Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists

This study contributes to the therapist variable in general and the personality profile of securely and insecurely attached psychotherapists and other healthcare professionals in particular. In a preceding study, it has been found that insecurely attached psychotherapists differ in nine personality...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burkhard Peter, Thomas G. Wolf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662828/full
_version_ 1818357238033547264
author Burkhard Peter
Burkhard Peter
Thomas G. Wolf
Thomas G. Wolf
author_facet Burkhard Peter
Burkhard Peter
Thomas G. Wolf
Thomas G. Wolf
author_sort Burkhard Peter
collection DOAJ
description This study contributes to the therapist variable in general and the personality profile of securely and insecurely attached psychotherapists and other healthcare professionals in particular. In a preceding study, it has been found that insecurely attached psychotherapists differ in nine personality styles from securely attached ones. The aim of the present study was to replicate these findings and to investigate whether they also apply to other health professions such as dentists. About 891 subjects from two German professional societies for hypnosis were surveyed online with a personality questionnaire [Personality Styles and Disorder Inventory (PSDI)] and an attachment questionnaire [Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ)]. Since these subjects were interested in hypnosis and used it in their practice (HYP), 150 dentists without a hypnosis context (NONHYP) were studied as a control group with the same survey. The results of the preceding attachment study could be replicated: Insecurely attached healthcare professionals differed significantly from securely attached ones in the same nine (plus one, i.e., 10) personality styles if they use psychological methods including hypnosis. If they do not use psychological methods (like the NONHYP dentists), they differ in half of the personality styles. No within-sample and no between-sample differences have been found in the assertive/antisocial (AS) personality style. No within-sample differences have also been found in the conscientious/compulsive (ZW) and the intuitive/schizotypal (ST) personality styles. However, large between-sample differences were obvious in ZW and the ST. Both of the samples of the dentist were much more compulsive than the two psychotherapeutic samples. In addition, both of the HYP samples were much more schizotypal than the NONHYP samples. The latter is the general signature of those individuals who are interested in hypnosis and were metaphorically termed homo hypnoticus. It seems that AS, ZW, and ST are independent of attachment.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T20:09:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-33ca3946e3c14acf9f41563e0aed1fc2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T20:09:55Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-33ca3946e3c14acf9f41563e0aed1fc22022-12-21T23:32:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-10-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.662828662828Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and DentistsBurkhard Peter0Burkhard Peter1Thomas G. Wolf2Thomas G. Wolf3MEG-Stiftung München, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, GermanyThis study contributes to the therapist variable in general and the personality profile of securely and insecurely attached psychotherapists and other healthcare professionals in particular. In a preceding study, it has been found that insecurely attached psychotherapists differ in nine personality styles from securely attached ones. The aim of the present study was to replicate these findings and to investigate whether they also apply to other health professions such as dentists. About 891 subjects from two German professional societies for hypnosis were surveyed online with a personality questionnaire [Personality Styles and Disorder Inventory (PSDI)] and an attachment questionnaire [Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ)]. Since these subjects were interested in hypnosis and used it in their practice (HYP), 150 dentists without a hypnosis context (NONHYP) were studied as a control group with the same survey. The results of the preceding attachment study could be replicated: Insecurely attached healthcare professionals differed significantly from securely attached ones in the same nine (plus one, i.e., 10) personality styles if they use psychological methods including hypnosis. If they do not use psychological methods (like the NONHYP dentists), they differ in half of the personality styles. No within-sample and no between-sample differences have been found in the assertive/antisocial (AS) personality style. No within-sample differences have also been found in the conscientious/compulsive (ZW) and the intuitive/schizotypal (ST) personality styles. However, large between-sample differences were obvious in ZW and the ST. Both of the samples of the dentist were much more compulsive than the two psychotherapeutic samples. In addition, both of the HYP samples were much more schizotypal than the NONHYP samples. The latter is the general signature of those individuals who are interested in hypnosis and were metaphorically termed homo hypnoticus. It seems that AS, ZW, and ST are independent of attachment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662828/fulldentistpsychotherapisthomo hypnoticushypnosispersonalityattachment
spellingShingle Burkhard Peter
Burkhard Peter
Thomas G. Wolf
Thomas G. Wolf
Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists
Frontiers in Psychology
dentist
psychotherapist
homo hypnoticus
hypnosis
personality
attachment
title Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists
title_full Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists
title_fullStr Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists
title_full_unstemmed Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists
title_short Replication Studies on Significant Differences in Personality Profiles of Securely and Insecurely Attached Psychotherapists and Dentists
title_sort replication studies on significant differences in personality profiles of securely and insecurely attached psychotherapists and dentists
topic dentist
psychotherapist
homo hypnoticus
hypnosis
personality
attachment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662828/full
work_keys_str_mv AT burkhardpeter replicationstudiesonsignificantdifferencesinpersonalityprofilesofsecurelyandinsecurelyattachedpsychotherapistsanddentists
AT burkhardpeter replicationstudiesonsignificantdifferencesinpersonalityprofilesofsecurelyandinsecurelyattachedpsychotherapistsanddentists
AT thomasgwolf replicationstudiesonsignificantdifferencesinpersonalityprofilesofsecurelyandinsecurelyattachedpsychotherapistsanddentists
AT thomasgwolf replicationstudiesonsignificantdifferencesinpersonalityprofilesofsecurelyandinsecurelyattachedpsychotherapistsanddentists