Investigation on the Rationality of the Extant Ways of Scoring the Interpersonal Reactivity Index Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis
As the most frequently used tool for measuring empathy, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) is often scored by researchers arbitrarily and casually. Many commonly used IRI scoring approaches and their corresponding measurement models are unverified, which may make the conclusions of subsequent...
Main Authors: | Yang Wang, Yun Li, Wanting Xiao, Yuanshu Fu, Jing Jie |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01086/full |
Similar Items
-
Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index
by: Dennis Grevenstein
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Critical Synthesis Package: Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)
by: Sara Konrath
Published: (2013-10-01) -
Re-examining the relationship between interpersonal reactivity index sub-scales and mental well-being: Implications of the pandemic
by: Mohua Das Gupta, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Empathy and Schizotypy: A Network Comparison of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in High and Low Schizotypy Groups
by: Lillian A. Hammer, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Bayesian and Maximum-Likelihood Modeling and Higher-Level Scores of Interpersonal Problems With Circumplex Structure
by: Anneke C. Weide, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)