Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014

This study aims to understand how different reference periods (i.e., calibration periods) of climate data used to estimate drought indices influence regional drought assessments. Specifically, we investigate the influences of different reference periods on historical drought characteristics, suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.-J. Um, Y. Kim, D. Park, J. Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-10-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/4989/2017/hess-21-4989-2017.pdf
_version_ 1818056201802350592
author M.-J. Um
Y. Kim
D. Park
J. Kim
author_facet M.-J. Um
Y. Kim
D. Park
J. Kim
author_sort M.-J. Um
collection DOAJ
description This study aims to understand how different reference periods (i.e., calibration periods) of climate data used to estimate drought indices influence regional drought assessments. Specifically, we investigate the influences of different reference periods on historical drought characteristics, such as the trend, frequency, intensity and spatial extent, using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) with a 12-month lag (SPEI-12), which was estimated from the datasets of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) and the University of Delaware (UDEL). For the 1901–1957 (P1) and 1958–2014 (P2) estimation periods, three different types of reference periods are used to compute the SPEI: P1 and P2 together, P1 and P2 separately and P1 only. Focusing on East Asia, Europe, the United States and West Africa, we find that the influence of the reference period is significant in East Asia and West Africa, with dominant drying trends from P1 to P2. The reference period influenced the assessment of drought characteristics, particularly the severity and spatial extent, whereas the influence on the frequency was relatively small. Finally, self-calibration, which is the most common practice for indices such as the SPEI, tends to underestimate the drought severity and spatial extent relative to the other approaches used in this study. Although the conclusions drawn in this study are limited by the use of two global datasets, they highlight the need for clarification of the reference period in drought assessments to better understand regional drought characteristics and the associated temporal changes, particularly under climate change scenarios.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T12:25:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3414858bbfdb468eaeba24dc69e868db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T12:25:05Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3414858bbfdb468eaeba24dc69e868db2022-12-22T01:48:59ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382017-10-01214989500710.5194/hess-21-4989-2017Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014M.-J. Um0Y. Kim1D. Park2J. Kim3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Plant Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaThis study aims to understand how different reference periods (i.e., calibration periods) of climate data used to estimate drought indices influence regional drought assessments. Specifically, we investigate the influences of different reference periods on historical drought characteristics, such as the trend, frequency, intensity and spatial extent, using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) with a 12-month lag (SPEI-12), which was estimated from the datasets of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) and the University of Delaware (UDEL). For the 1901–1957 (P1) and 1958–2014 (P2) estimation periods, three different types of reference periods are used to compute the SPEI: P1 and P2 together, P1 and P2 separately and P1 only. Focusing on East Asia, Europe, the United States and West Africa, we find that the influence of the reference period is significant in East Asia and West Africa, with dominant drying trends from P1 to P2. The reference period influenced the assessment of drought characteristics, particularly the severity and spatial extent, whereas the influence on the frequency was relatively small. Finally, self-calibration, which is the most common practice for indices such as the SPEI, tends to underestimate the drought severity and spatial extent relative to the other approaches used in this study. Although the conclusions drawn in this study are limited by the use of two global datasets, they highlight the need for clarification of the reference period in drought assessments to better understand regional drought characteristics and the associated temporal changes, particularly under climate change scenarios.https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/4989/2017/hess-21-4989-2017.pdf
spellingShingle M.-J. Um
Y. Kim
D. Park
J. Kim
Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014
title_full Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014
title_fullStr Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014
title_short Effects of different reference periods on drought index (SPEI) estimations from 1901 to 2014
title_sort effects of different reference periods on drought index spei estimations from 1901 to 2014
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/4989/2017/hess-21-4989-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mjum effectsofdifferentreferenceperiodsondroughtindexspeiestimationsfrom1901to2014
AT ykim effectsofdifferentreferenceperiodsondroughtindexspeiestimationsfrom1901to2014
AT dpark effectsofdifferentreferenceperiodsondroughtindexspeiestimationsfrom1901to2014
AT jkim effectsofdifferentreferenceperiodsondroughtindexspeiestimationsfrom1901to2014