Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study

Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Objectives The main objective of this study is to evaluate the methodological quality and reporting quality of living systematic reviews (LSRs) on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while the secondary objective is to investigate potential factors that may influence the overall quality of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jiefeng Luo, Zhe Chen, Dan Liu, Hailong Li, Siyi He, Linan Zeng, Mengting Yang, Zheng Liu, Xue Xiao, Lingli Zhang
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMC 2023-07-01
Series:	BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:	Living systematic review Coronavirus disease 2019 Systematic review Methodological quality Reporting quality
Online Access:	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01980-y

Similar Items

Characteristics of Living Systematic Review for COVID-19
by: Chen Z, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
by: Kusala Pussegoda, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
by: Kusala Pussegoda, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on health effects of air pollutants were higher than extreme temperatures: a comparative study
by: Xuping Song, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

A Methodological Review of the Articles Publishes in Georgia Educational Researcher from 2003-2010
by: Justus Randolph, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01)

Quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in coronavirus disease 2019 and venous thromboembolism: An analysis using a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews-2
by: Sultan Alkhamesi, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
by: Patrick Sequeira-Byron, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
by: Matthew J. Page, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
by: Cecilia Superchi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
by: Matthew J. Page, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions
by: Francisco Gómez-García, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

Qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileiros
by: Ana Paula Couto Zoltowski, et al.

Investigate the relationship between the retraction reasons and the quality of methodology in non-Cochrane retracted systematic reviews: a systematic review
by: Azita Shahraki-Mohammadi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Evaluating the Characteristics, Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by Using the Veritas Plot
by: Huang F, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
by: Tanya Millard, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Reporting quality of acupuncture overviews: A methodological investigation based on the PRIOR statement
by: Tingting Lu, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
by: Jasmin Helbach, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Quality of systematic reviews in African emergency medicine: a cross-sectional methodological study
by: J. van Niekerk, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

The methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional systemic review
by: Jiajie Yu, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Methodological quality and reporting standards in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of physical activity studies: a report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)
by: Nórton Luís Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Methodological quality for systematic reviews of adverse events with surgical interventions: a cross-sectional survey
by: Xiaoqin Zhou, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review
by: Natasha Hudek, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability
by: Nour Shaheen, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Health-Related Quality of Life in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Methodological Appraisal Based on a Systematic Literature Review
by: Lotte Van Der Weijst, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Study publication date should not dictate suitability of methodological and reporting quality assessment
by: Rafael Leite Pacheco, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Overview of systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges: methodologies and recommendations for practice
by: Lewis Cooney, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
by: Jhony de Almeida Estevam, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Methodologic quality and risk-of-bias in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a review of methods
by: Cristine Miron Stefani, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01)

Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Integrated Care: Evidence from a Systematic Review
by: Mudathira Kadu, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
by: Vanessa Palmeri, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
by: Dawid Pieper, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Evaluation of methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in veterinary journals with amstar
by: Ender UZABACI, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

A systematic review of the factors significantly influencing the quality of life of living liver donors
by: Yuexian Shi, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: methodological quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews
by: Jia Yuan, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

How to Report Systematic Review Studies; A Critical Review of Some Methodological Issues and Recommendations to Consider When Conducting These Studies
by: Mehrdad Amir Behghadami, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease before and after PRISMA introduction
by: Xiao Sun, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Published in Chinese Science Citation Database Journals
by: LIU Hui, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study
by: Qiuyi Zheng, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Value relevance in assessing the quality of financial reports: A systematic literature review
by: Achmad Farid Dedyansyah, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
by: Penny Whiting, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)