Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia

Fee-based agricultural extension programmes have been proposed in response to the constraints of funding public extension services. This has piqued researchers' interest in determining farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for extension services in recent decades. The current study examines fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adewale M. Ogunmodede, Justice A. Tambo, Adetunji T. Adeleke, Dominic M. Gulak, Mary O. Ogunsanwo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2082018
_version_ 1797680406726705152
author Adewale M. Ogunmodede
Justice A. Tambo
Adetunji T. Adeleke
Dominic M. Gulak
Mary O. Ogunsanwo
author_facet Adewale M. Ogunmodede
Justice A. Tambo
Adetunji T. Adeleke
Dominic M. Gulak
Mary O. Ogunsanwo
author_sort Adewale M. Ogunmodede
collection DOAJ
description Fee-based agricultural extension programmes have been proposed in response to the constraints of funding public extension services. This has piqued researchers' interest in determining farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for extension services in recent decades. The current study examines farmers' WTP to ensure the sustainability of plant clinics. Smallholder farmers in over 30 countries benefit from this demand-driven extension method, which delivers plant health diagnostic and consulting services. External funders are now paying the plant clinic operations, which raises worries about their long-term viability if the funding stops. We used survey data from 602, 637, and 837 households in Bangladesh, Rwanda, and Zambia. We discovered that roughly 64% of the sample farmers were willing to pay an amount sufficient to cover the operational costs of an established plant clinic using the iterative bidding technique of eliciting WTP. Farmers in Bangladesh, Rwanda, and Zambia were willing to spend an average of 0.27USD, 0.85USD, and 2.25USD per visit to plant clinics. According to our findings, farmers appear to value the plant clinic extension method and are eager to contribute to its long-term viability. Therefore, piloting fee-paying plant clinic services to determine farmers' actual WTP and preferred payment options would be beneficial.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:29:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-33de20acebff409ba66a7d67c2cfca83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1473-5903
1747-762X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:29:33Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
spelling doaj.art-33de20acebff409ba66a7d67c2cfca832023-09-20T10:18:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability1473-59031747-762X2022-12-012071360137210.1080/14735903.2022.20820182082018Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and ZambiaAdewale M. Ogunmodede0Justice A. Tambo1Adetunji T. Adeleke2Dominic M. Gulak3Mary O. Ogunsanwo4Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)Cranfield UniversityUniversity of Ibadan, Department of Agricultural EconomicsOlabisi Onabanjo University, Department of Agricultural EconomicsFee-based agricultural extension programmes have been proposed in response to the constraints of funding public extension services. This has piqued researchers' interest in determining farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for extension services in recent decades. The current study examines farmers' WTP to ensure the sustainability of plant clinics. Smallholder farmers in over 30 countries benefit from this demand-driven extension method, which delivers plant health diagnostic and consulting services. External funders are now paying the plant clinic operations, which raises worries about their long-term viability if the funding stops. We used survey data from 602, 637, and 837 households in Bangladesh, Rwanda, and Zambia. We discovered that roughly 64% of the sample farmers were willing to pay an amount sufficient to cover the operational costs of an established plant clinic using the iterative bidding technique of eliciting WTP. Farmers in Bangladesh, Rwanda, and Zambia were willing to spend an average of 0.27USD, 0.85USD, and 2.25USD per visit to plant clinics. According to our findings, farmers appear to value the plant clinic extension method and are eager to contribute to its long-term viability. Therefore, piloting fee-paying plant clinic services to determine farmers' actual WTP and preferred payment options would be beneficial.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2082018plant clinicswillingness-to-payagricultural extensionsmallholder farmerssustainabilityadoption
spellingShingle Adewale M. Ogunmodede
Justice A. Tambo
Adetunji T. Adeleke
Dominic M. Gulak
Mary O. Ogunsanwo
Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
plant clinics
willingness-to-pay
agricultural extension
smallholder farmers
sustainability
adoption
title Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia
title_full Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia
title_fullStr Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia
title_full_unstemmed Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia
title_short Farmers’ willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics: evidence from Bangladesh, Rwanda and Zambia
title_sort farmers willingness to pay towards the sustainability of plant clinics evidence from bangladesh rwanda and zambia
topic plant clinics
willingness-to-pay
agricultural extension
smallholder farmers
sustainability
adoption
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2082018
work_keys_str_mv AT adewalemogunmodede farmerswillingnesstopaytowardsthesustainabilityofplantclinicsevidencefrombangladeshrwandaandzambia
AT justiceatambo farmerswillingnesstopaytowardsthesustainabilityofplantclinicsevidencefrombangladeshrwandaandzambia
AT adetunjitadeleke farmerswillingnesstopaytowardsthesustainabilityofplantclinicsevidencefrombangladeshrwandaandzambia
AT dominicmgulak farmerswillingnesstopaytowardsthesustainabilityofplantclinicsevidencefrombangladeshrwandaandzambia
AT maryoogunsanwo farmerswillingnesstopaytowardsthesustainabilityofplantclinicsevidencefrombangladeshrwandaandzambia