Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis

Objective To evaluate the effect of level 1, high observation beds (HOBs) compared with high dependency unit (HDU) and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) admission on service provision, such as cancelled operations, and healthcare costs.Methods A retrospective, observational, single-centre cro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vassili Crispi, William Bolton, Ian Anderson, Rebecca Town
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e073461.full
_version_ 1797745390449065984
author Vassili Crispi
William Bolton
Ian Anderson
Rebecca Town
author_facet Vassili Crispi
William Bolton
Ian Anderson
Rebecca Town
author_sort Vassili Crispi
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the effect of level 1, high observation beds (HOBs) compared with high dependency unit (HDU) and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) admission on service provision, such as cancelled operations, and healthcare costs.Methods A retrospective, observational, single-centre cross-sectional study at a single, large UK neurosurgical centre. All adult patients admitted to neurosurgical HOBs between December 2021 and July 2022 were included. The list of cancelled procedures was collected from 2019 to 2022. To evaluate the impact of admission of eligible patients to HOBs, the total bed days, cost per bed day, number of admissions and cost per admission were obtained for all clinical areas the financial years 2019/2020 and 2021/2022.Results 307 patients were included in the study: 59.7% of HOBs admissions were elective and 37.7% were acute; admissions were for cranial procedures or conservative treatment (64.8%), spinal (32.6%) or other (2.6%). Following admission, 73.3% of patients were stepped down to the ward prior to discharge home. Only seven patients required escalation to level-2 or level-3 care. Overall, 97% of all HOBs patients were discharged home at the end of hospital stay. Occupancy rate was 90.4%.The cost of bed day increased from ward, level 0 (£384), then level 1 (£376), to level 2 (£787–1211) and to level 3 (£1628). From 2019 to 2021, 558 operations had been cancelled, and 140 (37.8%) of 370 were estimated to have been potentially avoided by HOBs admissions due to conflict of scheduling, ward bed capacity and critical care bed capacity. In addition, a minimum total expenditure due to cancelled operations was estimated at £22 923.50 yearly on average.Conclusion This study recognises HOBs growing role in the management of acutely unwell patients in ward-based environments. While recognising the associated challenges, this study highlighted the potential in reducing healthcare costs. Further studies should evaluate the impact and limitations of HOBs on patients’ recovery and outcomes, compared to HDU and NICU.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:22:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3400122dccdc419fbd960d0aa71301f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:22:36Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj.art-3400122dccdc419fbd960d0aa71301f12023-08-10T22:40:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552023-07-0113710.1136/bmjopen-2023-073461Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysisVassili Crispi0William Bolton1Ian Anderson2Rebecca Town3Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UKDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UKDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UKDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UKObjective To evaluate the effect of level 1, high observation beds (HOBs) compared with high dependency unit (HDU) and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) admission on service provision, such as cancelled operations, and healthcare costs.Methods A retrospective, observational, single-centre cross-sectional study at a single, large UK neurosurgical centre. All adult patients admitted to neurosurgical HOBs between December 2021 and July 2022 were included. The list of cancelled procedures was collected from 2019 to 2022. To evaluate the impact of admission of eligible patients to HOBs, the total bed days, cost per bed day, number of admissions and cost per admission were obtained for all clinical areas the financial years 2019/2020 and 2021/2022.Results 307 patients were included in the study: 59.7% of HOBs admissions were elective and 37.7% were acute; admissions were for cranial procedures or conservative treatment (64.8%), spinal (32.6%) or other (2.6%). Following admission, 73.3% of patients were stepped down to the ward prior to discharge home. Only seven patients required escalation to level-2 or level-3 care. Overall, 97% of all HOBs patients were discharged home at the end of hospital stay. Occupancy rate was 90.4%.The cost of bed day increased from ward, level 0 (£384), then level 1 (£376), to level 2 (£787–1211) and to level 3 (£1628). From 2019 to 2021, 558 operations had been cancelled, and 140 (37.8%) of 370 were estimated to have been potentially avoided by HOBs admissions due to conflict of scheduling, ward bed capacity and critical care bed capacity. In addition, a minimum total expenditure due to cancelled operations was estimated at £22 923.50 yearly on average.Conclusion This study recognises HOBs growing role in the management of acutely unwell patients in ward-based environments. While recognising the associated challenges, this study highlighted the potential in reducing healthcare costs. Further studies should evaluate the impact and limitations of HOBs on patients’ recovery and outcomes, compared to HDU and NICU.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e073461.full
spellingShingle Vassili Crispi
William Bolton
Ian Anderson
Rebecca Town
Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
BMJ Open
title Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_full Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_fullStr Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_short Effect of neurosurgical high observation beds (HOBs) on service provision: a single-centre experience and cost analysis
title_sort effect of neurosurgical high observation beds hobs on service provision a single centre experience and cost analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e073461.full
work_keys_str_mv AT vassilicrispi effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis
AT williambolton effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis
AT iananderson effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis
AT rebeccatown effectofneurosurgicalhighobservationbedshobsonserviceprovisionasinglecentreexperienceandcostanalysis