Robotic sacrocolpopexy
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common cause of gynecological disease in elderly women. The prevalence of POP has increased with an aging society. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) is safer and more effective than the vaginal approach in patients with apical compartment POP because it has a higher ana...
| Glavni autori: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Članak |
| Jezik: | English |
| Izdano: |
Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2024-03-01
|
| Serija: | Obstetrics & Gynecology Science |
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | http://ogscience.org/upload/pdf/ogs-23226.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827317889354432512 |
|---|---|
| author | Al-Otaibi Mozon Ju Hee Kim Sa Ra Lee |
| author_facet | Al-Otaibi Mozon Ju Hee Kim Sa Ra Lee |
| author_sort | Al-Otaibi Mozon |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common cause of gynecological disease in elderly women. The prevalence of POP has increased with an aging society. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) is safer and more effective than the vaginal approach in patients with apical compartment POP because it has a higher anatomical cure rate, a lower recurrence rate, less dyspareunia, and improved sexual function. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has replaced ASC. Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) also helps overcome the challenges of LSC by facilitating deep pelvic dissection and multiple intracorporeal suturing. The RSC is technically easy to apply, has a steep learning curve, and offers many advantages over the LSC. However, insufficient data led us to conclude that the LSC is superior overall, especially in terms of cost-effectiveness. The present review provides insights into different aspects of RSC, highlighting the most common benefits and concerns of this procedure. We searched for eligible articles discussing this issue from January 2019 to March 2022 to reveal the outcomes of RSC. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T23:48:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-33fd5616c6ae4f6c88714f4b8b549c36 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2287-8572 2287-8580 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T23:48:29Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Obstetrics & Gynecology Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-33fd5616c6ae4f6c88714f4b8b549c362024-03-15T02:07:37ZengKorean Society of Obstetrics and GynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology Science2287-85722287-85802024-03-0167221221710.5468/ogs.232268802Robotic sacrocolpopexyAl-Otaibi Mozon0Ju Hee Kim1Sa Ra Lee2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common cause of gynecological disease in elderly women. The prevalence of POP has increased with an aging society. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) is safer and more effective than the vaginal approach in patients with apical compartment POP because it has a higher anatomical cure rate, a lower recurrence rate, less dyspareunia, and improved sexual function. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has replaced ASC. Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) also helps overcome the challenges of LSC by facilitating deep pelvic dissection and multiple intracorporeal suturing. The RSC is technically easy to apply, has a steep learning curve, and offers many advantages over the LSC. However, insufficient data led us to conclude that the LSC is superior overall, especially in terms of cost-effectiveness. The present review provides insights into different aspects of RSC, highlighting the most common benefits and concerns of this procedure. We searched for eligible articles discussing this issue from January 2019 to March 2022 to reveal the outcomes of RSC.http://ogscience.org/upload/pdf/ogs-23226.pdfpelvic organ prolapserobotic surgical proceduresacrocolpopexysurgical meshminimally invasive surgical procedures |
| spellingShingle | Al-Otaibi Mozon Ju Hee Kim Sa Ra Lee Robotic sacrocolpopexy Obstetrics & Gynecology Science pelvic organ prolapse robotic surgical procedure sacrocolpopexy surgical mesh minimally invasive surgical procedures |
| title | Robotic sacrocolpopexy |
| title_full | Robotic sacrocolpopexy |
| title_fullStr | Robotic sacrocolpopexy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Robotic sacrocolpopexy |
| title_short | Robotic sacrocolpopexy |
| title_sort | robotic sacrocolpopexy |
| topic | pelvic organ prolapse robotic surgical procedure sacrocolpopexy surgical mesh minimally invasive surgical procedures |
| url | http://ogscience.org/upload/pdf/ogs-23226.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alotaibimozon roboticsacrocolpopexy AT juheekim roboticsacrocolpopexy AT saralee roboticsacrocolpopexy |