hussain5Aamal A. Al-Mutairi6Abdul Samad7Ajaykumar Gandhi8Vijay H. Masand9Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Dr Rajendra Gode Institute of Pharmacy, University Mardi Road, Amravati 444603, IndiaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Dr Rajendra Gode Institute of Pharmacy, University Mardi Road, Amravati 444603, IndiaDepartment of Microbiology, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary College, Kolkata 700118, IndiaMicrobiology Division, Department of Botany, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, IndiaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 13318, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 13318, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 13318, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tishk International University, Erbil 44001, IraqDepartment of Chemistry, Government Arts and Science College, Karur 639005, IndiaDepartment of Chemistry, Vidyabharati Mahavidyalalya, Camp, Amravati 444602, IndiaUsing 84 structurally diverse and experimentally validated LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were built by OECD requirements. In the QSAR analysis, certainly significant and understated pharmacophoric features were identified as critical for LSD1 inhibition, such as a ring Carbon atom with exactly six bonds from a Nitrogen atom, partial charges of lipophilic atoms within eight bonds from a ring Sulphur atom, a non-ring Oxygen atom exactly nine bonds from the amide Nitrogen, etc. The genetic algorithm–multi-linear regression (GA-MLR) and double cross-validation criteria were used to create robust QSAR models with high predictability. In this study, two QSAR models were developed, with fitting parameters like R<sup>2</sup> = 0.83–0.81, F = 61.22–67.96, internal validation parameters such as Q<sup>2</sup><sub>LOO</sub> = 0.79–0.77, Q<sup>2</sup><sub>LMO</sub> = 0.78–0.76, CCC<sub>cv</sub> = 0.89–0.88, and external validation parameters such as, R2ext = 0.82 and CCCex = 0.90. In terms of mechanistic interpretation and statistical analysis, both QSAR models are well-balanced. Furthermore, utilizing the pharmacophoric features revealed by QSAR modelling, molecular docking experiments corroborated with the most active compound’s binding to the LSD1 receptor. The docking results are then refined using Molecular dynamic simulation and MMGBSA analysis. As a consequence, the findings of the study can be used to produce LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors as anticancer leads.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/15/4758LSD1KDM1AQSARanticancermolecular dockingMD simulation
spellingShingle Rahul D. Jawarkar
Ravindra L. Bakal
Nobendu Mukherjee
Arabinda Ghosh
Magdi E. A. Zaki
Sami A. AL-Hussain
Aamal A. Al-Mutairi
Abdul Samad
Ajaykumar Gandhi
Vijay H. Masand
QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA
Molecules
LSD1
KDM1A
QSAR
anticancer
molecular docking
MD simulation
title QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA
title_full QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA
title_fullStr QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA
title_full_unstemmed QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA
title_short QSAR Evaluations to Unravel the Structural Features in Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitors for Novel Anticancer Lead Development Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation and MMGBSA
title_sort qsar evaluations to unravel the structural features in lysine specific histone demethylase 1a inhibitors for novel anticancer lead development supported by molecular docking md simulation and mmgbsa
topic LSD1
KDM1A
QSAR
anticancer
molecular docking
MD simulation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/15/4758
work_keys_str_mv AT rahuldjawarkar qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT ravindralbakal qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT nobendumukherjee qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT arabindaghosh qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT magdieazaki qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT samiaalhussain qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT aamalaalmutairi qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT abdulsamad qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT ajaykumargandhi qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa
AT vijayhmasand qsarevaluationstounravelthestructuralfeaturesinlysinespecifichistonedemethylase1ainhibitorsfornovelanticancerleaddevelopmentsupportedbymoleculardockingmdsimulationandmmgbsa