A scoping review of retracted publications in anesthesiology
Context: Fraudulent publication is a scourge of scientific research. Objectives: This scoping review was aimed at characterizing retracted publications for fraud or plagiarism in the field of anesthesia. Does the reputation of the journal (Quartile and Impact Factor, IF) protect the reader from the...
Main Authors: | Marco Fiore, Aniello Alfieri, Maria Caterina Pace, Vittorio Simeon, Paolo Chiodini, Sebastiano Leone, Stefan Wirz, Arturo Cuomo, Vincenzo Stoia, Marco Cascella |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=2;spage=179;epage=188;aulast= |
Similar Items
-
Utilizing ChatGPT in clinical research related to anesthesiology: a comprehensive review of opportunities and limitations
by: Sang-Wook Lee, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Retractions of research papers by authors from the Arab region (1998-2018)
by: Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Mapping multicenter randomized controlled trials in anesthesiology: a scoping review
by: Sylvain Boet, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Burnout in anesthesiology
by: Ana Rafaela Campos Sousa, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Telemedicine is a Challenging Need for Anesthesiology
by: Mahtab Poor Zamany Nejat Kermany
Published: (2023-09-01)